Economic analysis of material and technical support of scientific potential of researchers at Kazakhstani universities

Anuar Aryngazin, Ansar Aryngazin, Askar Aryngazin, Madina Tynybayeva
{"title":"Economic analysis of material and technical support of scientific potential of researchers at Kazakhstani universities","authors":"Anuar Aryngazin, Ansar Aryngazin, Askar Aryngazin, Madina Tynybayeva","doi":"10.21003/ea.v203-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the pressing challenges confronting higher education institutions in Kazakhstan is the enhancement of the quality of academic and research training for students, particularly at the postgraduate level (PhD). This quality is significantly influenced by the research capabilities of academic faculties. The assessment of academic training involves various factors, including the proficiency level in scientific methodologies exhibited by academic staff and postgraduate students. Economics of material-technical infrastructure plays a pivotal, often decisive role in this training, especially in the realm of natural and technical sciences. The primary goal of our study is to gauge the proficiency levels in scientific methodologies among academic faculty, scrutinize economics of material-technical provisioning of higher education institutions, and to formulate pedagogical and administrative recommendations targeted at the academic staff and management of these institutions. In the presented country case study (Kazakhstan), a comprehensive survey and data collection were carried out, involving 23 higher education institutions, 22 research institutes (spanning the years 2019-2021), and about 800 surveyed academic and research representatives in the fields of humanities, natural-technical sciences, and mathematical disciplines. A pronounced deficiency (82%) was identified in the grasp of scientific methodologies within higher education institutions. Marginal variances were observed between universities and research institutes, as well as between natural-technical and social-humanitarian faculties. Alarmingly lower levels of material-technical provisioning per academic faculty member were revealed, ranging from a mere 2% to 75% compared to research institutes. The presented results introduce new quantitative and qualitative data extracted from primary sources. The analysis uncovers both general and specific per-capita characteristics of the research potential of academic faculty and higher education institutions in Kazakhstan. It reveals significant variances in material-technical provisioning, ranging from a mere 2% to 75% when compared to research institutes. We provide evaluations and recommendations for universities to substantially augment the per-capita characteristics of material-technical provisioning at the level of individual research potential. In the economical aspect, we advise to improve workplace facilities and equipment.","PeriodicalId":154720,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals-ХХI","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals-ХХI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v203-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the pressing challenges confronting higher education institutions in Kazakhstan is the enhancement of the quality of academic and research training for students, particularly at the postgraduate level (PhD). This quality is significantly influenced by the research capabilities of academic faculties. The assessment of academic training involves various factors, including the proficiency level in scientific methodologies exhibited by academic staff and postgraduate students. Economics of material-technical infrastructure plays a pivotal, often decisive role in this training, especially in the realm of natural and technical sciences. The primary goal of our study is to gauge the proficiency levels in scientific methodologies among academic faculty, scrutinize economics of material-technical provisioning of higher education institutions, and to formulate pedagogical and administrative recommendations targeted at the academic staff and management of these institutions. In the presented country case study (Kazakhstan), a comprehensive survey and data collection were carried out, involving 23 higher education institutions, 22 research institutes (spanning the years 2019-2021), and about 800 surveyed academic and research representatives in the fields of humanities, natural-technical sciences, and mathematical disciplines. A pronounced deficiency (82%) was identified in the grasp of scientific methodologies within higher education institutions. Marginal variances were observed between universities and research institutes, as well as between natural-technical and social-humanitarian faculties. Alarmingly lower levels of material-technical provisioning per academic faculty member were revealed, ranging from a mere 2% to 75% compared to research institutes. The presented results introduce new quantitative and qualitative data extracted from primary sources. The analysis uncovers both general and specific per-capita characteristics of the research potential of academic faculty and higher education institutions in Kazakhstan. It reveals significant variances in material-technical provisioning, ranging from a mere 2% to 75% when compared to research institutes. We provide evaluations and recommendations for universities to substantially augment the per-capita characteristics of material-technical provisioning at the level of individual research potential. In the economical aspect, we advise to improve workplace facilities and equipment.
对哈萨克斯坦大学研究人员科学潜力的物质和技术支持的经济分析
哈萨克斯坦高等教育机构面临的紧迫挑战之一是提高学生的学术和研究培训质量,特别是在研究生(博士)阶段。这种质量在很大程度上受到教师研究能力的影响。对学术培训的评估涉及各种因素,包括学术人员和研究生在科学方法方面的熟练程度。物质技术基础设施的经济性在这种培训中起着举足轻重的作用,往往是决定性的,尤其是在自然科学和技术科学领域。我们研究的主要目的是衡量学术人员在科学方法论方面的熟练程度,审查高等教育机构的物质技术供给经济学,并针对这些机构的学术人员和管理层提出教学和管理建议。在所介绍的国家案例研究(哈萨克斯坦)中,开展了一项全面的调查和数据收集工作,涉及 23 所高等教育机构、22 个研究机构(跨度为 2019-2021 年)以及约 800 名接受调查的人文科学、自然技术科学和数学学科领域的学术和研究代表。调查发现,高等教育机构在掌握科学方法方面存在明显不足(82%)。在大学和研究机构之间,以及在自然技术学院和社会人文学院之间,都发现了微小的差异。与研究机构相比,每位学术教师的物质技术供应水平低得惊人,从仅占 2%到 75%不等。本文介绍了从原始资料中提取的新的定量和定性数据。分析揭示了哈萨克斯坦学术教师和高等教育机构研究潜力的一般和具体人均特征。它揭示了物质技术供应方面的巨大差异,与研究机构相比,差异从仅占 2%到 75%不等。我们为大学提供了评估和建议,以在个人研究潜力的层面上大幅提高物质技术供给的人均特点。在经济方面,我们建议改善工作场所的设施和设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信