Opioid use disorder and motivational interviewing: Training physician assistants for the epidemic.

Q3 Medicine
Brian B Peacock, Catherine N Shull, Carol A Hildebrandt, Gayle B Bodner, Kristin J Lindaman, Chris Gillette
{"title":"Opioid use disorder and motivational interviewing: Training physician assistants for the epidemic.","authors":"Brian B Peacock, Catherine N Shull, Carol A Hildebrandt, Gayle B Bodner, Kristin J Lindaman, Chris Gillette","doi":"10.5055/jom.0835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To evaluate the effectiveness of a curriculum on physician assistant (PA) students' knowledge about opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and management and (2) present student satisfaction with the curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three cohorts of PA students completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires about their knowledge of motivational interviewing (MI) for OUD. One cohort of students completed the 11-item questionnaire without exposure to the intervention (control group). Students' satisfaction with the curriculum was assessed as was their pre- and post-intervention knowledge about using MI for OUD. Bivariate statistical tests were used to analyze the quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred complete and usable responses were obtained from the four cohorts of PA students (n = 300, 87.7 percent response rate). The intervention groups answered a higher number of items correctly (median = 7) than the control group (median = 6, Wilcoxon sign test M = 31, p < 0.0001). Among the intervention group, there was not a statistically significant between cohort difference on: (1) the number of identical pre- and post-intervention questionnaire items answered correctly (Chi-square = 3.77, DF = 2, p = 0.15), and (2) the total number of items answered correctly on the post-intervention questionnaire (Chi-square = 0.32, DF = 2, p = 0.85). Student comments suggest students were supportive of the curriculum, with improvements noted on how to deliver the material.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An educational intervention using MI for PA students was found to be valuable, and students who completed the intervention had greater knowledge about using MI with OUD patients than those who did not complete the training. The size of the effect was small, and more research on the curriculum is necessary prior to widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"19 6","pages":"507-513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To evaluate the effectiveness of a curriculum on physician assistant (PA) students' knowledge about opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and management and (2) present student satisfaction with the curriculum.

Methods: Three cohorts of PA students completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires about their knowledge of motivational interviewing (MI) for OUD. One cohort of students completed the 11-item questionnaire without exposure to the intervention (control group). Students' satisfaction with the curriculum was assessed as was their pre- and post-intervention knowledge about using MI for OUD. Bivariate statistical tests were used to analyze the quantitative data.

Results: Three hundred complete and usable responses were obtained from the four cohorts of PA students (n = 300, 87.7 percent response rate). The intervention groups answered a higher number of items correctly (median = 7) than the control group (median = 6, Wilcoxon sign test M = 31, p < 0.0001). Among the intervention group, there was not a statistically significant between cohort difference on: (1) the number of identical pre- and post-intervention questionnaire items answered correctly (Chi-square = 3.77, DF = 2, p = 0.15), and (2) the total number of items answered correctly on the post-intervention questionnaire (Chi-square = 0.32, DF = 2, p = 0.85). Student comments suggest students were supportive of the curriculum, with improvements noted on how to deliver the material.

Conclusions: An educational intervention using MI for PA students was found to be valuable, and students who completed the intervention had greater knowledge about using MI with OUD patients than those who did not complete the training. The size of the effect was small, and more research on the curriculum is necessary prior to widespread adoption.

阿片类药物使用障碍与动机访谈:培训医生助理应对流行病。
目的:(1)评估一门课程对助理医师(PA)学生了解阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗和管理知识的效果;(2)介绍学生对该课程的满意度:三批助理医师学生分别在干预前和干预后完成了关于他们对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗动机访谈(MI)知识的问卷调查。一组学生在没有接触干预的情况下完成了 11 个项目的问卷调查(对照组)。评估了学生对课程的满意度,以及他们在干预前后对使用 MI 治疗 OUD 的了解程度。采用二元统计检验法对定量数据进行分析:从四批 PA 学生中获得了 300 份完整可用的回复(n = 300,回复率为 87.7%)。与对照组(中位数 = 6,Wilcoxon 符号检验 M = 31,P < 0.0001)相比,干预组回答正确的项目数(中位数 = 7)更多。在干预组中,组间差异在统计学上并不显著:(1) 干预前和干预后正确回答相同问卷项目的数量(Chi-square = 3.77,DF = 2,p = 0.15),以及 (2) 干预后正确回答问卷项目的总数(Chi-square = 0.32,DF = 2,p = 0.85)。学生的评论表明,学生们支持该课程,并在如何提供材料方面有所改进:针对PA专业学生的多元智能教育干预是有价值的,完成干预的学生比未完成培训的学生更了解如何对OUD患者使用多元智能。效果很小,在广泛采用之前有必要对课程进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信