Phenylephrine, ondansetron, or combination of both for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A prospective, double-blind randomized control trial

Q4 Nursing
Vikram Bedi, Pratibha Yadav, B. Bairwa, Santosh Choudhary, Naveen Kumar, Gayatri Deshpande
{"title":"Phenylephrine, ondansetron, or combination of both for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A prospective, double-blind randomized control trial","authors":"Vikram Bedi, Pratibha Yadav, B. Bairwa, Santosh Choudhary, Naveen Kumar, Gayatri Deshpande","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_105_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) are common complications in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) under subarachnoid block. This study aimed to compare the combination of phenylephrine and ondansetron with ondansetron and phenylephrine alone in preventing IONV in patients undergoing LSCS under subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized, comparative study included 195 patients posted for elective LSCS under subarachnoid block. They were randomly allocated into three groups of 65 each. Group A received phenylephrine (25 mcg/min) and ondansetron 4 mg, group B received phenylephrine (25 mcg/min), and group C received only ondansetron 4 mg. Primary outcome measured was the incidence of IONV. Secondary outcomes measured were hemodynamic parameters, incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and vasopressor requirement. Categorical data were presented as numbers (proportion) and compared using the Chi-square test. Results: The proportion of subjects who experienced IONV was highest in group C (24.6%) compared with groups A (9.2%) and B (10.7%) (P = 0.025). The mean number of episodes of IONV was significantly lower in patients who received a combination of phenylephrine and ondansetron compared with phenylephrine or ondansetron (0.126 ± 0.42 vs. 0.107 ± 0.312 vs. 0.307 ± 0.58; P = 0.0233). The number of episodes of intraoperative hypotension was significantly high in group C (0.23 ± 0.49) compared with other groups (P = 0.041). Conclusion: Infusion of 25 mcg/min of phenylephrine with 4 mg ondansetron and infusion of 25 mcg/min of phenylephrine alone reduce the incidence of IONV in patients undergoing elective LSCS under subarachnoid block when compared with ondansetron alone.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"145 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_105_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) are common complications in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) under subarachnoid block. This study aimed to compare the combination of phenylephrine and ondansetron with ondansetron and phenylephrine alone in preventing IONV in patients undergoing LSCS under subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized, comparative study included 195 patients posted for elective LSCS under subarachnoid block. They were randomly allocated into three groups of 65 each. Group A received phenylephrine (25 mcg/min) and ondansetron 4 mg, group B received phenylephrine (25 mcg/min), and group C received only ondansetron 4 mg. Primary outcome measured was the incidence of IONV. Secondary outcomes measured were hemodynamic parameters, incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and vasopressor requirement. Categorical data were presented as numbers (proportion) and compared using the Chi-square test. Results: The proportion of subjects who experienced IONV was highest in group C (24.6%) compared with groups A (9.2%) and B (10.7%) (P = 0.025). The mean number of episodes of IONV was significantly lower in patients who received a combination of phenylephrine and ondansetron compared with phenylephrine or ondansetron (0.126 ± 0.42 vs. 0.107 ± 0.312 vs. 0.307 ± 0.58; P = 0.0233). The number of episodes of intraoperative hypotension was significantly high in group C (0.23 ± 0.49) compared with other groups (P = 0.041). Conclusion: Infusion of 25 mcg/min of phenylephrine with 4 mg ondansetron and infusion of 25 mcg/min of phenylephrine alone reduce the incidence of IONV in patients undergoing elective LSCS under subarachnoid block when compared with ondansetron alone.
苯肾上腺素、昂丹司琼或二者联合用于预防下段剖宫产术患者术中恶心和呕吐:前瞻性双盲随机对照试验
背景:术中恶心和呕吐(IONV)是蛛网膜下腔阻滞下行剖宫产术(LSCS)患者常见的并发症。本研究旨在比较苯肾上腺素和昂丹司琼联合用药与昂丹司琼和苯肾上腺素单独用药在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下进行 LSCS 的患者中预防 IONV 的效果。材料与方法:这项前瞻性、双盲、随机、对比研究纳入了 195 名在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下接受择期 LSCS 的患者。他们被随机分为三组,每组 65 人。A 组接受苯肾上腺素(25 微克/分钟)和昂丹司琼 4 毫克,B 组接受苯肾上腺素(25 微克/分钟),C 组仅接受昂丹司琼 4 毫克。测量的主要结果是 IONV 发生率。次要测量结果为血液动力学参数、术中低血压发生率和血管加压剂需求量。分类数据以数字(比例)表示,并使用卡方检验进行比较。结果与 A 组(9.2%)和 B 组(10.7%)相比,C 组出现 IONV 的比例最高(24.6%)(P = 0.025)。与苯肾上腺素或昂丹司琼相比,接受苯肾上腺素和昂丹司琼联合疗法的患者发生 IONV 的平均次数明显降低(0.126 ± 0.42 vs. 0.107 ± 0.312 vs. 0.307 ± 0.58;P = 0.0233)。与其他组相比,C 组术中低血压发作次数明显较高(0.23 ± 0.49)(P = 0.041)。结论与单独使用昂丹司琼相比,在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下输注 25 微克/分钟的苯肾上腺素和 4 毫克昂丹司琼以及单独输注 25 微克/分钟的苯肾上腺素可降低择期 LSCS 患者的 IONV 发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信