The Islamization of Jhon Locke’s Justice Theory: Integration of Islamic Concepts and Jhon Locke’s Theory of Justice

Mohammad Latief, Muhammad Fajar Pramono, Shanaz Nurzaini Bey
{"title":"The Islamization of Jhon Locke’s Justice Theory: Integration of Islamic Concepts and Jhon Locke’s Theory of Justice","authors":"Mohammad Latief, Muhammad Fajar Pramono, Shanaz Nurzaini Bey","doi":"10.28918/hikmatuna.v9i1.951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Study world is faced with inter-community conflict, which creates disparities in social life. From this, John Locke tried to bring up the theory and concept of justice to achieve a prosperous society, but John Locke's theory and concept of justice ended in social capitalism and the behavior of prejudicial others that comes with critics from the Westerns. So, the purpose of writing this paper is to criticize John Locke's theories and concepts of justice with several theories of justice from other scientists, reveal the positive and negative sides of the whole, then only take the positive side. The writing of this paper uses the analytical-descriptive method to describe the theory of justice by John Locke and several other scientists, then analyze it to reach criticism and the positive and negative sides. So then by writing this paper will contribute to the integration of John Locke's concept of justice with including Islamic values. The result of integrating the concept of justice is that John Locke plays a role in expressing that there is a lack of wishful thinking about John Locke's concept of justice and the Islamic concept that can gain prohibition demonstrating that the Islamic law concept can support any tone without compromising any side.","PeriodicalId":436092,"journal":{"name":"HIKMATUNA : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIKMATUNA : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v9i1.951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Study world is faced with inter-community conflict, which creates disparities in social life. From this, John Locke tried to bring up the theory and concept of justice to achieve a prosperous society, but John Locke's theory and concept of justice ended in social capitalism and the behavior of prejudicial others that comes with critics from the Westerns. So, the purpose of writing this paper is to criticize John Locke's theories and concepts of justice with several theories of justice from other scientists, reveal the positive and negative sides of the whole, then only take the positive side. The writing of this paper uses the analytical-descriptive method to describe the theory of justice by John Locke and several other scientists, then analyze it to reach criticism and the positive and negative sides. So then by writing this paper will contribute to the integration of John Locke's concept of justice with including Islamic values. The result of integrating the concept of justice is that John Locke plays a role in expressing that there is a lack of wishful thinking about John Locke's concept of justice and the Islamic concept that can gain prohibition demonstrating that the Islamic law concept can support any tone without compromising any side.
琼-洛克正义理论的伊斯兰化:伊斯兰概念与琼-洛克正义理论的融合
学习世界面临着族群间的冲突,这造成了社会生活的差异。由此,约翰-洛克试图提出正义的理论和概念,以实现一个繁荣的社会,但约翰-洛克的正义理论和概念却以社会资本主义和来自西方批评家的偏见他人的行为而告终。因此,撰写本文的目的是用其他科学家的几种正义理论来批判约翰-洛克的正义理论和理念,揭示其正反两方面的整体,然后只取积极的一面。本文的写作采用了分析描述法,先描述约翰-洛克和其他几位科学家的正义理论,然后对其进行分析,得出批判和正反两方面。因此,通过撰写本文,将有助于把约翰-洛克的正义观与伊斯兰价值观结合起来。整合正义观的结果是,约翰-洛克发挥了作用,表达了约翰-洛克的正义观和伊斯兰教的正义观之间缺乏一厢情愿的关系,而伊斯兰教的正义观可以获得禁止,表明伊斯兰教的法律观可以支持任何基调,而不会损害任何一方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书