An Assessment of the Climate Damage Costs of European Short-Lived Climate Forcers

IF 2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Stefan Åström, Lovisa Källmark
{"title":"An Assessment of the Climate Damage Costs of European Short-Lived Climate Forcers","authors":"Stefan Åström, Lovisa Källmark","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In addition to effects from greenhouse gases, climate change is affected by short-lived climate forcers (SLCF). These are often co-emitted with carbon dioxide, and some are regulated air pollutants. In the governance of these pollutants, established estimates of damage costs of pollution inform benefit–cost analyses. However, climate change impact of SLCFs is omitted from these estimates. The purpose of this study is to calculate economic damage costs of air pollutants’ effect on climate change and compare these with established damage costs. Focus is on European emissions governed in the EU National Emission Reduction Commitments Directive during 2020–2050. We use well-known SLCF emission metrics and multiply with literature values on social costs of methane to calculate climate damage costs of SLCFs. The results indicate that average absolute climate damage costs are highest for black carbon ($59,500/ton in 2050) and lowest for nonmethane volatile organic compounds ($661/ton). Our indicative values are likely underestimations. Indicative climate damage costs are usually lower than established damage costs, with notable exceptions. We propose that more detailed studies are necessary, and that inclusion of climate damage costs into economic valuation of SLCFs is important for future air pollution and climate benefit–cost analyses.","PeriodicalId":45587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","volume":"40 1","pages":"230 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2023.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In addition to effects from greenhouse gases, climate change is affected by short-lived climate forcers (SLCF). These are often co-emitted with carbon dioxide, and some are regulated air pollutants. In the governance of these pollutants, established estimates of damage costs of pollution inform benefit–cost analyses. However, climate change impact of SLCFs is omitted from these estimates. The purpose of this study is to calculate economic damage costs of air pollutants’ effect on climate change and compare these with established damage costs. Focus is on European emissions governed in the EU National Emission Reduction Commitments Directive during 2020–2050. We use well-known SLCF emission metrics and multiply with literature values on social costs of methane to calculate climate damage costs of SLCFs. The results indicate that average absolute climate damage costs are highest for black carbon ($59,500/ton in 2050) and lowest for nonmethane volatile organic compounds ($661/ton). Our indicative values are likely underestimations. Indicative climate damage costs are usually lower than established damage costs, with notable exceptions. We propose that more detailed studies are necessary, and that inclusion of climate damage costs into economic valuation of SLCFs is important for future air pollution and climate benefit–cost analyses.
欧洲短期气候致变因素气候损害成本评估
摘要 除了温室气体的影响之外,气候变化还受到短期气候作用力(SLCF)的影响。它们通常与二氧化碳共同排放,其中一些是受管制的空气污染物。在治理这些污染物时,对污染损害成本的既定估算为效益成本分析提供了依据。然而,这些估算却忽略了 SLCF 对气候变化的影响。本研究的目的是计算空气污染物对气候变化影响的经济损失成本,并将其与既定的损失成本进行比较。研究重点是《欧盟国家减排承诺指令》中规定的 2020-2050 年期间的欧洲排放量。我们使用众所周知的 SLCF 排放指标,并乘以甲烷社会成本的文献值,计算 SLCF 的气候损害成本。结果表明,黑碳的平均绝对气候损害成本最高(2050 年为 59500 美元/吨),非甲烷挥发性有机化合物最低(661 美元/吨)。我们的指示性数值很可能被低估了。指示性气候损害成本通常低于确定的损害成本,但也有明显的例外。我们建议有必要进行更详细的研究,并将气候损害成本纳入 SLCFs 的经济估值中,这对未来的空气污染和气候效益成本分析非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信