Prescription practices of physicians, quality of care, and patients' safety: A mixed methods comprehensive study.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Muhammad Ahmed Abdullah, Ameer Sikander Ahmed, Babar Tasneem Shaikh, Mohammad Bilal Kaleem, Abdullah Sumbal, Zahid Naeem
{"title":"Prescription practices of physicians, quality of care, and patients' safety: A mixed methods comprehensive study.","authors":"Muhammad Ahmed Abdullah, Ameer Sikander Ahmed, Babar Tasneem Shaikh, Mohammad Bilal Kaleem, Abdullah Sumbal, Zahid Naeem","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Amidst inconsistent prescribing patterns and potentially harmful medication errors in the field of medical practice, this study endeavored to explore the prescription practices of physicians in Rawalpindi metropolitan city in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed method study was conducted based on the analysis of 1232 prescriptions gathered from 16 pharmacies, along with in-depth interviews with 13 practicing physicians. The prescriptions were assessed for legibility, polypharmacy, patient details, history, diagnosis, and other relevant information. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and the prevalence of various aspects of prescription accuracy was calculated. Thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half of the prescriptions were from the private general practitioners, and the rest were from hospital-based doctors and consultants. Only a small percentage of prescriptions were fully legible, and many had incomplete or missing patient information, medical history, and diagnosis. Polypharmacy was also found to be prevalent, with significant differences in prescription accuracy across different medical specialties. The absence of continuing medical education, influence of pharmaceutical industry, and overcrowded practice settings drive the doctors to prescription practices. On the user side, perception of polypharmacy, patient-physician communication, and availability and cost of medicines emerged as major themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an obvious need to improve prescription accuracy regarding patient safety on the whole. Increased investment in health-care infrastructure, greater access to continuing medical education, and a commitment to promote evidence-based medicine could make a difference. Prescription practices must be safe, effective, and aligned with the latest advances in medical science.</p>","PeriodicalId":47093,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS","volume":"18 1","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10768469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Amidst inconsistent prescribing patterns and potentially harmful medication errors in the field of medical practice, this study endeavored to explore the prescription practices of physicians in Rawalpindi metropolitan city in Pakistan.

Methods: A mixed method study was conducted based on the analysis of 1232 prescriptions gathered from 16 pharmacies, along with in-depth interviews with 13 practicing physicians. The prescriptions were assessed for legibility, polypharmacy, patient details, history, diagnosis, and other relevant information. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and the prevalence of various aspects of prescription accuracy was calculated. Thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data.

Results: Almost half of the prescriptions were from the private general practitioners, and the rest were from hospital-based doctors and consultants. Only a small percentage of prescriptions were fully legible, and many had incomplete or missing patient information, medical history, and diagnosis. Polypharmacy was also found to be prevalent, with significant differences in prescription accuracy across different medical specialties. The absence of continuing medical education, influence of pharmaceutical industry, and overcrowded practice settings drive the doctors to prescription practices. On the user side, perception of polypharmacy, patient-physician communication, and availability and cost of medicines emerged as major themes.

Conclusion: There is an obvious need to improve prescription accuracy regarding patient safety on the whole. Increased investment in health-care infrastructure, greater access to continuing medical education, and a commitment to promote evidence-based medicine could make a difference. Prescription practices must be safe, effective, and aligned with the latest advances in medical science.

医生的处方做法、护理质量和患者安全:混合方法综合研究。
研究目的在医疗实践中存在不一致的处方模式和潜在的有害用药错误的情况下,本研究致力于探索巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第大都市医生的处方实践:本研究采用混合方法,分析了从 16 家药房收集的 1232 份处方,并对 13 名执业医师进行了深入访谈。对处方的可读性、多药性、患者详情、病史、诊断和其他相关信息进行了评估。使用描述性统计对数据进行了分析,并计算了处方准确性各方面的普遍性。对定性数据进行了主题分析:近一半的处方来自私人全科医生,其余来自医院的医生和顾问。只有一小部分处方是完全可读的,许多处方的病人信息、病史和诊断不完整或缺失。多药滥用现象也很普遍,不同专科医师开具处方的准确性也存在显著差异。缺乏继续医学教育、制药业的影响以及过度拥挤的执业环境促使医生开处方。在用户方面,多药合用、医患沟通、药品供应和成本是主要问题:从整体上看,显然有必要提高处方的准确性,以保障患者安全。增加对医疗保健基础设施的投资、增加接受继续医学教育的机会,以及致力于推广循证医学,这些都会带来改变。处方实践必须安全、有效,并与医学科学的最新进展保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS
International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信