The Ruin of “Best-Laid Plans”: Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men and Yates’s Revolutionary Road

IF 0.9 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Kimberly Parrott
{"title":"The Ruin of “Best-Laid Plans”: Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men and Yates’s Revolutionary Road","authors":"Kimberly Parrott","doi":"10.5325/steinbeckreview.20.1.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the centuries since the United States became a nation, much has been written about the American Dream, which is often defined by a longing for home, independence, and security. Some works of John Steinbeck, however, encapsulate the antithesis of this national Dream in portraying the denial or collapse of hoped-for success and happiness. His Of Mice and Men (1937), to illustrate, speaks to failed American aspirations that range from the longing for home, independence, and equal rights, to the need for humane treatment of all. Twenty-four years later, Richard Yates also wrote an acclaimed work depicting the anti–American Dream, his novel Revolutionary Road (1961). These two novels share commonalities that may be analyzed in terms of characterization, themes, and their representation of the sources of the Dream’s oppressors. In Steinbeck’s last work, the nonfiction America and Americans (1966), he describes an America that eerily matches the United States that Yates portrays in his fictional Revolutionary Road. In essence, these two significant novels, Of Mice and Men and Revolutionary Road, written twenty-four years apart and each representative of its times, serve as parallels for capturing the antithesis of the American Dream—an antithesis still prevalent in literature and life.","PeriodicalId":40417,"journal":{"name":"Steinbeck Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"101 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Steinbeck Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/steinbeckreview.20.1.0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In the centuries since the United States became a nation, much has been written about the American Dream, which is often defined by a longing for home, independence, and security. Some works of John Steinbeck, however, encapsulate the antithesis of this national Dream in portraying the denial or collapse of hoped-for success and happiness. His Of Mice and Men (1937), to illustrate, speaks to failed American aspirations that range from the longing for home, independence, and equal rights, to the need for humane treatment of all. Twenty-four years later, Richard Yates also wrote an acclaimed work depicting the anti–American Dream, his novel Revolutionary Road (1961). These two novels share commonalities that may be analyzed in terms of characterization, themes, and their representation of the sources of the Dream’s oppressors. In Steinbeck’s last work, the nonfiction America and Americans (1966), he describes an America that eerily matches the United States that Yates portrays in his fictional Revolutionary Road. In essence, these two significant novels, Of Mice and Men and Revolutionary Road, written twenty-four years apart and each representative of its times, serve as parallels for capturing the antithesis of the American Dream—an antithesis still prevalent in literature and life.
最佳计划 "的毁灭:斯坦贝克的《人鼠之间》和耶茨的《革命之路
摘要:自美国建国以来的几个世纪中,关于 "美国梦 "的论述可谓汗牛充栋。"美国梦 "通常被定义为对家园、独立和安全的渴望。然而,约翰-斯坦贝克的一些作品却体现了这一民族梦想的对立面,描绘了人们所期望的成功和幸福的被剥夺或崩溃。他的《人鼠之间》(Of Mice and Men,1937 年)就是一个很好的例子,它讲述了美国人失败的愿望,从对家、独立和平等权利的渴望,到对所有人的人道待遇的需求。24 年后,理查德-耶茨也写出了一部描写反美国梦的广受赞誉的作品,即他的小说《革命之路》(1961 年)。这两部小说在人物塑造、主题以及对梦想的压迫者的来源的表现等方面都有共同之处,可供分析。在斯坦贝克的最后一部作品,非虚构作品《美国和美国人》(1966 年)中,他描述的美国与耶茨在虚构作品《革命之路》中描绘的美国极为相似。从本质上讲,《人鼠之间》和《革命之路》这两部相隔二十四年、各具时代代表性的重要小说,是捕捉 "美国梦 "对立面的平行线--这种对立面在文学和生活中依然普遍存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Steinbeck Review
Steinbeck Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Steinbeck Review is an authorized publication on the life and works of American novelist John Steinbeck (1902–1968). It publishes scholarly articles; notes; book and performance reviews; creative writing; original artwork; and short intercalary pieces offering fresh perspectives, including notes on contemporary references to Steinbeck, discussions of the contexts of his work, and an occasional poem. Steinbeck Review has a threefold mission of broadening the scope of Steinbeck criticism, promoting the work of new and established scholars, and serving as a resource for Steinbeck teachers at all levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信