International scientific collaboration in the research system: dynamics, opportunities and challenges for Kazakhstan

Adylbek Bisenbaev, Maira Sapieva, Оraltay Zholymbayev, Marzhan Galimzhanova
{"title":"International scientific collaboration in the research system: dynamics, opportunities and challenges for Kazakhstan","authors":"Adylbek Bisenbaev, Maira Sapieva, Оraltay Zholymbayev, Marzhan Galimzhanova","doi":"10.21003/ea.v203-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. International scientific collaboration and science diplomacy are essential components of international relations and international law, facilitating cross-cultural interactions at various political, societal, social, humanitarian, and technical levels. The sphere of international scientific collaboration, increasingly intertwined with science diplomacy, holds significant relevance in the realm of global relations and international jurisprudence. It fosters multifaceted exchanges spanning political, societal, humanitarian, and technical domains. In the current epoch, often termed the «International Era,» the dynamics of international scientific collaboration assume heightened importance. This era marks a distinct phase in the evolutionary trajectory of global science, progressing from individual, institutional, to national stages. Methodology. This study delves into the nature and scope of international scientific cooperation involving Kazakhstani scientific entities and researchers. It employs an analytical framework grounded in epistemology and gnoseology, complemented by statistical and correlational analysis. The investigation categorizes the diverse forms and types of international scientific engagements, adopting a synectics approach. It introduces the concept of «commensalism» as a contemporary model of international collaboration in the Kazakhstani scientific context. The paper confronts challenges associated with the saturation of information in scientific publications and introduces the notion of the «dark matter of science.» It proposes hypotheses on the structures, targeted outcomes, and methodologies pertinent to international scientific cooperation. The research employs scientometric data, exemplified through national and academic research scenarios, to establish correlations. It interprets Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall correlation coefficients within the context of scientometric parameters, focusing on publication activities in international scientific collaboration. Results. The study unveils critical insights into the dynamics of international scientific collaboration and its economic implications. Key findings include a positive correlation between the number of joint publications and the H-index across various research fields, with notable variations in research funding and commercialization potential. Engineering, Physics & Astronomy, and Medical Sciences emerge as leading disciplines in terms of joint publication volume, H-index, and economic parameters. In contrast, Social Sciences show a lower level of international collaboration and economic impact, suggesting a more localized research focus. The data also highlights significant economic viability in fields like Materials Science and Environmental Sciences, driven by global emphasis on sustainability and technological advancements. Scientific Novelty. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive analysis of the economic aspects of international scientific collaboration, especially in the context of Kazakhstani research. It bridges the gap in understanding how international collaboration, especially with scientifically advanced countries, impacts not only academic metrics like the H-index but also economic factors such as research funding and commercialization. This study is one of the first to quantitatively analyze these aspects in the Kazakhstani research context, offering a new perspective on the economic benefits and challenges of global scientific partnerships. Practical Significance. This research holds significant practical implications for policy-makers, researchers, and academic institutions in Kazakhstan. By identifying the fields with the highest economic benefits from international collaboration, it provides a strategic roadmap for allocating resources and prioritizing research areas. The findings can guide policy decisions to enhance Kazakhstan’s integration into the global research community, optimize research funding allocation, and harness the commercial potential of scientific advancements. Additionally, it offers insights for individual researchers to strategically collaborate internationally for maximizing their academic impact and economic benefits.","PeriodicalId":154720,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals-ХХI","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals-ХХI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v203-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. International scientific collaboration and science diplomacy are essential components of international relations and international law, facilitating cross-cultural interactions at various