Evaluating Emotion Arcs Across Languages: Bridging the Global Divide in Sentiment Analysis

D. Teodorescu, Saif M. Mohammad
{"title":"Evaluating Emotion Arcs Across Languages: Bridging the Global Divide in Sentiment Analysis","authors":"D. Teodorescu, Saif M. Mohammad","doi":"10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emotion arcs capture how an individual (or a population) feels over time. They are widely used in industry and research; however, there is little work on evaluating the automatically generated arcs. This is because of the difficulty of establishing the true (gold) emotion arc. Our work, for the first time, systematically and quantitatively evaluates automatically generated emotion arcs. We also compare two common ways of generating emotion arcs: Machine-Learning (ML) models and Lexicon-Only (LexO) methods. By running experiments on 18 diverse datasets in 9 languages, we show that despite being markedly poor at instance level emotion classification, LexO methods are highly accurate at generating emotion arcs when aggregating information from hundreds of instances. We also show, through experiments on six indigenous African languages, as well as Arabic, and Spanish, that automatic translations of English emotion lexicons can be used to generate high-quality emotion arcs in less-resource languages. This opens up avenues for work on emotions in languages from around the world; which is crucial for commerce, public policy, and health research in service of speakers often left behind. Code and resources: https://github.com/dteodore/EmotionArcs","PeriodicalId":505350,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing","volume":"8 1","pages":"4124-4137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion arcs capture how an individual (or a population) feels over time. They are widely used in industry and research; however, there is little work on evaluating the automatically generated arcs. This is because of the difficulty of establishing the true (gold) emotion arc. Our work, for the first time, systematically and quantitatively evaluates automatically generated emotion arcs. We also compare two common ways of generating emotion arcs: Machine-Learning (ML) models and Lexicon-Only (LexO) methods. By running experiments on 18 diverse datasets in 9 languages, we show that despite being markedly poor at instance level emotion classification, LexO methods are highly accurate at generating emotion arcs when aggregating information from hundreds of instances. We also show, through experiments on six indigenous African languages, as well as Arabic, and Spanish, that automatic translations of English emotion lexicons can be used to generate high-quality emotion arcs in less-resource languages. This opens up avenues for work on emotions in languages from around the world; which is crucial for commerce, public policy, and health research in service of speakers often left behind. Code and resources: https://github.com/dteodore/EmotionArcs
评估跨语言的情感弧线:弥合情感分析中的全球鸿沟
情绪弧捕捉个体(或群体)在一段时间内的感受。情感弧线被广泛应用于工业和研究领域;然而,对自动生成的情感弧线进行评估的工作却很少。这是因为难以确定真正的(黄金)情感弧线。我们的研究首次对自动生成的情感弧线进行了系统的定量评估。我们还比较了两种常见的情感弧线生成方法:机器学习(ML)模型和纯词典(LexO)方法。通过在 9 种语言的 18 个不同数据集上进行实验,我们发现,尽管 LexO 方法在实例级情感分类方面明显较差,但在汇总来自数百个实例的信息时,却能非常准确地生成情感弧线。我们还通过对六种非洲本土语言、阿拉伯语和西班牙语的实验表明,英语情感词典的自动翻译可用于在资源较少的语言中生成高质量的情感弧。这为世界各地语言的情感研究工作开辟了道路;这对商业、公共政策和健康研究至关重要,因为这些研究服务的对象往往是被遗忘的语言使用者。代码和资源:https://github.com/dteodore/EmotionArcs
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信