A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients

Q4 Nursing
Ji Kwon, Ki Lee, Sang Lee, Yong Kim, Sung Shin
{"title":"A new formula for selecting the size of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients","authors":"Ji Kwon, Ki Lee, Sang Lee, Yong Kim, Sung Shin","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_118_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Choosing an appropriate endotracheal tube size during the first attempt is crucial for avoiding unnecessary reintubation. Previous studies on endotracheal tube size in children focused on uncuffed tubes. Following recent studies on pediatric airway anatomy, cuffed endotracheal tubes are increasingly utilized in children. The objective of our study was to develop a new formula for selecting the correctly sized cuffed endotracheal tube for pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: We examined the electronic anesthetic records of 465 pediatric patients who received elective ophthalmic surgery between January 2011 and December 2018. Multiple linear regression was used to identify potential predictors of cuffed endotracheal size among age, weight, height, body mass index, and the presence of underweight, overweight, and obesity. We used repeated-measures ANOVA to assess the difference between the actual and calculated sizes of the endotracheal tube. Results: The derived formula is as follows: Predicted endotracheal tube size (mm) = 3.7 + 0.1 × age (years) + 0.02 × weight (kg) + 0.1 × presence of overweight (0: negative, 1: positive). The coefficient of determination (R2) for the total population was 0.685 and was higher in the overweight group (R2 = 0.763). When compared with the three conventional age-based formulas (Cole’s, Khine’s, and Duracher’s formula), the difference between the actual endotracheal tube size and the endotracheal tube size calculated using Duracher’s formula was the smallest. Conclusions: In choosing the appropriate size of a cuffed endotracheal tube in children, age and body size should be considered.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"114 1","pages":"141 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_118_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Choosing an appropriate endotracheal tube size during the first attempt is crucial for avoiding unnecessary reintubation. Previous studies on endotracheal tube size in children focused on uncuffed tubes. Following recent studies on pediatric airway anatomy, cuffed endotracheal tubes are increasingly utilized in children. The objective of our study was to develop a new formula for selecting the correctly sized cuffed endotracheal tube for pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: We examined the electronic anesthetic records of 465 pediatric patients who received elective ophthalmic surgery between January 2011 and December 2018. Multiple linear regression was used to identify potential predictors of cuffed endotracheal size among age, weight, height, body mass index, and the presence of underweight, overweight, and obesity. We used repeated-measures ANOVA to assess the difference between the actual and calculated sizes of the endotracheal tube. Results: The derived formula is as follows: Predicted endotracheal tube size (mm) = 3.7 + 0.1 × age (years) + 0.02 × weight (kg) + 0.1 × presence of overweight (0: negative, 1: positive). The coefficient of determination (R2) for the total population was 0.685 and was higher in the overweight group (R2 = 0.763). When compared with the three conventional age-based formulas (Cole’s, Khine’s, and Duracher’s formula), the difference between the actual endotracheal tube size and the endotracheal tube size calculated using Duracher’s formula was the smallest. Conclusions: In choosing the appropriate size of a cuffed endotracheal tube in children, age and body size should be considered.
选择儿科患者气管插管尺寸的新公式
背景:首次尝试时选择合适的气管导管尺寸对于避免不必要的再次插管至关重要。以往关于儿童气管导管尺寸的研究主要集中在无袖带气管导管上。随着最近对儿童气道解剖学的研究,带袖带的气管导管在儿童中的应用越来越广泛。我们的研究目的是为儿童患者选择正确尺寸的带袖带气管导管制定新的公式。材料和方法:我们检查了 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受眼科择期手术的 465 名儿科患者的电子麻醉记录。我们使用多元线性回归在年龄、体重、身高、体重指数以及是否存在体重不足、超重和肥胖中找出袖带气管大小的潜在预测因素。我们使用重复测量方差分析来评估气管导管实际尺寸与计算尺寸之间的差异。结果如下得出的公式如下预测气管导管尺寸(毫米)= 3.7 + 0.1 × 年龄(岁)+ 0.02 × 体重(千克)+ 0.1 × 是否超重(0:负值,1:正值)。总人口的决定系数(R2)为 0.685,超重组的决定系数更高(R2 = 0.763)。与三种基于年龄的传统公式(Cole 公式、Khine 公式和 Duracher 公式)相比,实际气管导管尺寸与使用 Duracher 公式计算出的气管导管尺寸之间的差异最小。结论在为儿童选择合适的袖带式气管导管尺寸时,应考虑年龄和体型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信