Long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute lower limb deep-vein thrombosis combined with May–Thurner syndrome: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Yunfeng Pang, Kailong Li, Xiaoqin Li, Yang Jin, Hao Cai, Fei Shao, Guodong Wang, Chong Ma, Gehua Wen, Ziqiang Sun, Song Jin
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute lower limb deep-vein thrombosis combined with May–Thurner syndrome: A single-center retrospective cohort study","authors":"Yunfeng Pang, Kailong Li, Xiaoqin Li, Yang Jin, Hao Cai, Fei Shao, Guodong Wang, Chong Ma, Gehua Wen, Ziqiang Sun, Song Jin","doi":"10.4103/2589-9686.389883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: May–Thurner syndrome (MTS) is a common cause of lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Stenting is effective in the treatment of MTS; however, there are still complications that may affect the patency of the stent. In addition, the long-term efficacy of stenting remains uncertain. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and prognosis of endovascular treatment of acute proximal DVT with MTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2014 and December 2017, 122 patients with acute symptomatic proximal DVT at our hospital underwent endovascular surgery. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively collected including follow-up information. The analysis used the generalized additive mixed model and Kaplan–Meier curves (log-rank test). RESULTS: Of the 122 patients, 75 underwent only catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and 47 underwent CDT with stent placement. Characteristics such as age (P = 0.630 ) and gender (P = 0.842) did not show significant differences between the two groups. The freedom from target lesion revascularization did not show significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.82). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the Venous Clinical Severity Score and Villalta Score. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of acute lower limb DVT with MTS has good overall efficacy. In young patients with DVT caused by multiple factors besides MTS, prolonged anticoagulation and close follow-up may be more appropriate than primary stenting after thrombus clearance and significant relief of lower limb symptoms.","PeriodicalId":34849,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","volume":"429 1","pages":"67 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2589-9686.389883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: May–Thurner syndrome (MTS) is a common cause of lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Stenting is effective in the treatment of MTS; however, there are still complications that may affect the patency of the stent. In addition, the long-term efficacy of stenting remains uncertain. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and prognosis of endovascular treatment of acute proximal DVT with MTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2014 and December 2017, 122 patients with acute symptomatic proximal DVT at our hospital underwent endovascular surgery. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively collected including follow-up information. The analysis used the generalized additive mixed model and Kaplan–Meier curves (log-rank test). RESULTS: Of the 122 patients, 75 underwent only catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and 47 underwent CDT with stent placement. Characteristics such as age (P = 0.630 ) and gender (P = 0.842) did not show significant differences between the two groups. The freedom from target lesion revascularization did not show significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.82). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the Venous Clinical Severity Score and Villalta Score. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of acute lower limb DVT with MTS has good overall efficacy. In young patients with DVT caused by multiple factors besides MTS, prolonged anticoagulation and close follow-up may be more appropriate than primary stenting after thrombus clearance and significant relief of lower limb symptoms.
急性下肢深静脉血栓形成合并梅-图纳综合征的血管内治疗长期疗效:单中心回顾性队列研究
目的:梅-图纳综合征(MTS)是下肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的常见原因。支架植入术能有效治疗 MTS,但仍有一些并发症可能会影响支架的通畅性。此外,支架植入术的长期疗效仍不确定。这项回顾性研究探讨了急性近端深静脉血栓伴 MTS 的血管内治疗的疗效和预后。材料与方法:2014年6月至2017年12月期间,我院有122例急性症状性近端深静脉血栓患者接受了血管内手术治疗。回顾性收集了患者的临床数据,包括随访信息。分析采用广义相加混合模型和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线(log-rank 检验)。结果:在122例患者中,75例仅接受了导管引导溶栓(CDT)治疗,47例接受了CDT和支架置入治疗。两组患者的年龄(P = 0.630)和性别(P = 0.842)等特征无明显差异。两组患者的靶病变血运重建自由度无明显差异(P = 0.82)。静脉临床严重程度评分和 Villalta 评分在两组间无明显差异。结论使用 MTS 对急性下肢深静脉血栓进行血管内治疗具有良好的总体疗效。对于除 MTS 之外由多种因素导致的深静脉血栓形成的年轻患者,在血栓清除、下肢症状明显缓解后,长期抗凝和密切随访可能比初次支架植入术更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书