Relationship between implementation of systematic advance care planning and the quality of death among nursing home residents: a survey.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524231219519
Yoshie Toyoda, Aya Tokumasu, Yuki Minato, Takayasu Sone, Kyoko Oshiro, Hideki Kojima, Mitsunori Nishikawa
{"title":"Relationship between implementation of systematic advance care planning and the quality of death among nursing home residents: a survey.","authors":"Yoshie Toyoda, Aya Tokumasu, Yuki Minato, Takayasu Sone, Kyoko Oshiro, Hideki Kojima, Mitsunori Nishikawa","doi":"10.1177/26323524231219519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) is beneficial for the quality of death (QOD). However, the effects of ACP on the QOD may vary across cultures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the relationship between the 15-step ACP program and the QOD among Japanese nursing home residents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among the family members of 39 nursing home residents who died between April 2017 and March 2019 by distributing the survey questionnaire by post. The survey included questions about the QOD of residents, and responses were evaluated using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 30 of the 39 bereaved families (76.9%). Data were analyzed using hierarchical clustering to determine five groups and conduct multiple comparisons. The following three domains of interest were identified: 'Dying in a favorite place', 'Good relationship with the medical staff', and 'Independence'. GDI scores were significantly higher for residents with higher ACP completion rates than for those with lower rates (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Residents who had taken ACP interviews had significantly higher GDI scores (<i>p</i> < 0.01) than those who had not taken interviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these findings suggest that systematic ACP might be related to the QOD among Japanese nursing home residents in the above mentioned three domains. Limitations of the present study were small sample size, cross-sectional survey design as opposed to a cohort survey design, and multiple biases, including the emotional instability of bereaved family members, the length of stay of the residents, the degree of dementia of the residents, and their tendency to talk about the place of death and to develop good relationships with the medical staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10771744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231219519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is beneficial for the quality of death (QOD). However, the effects of ACP on the QOD may vary across cultures.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the relationship between the 15-step ACP program and the QOD among Japanese nursing home residents.

Design: A cross-sectional survey.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among the family members of 39 nursing home residents who died between April 2017 and March 2019 by distributing the survey questionnaire by post. The survey included questions about the QOD of residents, and responses were evaluated using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) scale.

Results: Responses were obtained from 30 of the 39 bereaved families (76.9%). Data were analyzed using hierarchical clustering to determine five groups and conduct multiple comparisons. The following three domains of interest were identified: 'Dying in a favorite place', 'Good relationship with the medical staff', and 'Independence'. GDI scores were significantly higher for residents with higher ACP completion rates than for those with lower rates (p < 0.01). Residents who had taken ACP interviews had significantly higher GDI scores (p < 0.01) than those who had not taken interviews.

Conclusion: Overall, these findings suggest that systematic ACP might be related to the QOD among Japanese nursing home residents in the above mentioned three domains. Limitations of the present study were small sample size, cross-sectional survey design as opposed to a cohort survey design, and multiple biases, including the emotional instability of bereaved family members, the length of stay of the residents, the degree of dementia of the residents, and their tendency to talk about the place of death and to develop good relationships with the medical staff.

系统性预先护理计划的实施与养老院居民死亡质量之间的关系:一项调查。
背景:预先护理计划(ACP)有利于提高死亡质量(QOD)。然而,ACP 对 QOD 的影响可能因文化而异:本研究旨在探讨 15 步 ACP 计划与日本养老院居民死亡质量之间的关系:设计:横断面调查:通过邮寄调查问卷的方式,对 2017 年 4 月至 2019 年 3 月期间死亡的 39 名养老院居民的家属进行了横断面调查。调查内容包括有关院友 QOD 的问题,并使用 "美好死亡量表"(Good Death Inventory,GDI)对回答情况进行评估:39 个丧亲家庭中有 30 个(76.9%)提供了答复。数据采用分层聚类法进行分析,以确定五个组别并进行多重比较。确定了以下三个相关领域:在喜欢的地方去世"、"与医护人员关系融洽 "和 "独立"。ACP 完成率较高的住院医师的 GDI 得分明显高于完成率较低的住院医师(p p 结论:总体而言,这些研究结果表明,在上述三个方面,系统性 ACP 可能与日本养老院居民的 QOD 有关。本研究的局限性在于样本量较小、横断面调查设计(而非队列调查设计)以及多种偏差,包括丧亲家属的情绪不稳定性、住户的入住时间、住户的痴呆程度以及住户谈论死亡地点和与医护人员建立良好关系的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信