Postoperative analgesic effect of hyaluronidase versus dexamethasone as additives to bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: prospective, randomized, and double-blinded controlled study

Hitham M. A. Elsayed, F. Badawy, Mohammed Raheem
{"title":"Postoperative analgesic effect of hyaluronidase versus dexamethasone as additives to bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: prospective, randomized, and double-blinded controlled study","authors":"Hitham M. A. Elsayed, F. Badawy, Mohammed Raheem","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_62_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Inguinal hernia repair is associated with severe postoperative pain. Transversus abdominus plain block has been proved to provide effective analgesia for somatic lower abdominal pain. Several adjuvants have been added to local anesthetic to improve the quality of analgesia. This study compares the additive effect of hyaluronidase versus dexamethasone to improve the quality of analgesia of transversus abdominus plain block for inguinal hernia repair. Patients and methods This prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind study was carried out in Sohag University Hospital between November 2020 and February 2021. Seventy-five participants scheduled for inguinal hernia repair were included and randomly assigned into control, hyaluronidase, and dexamethasone groups. Exclusion criteria were neurological, psychiatric, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic disease, alcoholism or drug abuse, pregnancy or lactating women, and patients receiving adrenoceptor agonist or antagonist therapy or chronic analgesic therapy, patients with morbid obesity, coagulopathy, and known allergy to study medications, and sepsis surgical scar at the site to be operated upon and those who refuse. We targeted from this study to assess time to first analgesia, consumption of morphine, and visual analog scale at rest and during physical activity. Also, we targeted to assess heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, SpO2%, and adverse effects (nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression). Results Our study showed comparable analgesic efficacy for hyaluronidase versus dexamethasone with longer time to the first request of analgesia, less morphine consumption, and less side effects compared with these two groups to the control group. Conclusion Adding hyaluronidase or dexamethasone to bupivacaine not only prolonged the duration of analgesia and decreased the consumption of opioids but also decreased the incidence of adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_62_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Inguinal hernia repair is associated with severe postoperative pain. Transversus abdominus plain block has been proved to provide effective analgesia for somatic lower abdominal pain. Several adjuvants have been added to local anesthetic to improve the quality of analgesia. This study compares the additive effect of hyaluronidase versus dexamethasone to improve the quality of analgesia of transversus abdominus plain block for inguinal hernia repair. Patients and methods This prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind study was carried out in Sohag University Hospital between November 2020 and February 2021. Seventy-five participants scheduled for inguinal hernia repair were included and randomly assigned into control, hyaluronidase, and dexamethasone groups. Exclusion criteria were neurological, psychiatric, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic disease, alcoholism or drug abuse, pregnancy or lactating women, and patients receiving adrenoceptor agonist or antagonist therapy or chronic analgesic therapy, patients with morbid obesity, coagulopathy, and known allergy to study medications, and sepsis surgical scar at the site to be operated upon and those who refuse. We targeted from this study to assess time to first analgesia, consumption of morphine, and visual analog scale at rest and during physical activity. Also, we targeted to assess heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, SpO2%, and adverse effects (nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression). Results Our study showed comparable analgesic efficacy for hyaluronidase versus dexamethasone with longer time to the first request of analgesia, less morphine consumption, and less side effects compared with these two groups to the control group. Conclusion Adding hyaluronidase or dexamethasone to bupivacaine not only prolonged the duration of analgesia and decreased the consumption of opioids but also decreased the incidence of adverse effects.
在腹股沟疝修补术中使用透明质酸酶和地塞米松作为布比卡因的添加剂的术后镇痛效果:前瞻性、随机和双盲对照研究
背景 腹股沟疝修补术会导致严重的术后疼痛。事实证明,腹横肌平块可有效镇痛躯体性下腹疼痛。为了提高镇痛质量,人们在局麻药中添加了多种辅助剂。本研究比较了透明质酸酶与地塞米松在改善腹股沟疝修补术中腹横肌平滑肌阻滞镇痛质量方面的相加效应。患者和方法 这项前瞻性、随机对照和双盲研究于 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 2 月期间在 Sohag 大学医院进行。研究纳入了 75 名计划进行腹股沟疝修补术的患者,并将其随机分配到对照组、透明质酸酶组和地塞米松组。排除标准包括神经、精神、神经肌肉、心血管、肺、肾、肝疾病、酗酒或滥用药物、妊娠或哺乳期妇女、正在接受肾上腺素受体激动剂或拮抗剂治疗或慢性镇痛治疗的患者、病态肥胖、凝血功能障碍、已知对研究药物过敏的患者、手术部位有败血症手术疤痕以及拒绝接受治疗的患者。本研究的目标是评估首次镇痛时间、吗啡消耗量以及静息和体力活动时的视觉模拟量表。此外,我们还对心率、无创血压、SpO2% 和不良反应(恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制)进行了评估。结果 我们的研究显示,透明质酸酶与地塞米松的镇痛效果相当,与对照组相比,两组患者首次要求镇痛的时间更长,吗啡用量更少,副作用更小。结论 在布比卡因中加入透明质酸酶或地塞米松不仅能延长镇痛时间,减少阿片类药物的用量,还能降低不良反应的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信