Assessing Passive Leg Raise Test in Pediatric Shock Using Electrical Cardiometry

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Angela Pham, Nikhil R. Shah, Shreya Chandran, Patrick Fueta, Estela O'Daniell, Jessica Burleson, Sarah Cottingham, Halil Sari, Ravi S. Samraj, Utpal Bhalala
{"title":"Assessing Passive Leg Raise Test in Pediatric Shock Using Electrical Cardiometry","authors":"Angela Pham, Nikhil R. Shah, Shreya Chandran, Patrick Fueta, Estela O'Daniell, Jessica Burleson, Sarah Cottingham, Halil Sari, Ravi S. Samraj, Utpal Bhalala","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Passive leg raise (PLR) is widely used to incite an autobolus to assess fluid responsiveness in adults; however, there is a paucity of studies exploring its utility in children. Our study aimed to analyze the efficacy of PLR in determining fluid responsiveness in children presenting with shock using electrical cardiometry. Patients in the age group of 0 to 20 years who presented in shock to our children's hospital emergency department were evaluated. Multiple hemodynamic metrics including, heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, cardiac output (CO), stroke index, stroke volume (SV), flow time corrected (FTC), and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) were recorded using the noninvasive ICON device and compared at baseline and post-PLR. A total of 68 patients had pre- and post-PLR data available for review between June and July 2022. Median age was 7 years (54% male); most common etiology was hypovolemic (67.6%) shock. Following PLR, there was no significant change in most hemodynamic parameters, including SV and CO; however, there was a significant difference in FTC (301 [pre-PLR] vs. 307 [post-PLR], p  = 0.016) (ms) and LVET (232 [pre-PLR] vs. 234 [post-PLR], p  = 0.014) (ms). A significantly higher proportion of children diagnosed with septic shock demonstrated fluid responsiveness (ΔSV ≥ 10% from baseline) compared with those with hypovolemic shock ( p  = 0.036). This study demonstrated no identifiable fluid responsiveness (ΔSV ≥ 10% from baseline) following PLR; however, a significantly higher proportion of children suffering from septic shock demonstrated fluid responsiveness compared with those with hypovolemic shock. Larger studies are needed to further assess the utility of PLR, as well as other modalities, in determining fluid responsiveness in children.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Passive leg raise (PLR) is widely used to incite an autobolus to assess fluid responsiveness in adults; however, there is a paucity of studies exploring its utility in children. Our study aimed to analyze the efficacy of PLR in determining fluid responsiveness in children presenting with shock using electrical cardiometry. Patients in the age group of 0 to 20 years who presented in shock to our children's hospital emergency department were evaluated. Multiple hemodynamic metrics including, heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, cardiac output (CO), stroke index, stroke volume (SV), flow time corrected (FTC), and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) were recorded using the noninvasive ICON device and compared at baseline and post-PLR. A total of 68 patients had pre- and post-PLR data available for review between June and July 2022. Median age was 7 years (54% male); most common etiology was hypovolemic (67.6%) shock. Following PLR, there was no significant change in most hemodynamic parameters, including SV and CO; however, there was a significant difference in FTC (301 [pre-PLR] vs. 307 [post-PLR], p  = 0.016) (ms) and LVET (232 [pre-PLR] vs. 234 [post-PLR], p  = 0.014) (ms). A significantly higher proportion of children diagnosed with septic shock demonstrated fluid responsiveness (ΔSV ≥ 10% from baseline) compared with those with hypovolemic shock ( p  = 0.036). This study demonstrated no identifiable fluid responsiveness (ΔSV ≥ 10% from baseline) following PLR; however, a significantly higher proportion of children suffering from septic shock demonstrated fluid responsiveness compared with those with hypovolemic shock. Larger studies are needed to further assess the utility of PLR, as well as other modalities, in determining fluid responsiveness in children.
使用电子心脏测量法评估小儿休克中的被动抬腿试验
摘要 被动抬腿(PLR)被广泛用于诱发自律神经,以评估成人的体液反应性;但很少有研究探讨其在儿童中的应用。我们的研究旨在分析抬腿运动在使用心电测量法确定休克儿童的液体反应性方面的有效性。我们对儿童医院急诊科的 0 至 20 岁休克患者进行了评估。使用无创 ICON 设备记录了多种血液动力学指标,包括心率、收缩压/舒张压、心输出量(CO)、卒中指数、卒中容积(SV)、血流时间校正(FTC)和左心室射血时间(LVET),并比较了基线和PLR 后的数据。2022年6月至7月期间,共有68名患者的PLR前后数据可供审查。中位年龄为 7 岁(54% 为男性);最常见的病因是低血容量休克(67.6%)。PLR后,包括SV和CO在内的大多数血液动力学参数无明显变化;但FTC(301[PLR前] vs. 307 [PLR后],p = 0.016)(毫秒)和LVET(232[PLR前] vs. 234 [PLR后],p = 0.014)(毫秒)有显著差异。与低血容量性休克患儿相比,确诊为脓毒性休克的患儿中液体反应性(ΔSV 与基线相比≥ 10%)明显更高(p = 0.036)。这项研究表明,PLR 后没有明显的液体反应性(ΔSV 与基线相比≥ 10%);但是,与低血容量性休克患儿相比,脓毒性休克患儿的液体反应性比例明显更高。需要进行更大规模的研究,以进一步评估 PLR 和其他方式在确定儿童输液反应性方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信