Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pada Aspek Hubungan Industrial

Ahmad Fadli Fauzi
{"title":"Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pada Aspek Hubungan Industrial","authors":"Ahmad Fadli Fauzi","doi":"10.20885/jlr.vol8.iss1.art2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policy direction in the Job Creation Law appears to exhibit a political nuance and thus inseparable from the negotiation of interests between the authorities and entrepreneurs. As a result, the legal products produced only satisfy the political principles and hence are problematic. The issues with the Job Creation Law are not only at the legislative stage; but at the level of normative substance whereby there are several problematic articles. For instance, in terms of wages, the phrase \"necessities for a decent living\" as regulated in Article 88 has been removed, alterations to Article 151 which have the potential for unilateral layoffs, and the repeal of Article 59 regarding PKWT which was previously regulated in the Employment Law. The formulation of the problem in this article is what are the legal politics in the Job Creation Law, especially in the industrial relations aspect and the implications of the norms of the Law? The research method used is juridical-normative research using a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. Meanwhile, the data used is secondary data which includes primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The findings in this article show that the legal politics of the Job Creation Law in the industrial relations aspect only fulfill political rules, but fail to fulfill the rights and interests of workers. Apart from that, several problematic articles were found in the Employment Chapter of the Job Creation Law, for example regarding wages, layoffs, PKWT, and so on. In this regards, the Job Creation Law is unable to address problems in the industrial relations aspect, because at the substantive level, problematic norms have the potential to injure the workers/employees who are in a weaker position.","PeriodicalId":141165,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Lex Renaissance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Lex Renaissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol8.iss1.art2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The policy direction in the Job Creation Law appears to exhibit a political nuance and thus inseparable from the negotiation of interests between the authorities and entrepreneurs. As a result, the legal products produced only satisfy the political principles and hence are problematic. The issues with the Job Creation Law are not only at the legislative stage; but at the level of normative substance whereby there are several problematic articles. For instance, in terms of wages, the phrase "necessities for a decent living" as regulated in Article 88 has been removed, alterations to Article 151 which have the potential for unilateral layoffs, and the repeal of Article 59 regarding PKWT which was previously regulated in the Employment Law. The formulation of the problem in this article is what are the legal politics in the Job Creation Law, especially in the industrial relations aspect and the implications of the norms of the Law? The research method used is juridical-normative research using a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. Meanwhile, the data used is secondary data which includes primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The findings in this article show that the legal politics of the Job Creation Law in the industrial relations aspect only fulfill political rules, but fail to fulfill the rights and interests of workers. Apart from that, several problematic articles were found in the Employment Chapter of the Job Creation Law, for example regarding wages, layoffs, PKWT, and so on. In this regards, the Job Creation Law is unable to address problems in the industrial relations aspect, because at the substantive level, problematic norms have the potential to injure the workers/employees who are in a weaker position.
关于劳资关系方面的《创造就业法》的法律政治问题
创造就业法》的政策方向似乎表现出政治上的细微差别,因此与当局和企业家之间的利益谈判密不可分。因此,所产生的法律产品只能满足政治原则,因而是有问题的。创造就业机会法》的问题不仅存在于立法阶段,而且还存在于规范性实质内容层面,其中有若干条款存在问题。例如,在工资方面,第 88 条规定的 "体面生活必需品 "被删除,第 151 条的修改有可能导致单方面裁员,第 59 条关于 PKWT 的规定被废除,而该规定之前在《就业法》中有所规定。本文提出的问题是:《创造就业法》中的法律政治,特别是劳资关系方面的法律政治以及该法规范的影响是什么?本文采用的研究方法是法学-规范研究,使用概念方法和法定方法。同时,使用的数据是二手数据,包括第一手、第二手和第三手法律资料。本文的研究结果表明,《就业创造法》在劳资关系方面的法律政治只是履行了政治规则,但未能实现工人的权益。除此之外,在《就业创业法》的 "就业篇 "中还发现了一些问题条款,如工资、裁员、PKWT 等。在这方面,《创造就业法》无法解决劳资关系方面的问题,因为在实质层面,有问题的规范有可能伤害处于弱势地位的工人/雇员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信