Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups

Tamer Habib, A. Fayed, Mohamed Marouf, Islam Ahmed
{"title":"Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups","authors":"Tamer Habib, A. Fayed, Mohamed Marouf, Islam Ahmed","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_18_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Although septic shock mortality has decreased lately due to better identification and timely application of therapies. Research has continued for 20 years, but no therapies have been discovered yet to change sepsis’s course once it is infected. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock grouped into various pretargeted heart rate (HR) groups. Methods Septic shock patients (n=90) were randomly assigned directly after the resuscitation into 3 groups (30 in each). Then, treatment with metoprolol tartrate was started. The dose of metoprolol was 25-150 mg every 12 h and increased gradually to reach the pretargeted HR group range; group A (HR = 60-70 beats/min), group B (HR = 71-80 beats/min), and group C (HR = 81-90 beats/min). Metoprolol was continued to maintain the targeted HR till either discharge form intensive care unit (ICU) or death. The primary outcomes measured were mean arterial pressure (MAP), mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), serum lactate, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Results After 1 day, group A (60-70 beats/min) had a significantly higher MAP (61.73±6.39 mmHg) than group B (51.33±7.76 mmHg) and group C (52.0±7.14 mmHg) (P < 0.001). After 3 days, group A had a significantly improved SvO2, lower serum lactate, and lower SOFA score than the other groups (all P < 0.05). When compared with groups B and C, group A had decreased norepinephrine (NE) requirements (P < 0.001) and shorter ICU stay (P = 0.001). Conclusion Targeting HR between 60-70 beats/min using metoprolol tartrate, when compared with higher targets in septic shock after hemodynamic stabilization, was not associated with profound hypotension but also with earlier improved MAP, tissue perfusion measured as SvO2 and serum lactate, and organ failure measured as the SOFA score. It also showed decreased Norepinephrine requirements and a shorter ICU stay, but with no 28-day mortality benefit.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_18_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Although septic shock mortality has decreased lately due to better identification and timely application of therapies. Research has continued for 20 years, but no therapies have been discovered yet to change sepsis’s course once it is infected. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock grouped into various pretargeted heart rate (HR) groups. Methods Septic shock patients (n=90) were randomly assigned directly after the resuscitation into 3 groups (30 in each). Then, treatment with metoprolol tartrate was started. The dose of metoprolol was 25-150 mg every 12 h and increased gradually to reach the pretargeted HR group range; group A (HR = 60-70 beats/min), group B (HR = 71-80 beats/min), and group C (HR = 81-90 beats/min). Metoprolol was continued to maintain the targeted HR till either discharge form intensive care unit (ICU) or death. The primary outcomes measured were mean arterial pressure (MAP), mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), serum lactate, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Results After 1 day, group A (60-70 beats/min) had a significantly higher MAP (61.73±6.39 mmHg) than group B (51.33±7.76 mmHg) and group C (52.0±7.14 mmHg) (P < 0.001). After 3 days, group A had a significantly improved SvO2, lower serum lactate, and lower SOFA score than the other groups (all P < 0.05). When compared with groups B and C, group A had decreased norepinephrine (NE) requirements (P < 0.001) and shorter ICU stay (P = 0.001). Conclusion Targeting HR between 60-70 beats/min using metoprolol tartrate, when compared with higher targets in septic shock after hemodynamic stabilization, was not associated with profound hypotension but also with earlier improved MAP, tissue perfusion measured as SvO2 and serum lactate, and organ failure measured as the SOFA score. It also showed decreased Norepinephrine requirements and a shorter ICU stay, but with no 28-day mortality benefit.
酒石酸美托洛尔肠溶片对不同预设心率组脓毒性休克患者血液动力学和临床预后的作用
导言 尽管由于更好地识别和及时应用疗法,脓毒性休克的死亡率近来有所下降。20 年来,相关研究一直在进行,但尚未发现能改变脓毒症感染后病程的疗法。目的 本研究旨在评估酒石酸美托洛尔肠溶片对不同预设心率(HR)组脓毒性休克患者血液动力学和临床预后的影响。方法 将复苏后的脓毒性休克患者(90 人)直接随机分为 3 组(每组 30 人)。然后开始使用酒石酸美托洛尔治疗。美托洛尔的剂量为每 12 小时 25-150 毫克,并逐渐增加,以达到预设的心率组范围:A 组(心率 = 60-70 次/分)、B 组(心率 = 71-80 次/分)和 C 组(心率 = 81-90 次/分)。在重症监护室(ICU)出院或死亡前,继续使用美托洛尔维持目标心率。测量的主要结果包括平均动脉压(MAP)、混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)、血清乳酸和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。结果 1 天后,A 组(60-70 次/分)的 MAP(61.73±6.39 mmHg)明显高于 B 组(51.33±7.76 mmHg)和 C 组(52.0±7.14 mmHg)(P <0.001)。3 天后,A 组的 SvO2 显著改善,血清乳酸降低,SOFA 评分也低于其他组(均 P <0.05)。与 B 组和 C 组相比,A 组的去甲肾上腺素(NE)需求量减少(P < 0.001),重症监护室住院时间缩短(P = 0.001)。结论 在血液动力学稳定后,使用酒石酸美托洛尔将心率控制在 60-70 次/分之间,与脓毒性休克患者更高的心率目标相比,不仅不会导致严重低血压,还能更早地改善 MAP、以 SvO2 和血清乳酸盐衡量的组织灌注以及以 SOFA 评分衡量的器官衰竭。该疗法还能减少去甲肾上腺素的需求量,缩短重症监护室的住院时间,但对 28 天的死亡率没有益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信