Éric Zemmour : Essayiste Pamphlétaire, Pamphlétaire Essayiste

P. Azou
{"title":"Éric Zemmour : Essayiste Pamphlétaire, Pamphlétaire Essayiste","authors":"P. Azou","doi":"10.3167/fpcs.2023.410205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If Renza Bensmaïa is right to see in the essay “the Other that gives birth to all the others” ; if it is indeed the case that, since Montaigne, it has fed on doubt and fuelled debate ; if it is therefore coeval with modernity ; then there is a contradiction between Éric Zemmour's essayistic stance and his — reactionary, extremist, xenophobic — political program. Instead of trying to resolve this contradiction by negating either of its terms, I follow the internal logic of the essay as practised by Zemmour to arrive at the paradox of an essayist who is also an extremist. Evolving from the essay to the pamphlet, and oscillating between the two, Zemmour is this paradoxical essayist who “tries” to escape the essay by means of the essay.","PeriodicalId":418722,"journal":{"name":"French Politics, Culture & Society","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Politics, Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/fpcs.2023.410205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If Renza Bensmaïa is right to see in the essay “the Other that gives birth to all the others” ; if it is indeed the case that, since Montaigne, it has fed on doubt and fuelled debate ; if it is therefore coeval with modernity ; then there is a contradiction between Éric Zemmour's essayistic stance and his — reactionary, extremist, xenophobic — political program. Instead of trying to resolve this contradiction by negating either of its terms, I follow the internal logic of the essay as practised by Zemmour to arrive at the paradox of an essayist who is also an extremist. Evolving from the essay to the pamphlet, and oscillating between the two, Zemmour is this paradoxical essayist who “tries” to escape the essay by means of the essay.
埃里克-泽穆尔:散文家、小册子作者、小册子作者、散文家
如果 Renza Bensmaïa 认为散文是 "孕育所有其他事物的他者";如果自蒙田以来,散文就一直是怀疑和辩论的源泉;如果散文与现代性共生;那么,Éric Zemmour 的散文立场与其反动、极端、仇外的政治纲领之间就存在着矛盾。我没有试图通过否定其中的任何一个术语来解决这一矛盾,而是按照泽穆尔所实践的散文的内在逻辑,得出了散文家同时也是极端主义者这一悖论。泽穆尔从散文发展到小册子,并在二者之间摇摆不定,他是一个矛盾的散文家,他 "试图 "通过散文来摆脱散文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信