political, societal, social, humanitarian, and technical levels. The sphere of international scientific collaboration, increasingly intertwined with science diplomacy, holds significant relevance in the realm of global relations and international jurisprudence. It fosters multifaceted exchanges spanning political, societal, humanitarian, and technical domains. In the current epoch, often termed the «International Era,» the dynamics of international scientific collaboration assume heightened importance. This era marks a distinct phase in the evolutionary trajectory of global science, progressing from individual, institutional, to national stages. Methodology. This study delves into the nature and scope of international scientific cooperation involving Kazakhstani scientific entities and researchers. It employs an analytical framework grounded in epistemology and gnoseology, complemented by statistical and correlational analysis. The investigation categorizes the diverse forms and types of international scientific engagements, adopting a synectics approach. It introduces the concept of «commensalism» as a contemporary model of international collaboration in the Kazakhstani scientific context. The paper confronts challenges associated with the saturation of information in scientific publications and introduces the notion of the «dark matter of science.» It proposes hypotheses on the structures, targeted outcomes, and methodologies pertinent to international scientific cooperation. The research employs scientometric data, exemplified through national and academic research scenarios, to establish correlations. It interprets Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall correlation coefficients within the context of scientometric parameters, focusing on publication activities in international scientific collaboration. Results. The study unveils critical insights into the dynamics of international scientific collaboration and its economic implications. Key findings include a positive correlation between the number of joint publications and the H-index across various research fields, with notable variations in research funding and commercialization potential. Engineering, Physics & Astronomy, and Medical Sciences emerge as leading disciplines in terms of joint publication volume, H-index, and economic parameters. In contrast, Social Sciences show a lower level of international collaboration and economic impact, suggesting a more localized research focus. The data also highlights significant economic viability in fields like Materials Science and Environmental Sciences, driven by global emphasis on sustainability and technological advancements. Scientific Novelty. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive analysis of the economic aspects of international scientific collaboration, especially in the context of Kazakhstani research. It bridges the gap in understanding how international collaboration, especially with scientifically advanced countries, impacts not only academic metrics like the H-index but also economic factors such as research funding and commercialization. This study is one of the first to quantitatively analyze these aspects in the Kazakhstani research context, offering a new perspective on the economic benefits and challenges of global scientific partnerships. Practical Significance. This research holds significant practical implications for policy-makers, researchers, and academic institutions in Kazakhstan. By identifying the fields with the highest economic benefits from international collaboration, it provides a strategic roadmap for allocating resources and prioritizing research areas. The findings can guide policy decisions to enhance Kazakhstan’s integration into the global research community, optimize research funding allocation, and harness the commercial potential of scientific advancements. Additionally, it offers insights for individual researchers to strategically collaborate internationally for maximizing their academic impact and economic benefits.
研究系统中的国际科学合作:哈萨克斯坦的动态、机遇和挑战
导言。国际科学合作和科学外交是国际关系和国际法的重要组成部分,在政治、社会、社 会、人道主义和技术等各个层面促进跨文化互动。国际科学合作领域与科学外交日益交织在一起,在全球关系和国际法学领域具有重要意义。它促进了跨越政治、社会、人道主义和技术领域的多方面交流。在当前这个通常被称为 "国际时代 "的时代,国际科学合作的动态变得更加重要。这一时代标志着全球科学进化轨迹中的一个独特阶段,即从个人、机构到国家的阶段。研究方法。本研究深入探讨了涉及哈萨克斯坦科学实体和研究人员的国际科学合作的性质和范围。它采用了以认识论和认识论为基础的分析框架,并辅以统计和相关分析。调查采用综合联系的方法,对国际科学合作的不同形式和类型进行了分类。它引入了 "共生 "概念,将其作为哈萨克斯坦科学背景下的当代国际合作模式。论文直面科学出版物信息饱和所带来的挑战,提出了 "科学暗物质 "的概念。论文就国际科学合作的结构、目标成果和方法提出了假设。研究采用了科学计量学数据,通过国家和学术研究情景来建立相关性。它在科学计量参数的背景下解释了皮尔逊、斯皮尔曼和肯德尔相关系数,重点是国际科学合作中的出版活动。结果。研究揭示了国际科学合作的动态及其经济影响。主要发现包括:联合出版物的数量与各研究领域的 H 指数呈正相关,而研究经费和商业化潜力则存在明显差异。就联合出版物数量、H 指数和经济参数而言,工程学、物理学和天文学以及医学科学成为领先学科。相比之下,社会科学的国际合作和经济影响水平较低,表明其研究重点更加本地化。数据还显示,在全球对可持续发展和技术进步的重视推动下,材料科学和环境科学等领域具有显著的经济可行性。科学新颖性。这项研究的新颖之处在于它对国际科学合作的经济方面进行了全面分析,特别是在哈萨克斯坦的研究背景下。它弥补了人们在理解国际合作,尤其是与科学先进国家的合作,如何不仅影响 H 指数等学术指标,还影响研究资金和商业化等经济因素方面的空白。本研究是在哈萨克斯坦研究背景下对这些方面进行定量分析的首批研究之一,为了解全球科学合作的经济效益和挑战提供了新的视角。实际意义。这项研究对哈萨克斯坦的政策制定者、研究人员和学术机构具有重要的现实意义。通过确定从国际合作中获得最大经济效益的领域,它为分配资源和优先考虑研究领域提供了战略路线图。研究结果可以指导政策决策,促进哈萨克斯坦融入全球研究界,优化研究资金分配,利用科学进步的商业潜力。此外,它还为研究人员个人开展战略性国际合作提供了见解,以最大限度地提高其学术影响力和经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信