The Need to Consider Context: A Systematic Review of Factors Involved in the Consent Process for Genetic Tests from the Perspective of Patients.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2023.2297935
Frédéric Coulombe, Anne-Marie Laberge
{"title":"The Need to Consider Context: A Systematic Review of Factors Involved in the Consent Process for Genetic Tests from the Perspective of Patients.","authors":"Frédéric Coulombe, Anne-Marie Laberge","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2023.2297935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Informed consent for genetic tests is a well-established practice. It should be based on good quality information and in keeping with the patient's values. Existing informed consent assessment tools assess knowledge and values. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on what specific elements need to be discussed or considered in the consent process for genetic tests.<b>Methods:</b> We performed a systematic review to identify all factors involved in the decision-making and consent process about genetic testing, from the perspective of patients. Through public databases, we identified studies reporting factors that influence the decision to accept or decline genetic testing. Studies were included if they reported the perspective of patients or at-risk individuals. All articles were thematically coded.<b>Results:</b> 1989 articles were reviewed: 70 met inclusion criteria and 12 additional articles were identified through the references of included studies. Coding of the 82 articles led to the identification of 45 factors involved in decision-making and consent, which were initially divided into three domains: in favor of, against or with an undetermined influence on genetic testing. Each factor was also divided into three subdomains relating to the informed choice concept: knowledge, values or other. The factors in the \"other\" subdomain were all related to the context of testing (e.g. timing, cost, influence of family members, etc), and were present in all three domains.<b>Conclusions:</b> We describe the network of factors contributing to decision-making and consent process and identify the context of genetic testing as a third component to influence this process. Future studies should consider the evaluation of contextual factors as an important and relevant component of the consent and decision-making process about genetic tests. Based on these results, we plan to develop and test a more comprehensive tool to assess informed consent for genetic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"93-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2023.2297935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informed consent for genetic tests is a well-established practice. It should be based on good quality information and in keeping with the patient's values. Existing informed consent assessment tools assess knowledge and values. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on what specific elements need to be discussed or considered in the consent process for genetic tests.Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify all factors involved in the decision-making and consent process about genetic testing, from the perspective of patients. Through public databases, we identified studies reporting factors that influence the decision to accept or decline genetic testing. Studies were included if they reported the perspective of patients or at-risk individuals. All articles were thematically coded.Results: 1989 articles were reviewed: 70 met inclusion criteria and 12 additional articles were identified through the references of included studies. Coding of the 82 articles led to the identification of 45 factors involved in decision-making and consent, which were initially divided into three domains: in favor of, against or with an undetermined influence on genetic testing. Each factor was also divided into three subdomains relating to the informed choice concept: knowledge, values or other. The factors in the "other" subdomain were all related to the context of testing (e.g. timing, cost, influence of family members, etc), and were present in all three domains.Conclusions: We describe the network of factors contributing to decision-making and consent process and identify the context of genetic testing as a third component to influence this process. Future studies should consider the evaluation of contextual factors as an important and relevant component of the consent and decision-making process about genetic tests. Based on these results, we plan to develop and test a more comprehensive tool to assess informed consent for genetic testing.

考虑背景的必要性:从患者角度系统回顾基因检测同意过程中的相关因素》。
背景:基因检测的知情同意是一种行之有效的做法。知情同意应基于高质量的信息并符合患者的价值观。现有的知情同意评估工具可对知识和价值观进行评估。然而,对于在基因检测同意过程中需要讨论或考虑哪些具体因素,目前还没有达成共识:我们从患者的角度出发,对基因检测的决策和同意过程中涉及的所有因素进行了系统回顾。通过公共数据库,我们确定了报告影响接受或拒绝基因检测决定的因素的研究。如果研究报告从患者或高危人群的角度出发,则会被纳入其中。我们对所有文章进行了主题编码:共审查了 1989 篇文章:结果:共审查了 1989 篇文章:其中 70 篇符合纳入标准,另外 12 篇是通过纳入研究的参考文献确定的。对这 82 篇文章进行编码后,确定了涉及决策和同意的 45 个因素,这些因素初步分为三个领域:赞成、反对或对基因检测的影响未定。每个因素又分为三个与知情选择概念相关的子域:知识、价值观或其他。其他 "子域中的因素都与检测的背景有关(如时间、成本、家庭成员的影响等),并且在所有三个域中都存在:我们描述了促成决策和同意过程的因素网络,并确定基因检测的背景是影响这一过程的第三个因素。未来的研究应考虑将背景因素作为基因检测同意和决策过程的一个重要相关组成部分进行评估。基于这些结果,我们计划开发和测试一个更全面的工具,以评估基因检测的知情同意情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信