Degradation increases peat greenhouse gas emissions in undrained tropical peat swamp forests

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Erin Swails, Steve Frolking, Jia Deng, Kristell Hergoualc’h
{"title":"Degradation increases peat greenhouse gas emissions in undrained tropical peat swamp forests","authors":"Erin Swails,&nbsp;Steve Frolking,&nbsp;Jia Deng,&nbsp;Kristell Hergoualc’h","doi":"10.1007/s10533-023-01110-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tropical peat swamp degradation can modify net peat greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions even without drainage. However, current Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines do not provide default emission factors (EF) for anthropogenically-degraded undrained organic soils. We reviewed published field measurements of peat GHG fluxes in undrained undegraded and degraded peat swamp forests in Southeast Asia (SEA) and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Degradation without drainage shifted the peat from a net CO<sub>2</sub> sink to a source in both SEA (− 2.9 ± 1.8 to 4.1 ± 2.0 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>–C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and LAC (− 4.3 ± 1.8 to 1.4 ± 2.2 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>–C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). It raised peat CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) in SEA (22.1 ± 13.6 to 32.7 ± 7.8) but decreased them in LAC (218.3 ± 54.2 to 165.0 ± 4.5). Degradation increased peat N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) in SEA forests (0.9 ± 0.5 to 4.8 ± 2.3) (limited N<sub>2</sub>O data). It shifted peat from a net GHG sink to a source in SEA (− 7.9 ± 6.9 to 20.7 ± 7.4 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and increased peat GHG emissions in LAC (9.8 ± 9.0 to 24.3 ± 8.2 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). The large observed increase in net peat GHG emissions in undrained degraded forests compared to undegraded conditions calls for their inclusion as a new class in the IPCC guidelines. As current default IPCC EF for tropical organic soils are based only on data collected in SEA ombrotrophic peatlands, expanded geographic representation and refinement of peat GHG EF by nutrient status are also needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8901,"journal":{"name":"Biogeochemistry","volume":"167 1","pages":"59 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-023-01110-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-023-01110-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical peat swamp degradation can modify net peat greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions even without drainage. However, current Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines do not provide default emission factors (EF) for anthropogenically-degraded undrained organic soils. We reviewed published field measurements of peat GHG fluxes in undrained undegraded and degraded peat swamp forests in Southeast Asia (SEA) and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Degradation without drainage shifted the peat from a net CO2 sink to a source in both SEA (− 2.9 ± 1.8 to 4.1 ± 2.0 Mg CO2–C ha−1 yr−1) and LAC (− 4.3 ± 1.8 to 1.4 ± 2.2 Mg CO2–C ha−1 yr−1). It raised peat CH4 emissions (kg C ha−1 yr−1) in SEA (22.1 ± 13.6 to 32.7 ± 7.8) but decreased them in LAC (218.3 ± 54.2 to 165.0 ± 4.5). Degradation increased peat N2O emissions (kg N ha−1 yr−1) in SEA forests (0.9 ± 0.5 to 4.8 ± 2.3) (limited N2O data). It shifted peat from a net GHG sink to a source in SEA (− 7.9 ± 6.9 to 20.7 ± 7.4 Mg CO2-equivalent ha−1 yr−1) and increased peat GHG emissions in LAC (9.8 ± 9.0 to 24.3 ± 8.2 Mg CO2-equivalent ha−1 yr−1). The large observed increase in net peat GHG emissions in undrained degraded forests compared to undegraded conditions calls for their inclusion as a new class in the IPCC guidelines. As current default IPCC EF for tropical organic soils are based only on data collected in SEA ombrotrophic peatlands, expanded geographic representation and refinement of peat GHG EF by nutrient status are also needed.

Abstract Image

退化增加了未排水热带泥炭沼泽林的泥炭温室气体排放量
即使不排水,热带泥炭沼泽的退化也会改变泥炭的温室气体(GHG)净排放量。然而,目前的政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)指南并没有为人为退化的未排水有机土壤提供默认排放因子(EF)。我们回顾了已发表的东南亚(SEA)和拉丁美洲及加勒比海(LAC)未排水退化泥炭沼泽林中泥炭温室气体通量的实地测量结果。在东南亚(- 2.9 ± 1.8 到 4.1 ± 2.0 兆克 CO2-C(公顷-1 年-1))和拉丁美洲及加勒比(- 4.3 ± 1.8 到 1.4 ± 2.2 兆克 CO2-C(公顷-1 年-1)),未排水的退化使泥炭从净二氧化碳汇转变为二氧化碳源。在东南亚,泥炭 CH4 排放量(千克碳-公顷-1 年-1)增加了(22.1 ± 13.6 到 32.7 ± 7.8),而在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区则减少了(218.3 ± 54.2 到 165.0 ± 4.5)。退化增加了东南亚森林的泥炭 N2O 排放量(千克 N 公顷-1 年-1)(0.9 ± 0.5 至 4.8 ± 2.3)(N2O 数据有限)。它使东南亚地区的泥炭从温室气体净汇变为温室气体源(- 7.9 ± 6.9 到 20.7 ± 7.4 兆克 CO2 当量公顷-1 年-1),并增加了拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的泥炭温室气体排放量(9.8 ± 9.0 到 24.3 ± 8.2 兆克 CO2 当量公顷-1 年-1)。与未退化条件相比,在排水退化森林中观察到泥炭温室气体净排放量大幅增加,这要求将其作为一个新类别纳入 IPCC 指南。由于目前 IPCC 对热带有机土壤的默认 EF 仅基于在 SEA 闭养泥炭地收集的数据,因此还需要扩大地域代表性,并根据营养状况对泥炭温室气体 EF 进行细化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biogeochemistry
Biogeochemistry 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: Biogeochemistry publishes original and synthetic papers dealing with biotic controls on the chemistry of the environment, or with the geochemical control of the structure and function of ecosystems. Cycles are considered, either of individual elements or of specific classes of natural or anthropogenic compounds in ecosystems. Particular emphasis is given to coupled interactions of element cycles. The journal spans from the molecular to global scales to elucidate the mechanisms driving patterns in biogeochemical cycles through space and time. Studies on both natural and artificial ecosystems are published when they contribute to a general understanding of biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信