Reflectance spectroscopy in the prediction of soil organic carbon associated with humic substances

Sharon Gomes Ribeiro, Marcio Regys Rabelo de Oliveira, Letícia Machado Lopes, M. Costa, Raul Shiso Toma, I. Araújo, L. C. J. Moreira, Adunias dos Santos Teixeira
{"title":"Reflectance spectroscopy in the prediction of soil organic carbon associated with humic substances","authors":"Sharon Gomes Ribeiro, Marcio Regys Rabelo de Oliveira, Letícia Machado Lopes, M. Costa, Raul Shiso Toma, I. Araújo, L. C. J. Moreira, Adunias dos Santos Teixeira","doi":"10.36783/18069657rbcs20220143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Understanding organic carbon and predominant humic fractions in the soil allows contributes to soil quality management. Conventional fractionation techniques require time, excessive sampling, and high maintenance costs. In this study, predictive models for organic carbon in humic substances (HS) were evaluated using hyperspectral data as an alternative to chemical fractionation and quantification by wet digestion. Twenty-nine samples of Neossolos Flúvicos (Fluvents) - A1, and 36 samples of Cambissolos (Inceptisols) - A2 were used. The samples were also analyzed jointly, creating a third sample group - A1&A2. Untransformed spectral reflectance factors were obtained using the FieldSpec Pro FR 3 hyperspectral sensor (350–2500 nm). Pre-processing techniques were employed, including Savitzky–Golay smoothing and first-and second-order derivative analysis. After selecting variables using the Backward method, which removes spectral variables that are not statistically significant for the regression. Estimation models were built by Principal Components Regression (PCR) and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR). The spectral data were evaluated individually for soil classes A1 and A2, and jointly for A1&A2. The PLSR was more efficient than PCR, especially for the estimation models that used the first derivative of reflectance employing the three sample groups. For samples of A1, the best estimate was seen for humic acid (RPD = 6.09) and humin (RPD = 2.38); for A2, the best models estimated the OC in fulvic acid (RPD = 2.35) and humin (RPD = 2.51); and for the joint spectral data (A1&A2), the prediction was robust for humin only (RPD = 2.01). The most representative wavelengths were observed using the first derivative with PLSR and PCR, centred on the region between 1600 and 1800 nm. The first-derivative of reflectance calculated more-robust predictive models using PLSR than PCR. The best predictions occurred for organic carbon associated with humic acid in","PeriodicalId":21219,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36783/18069657rbcs20220143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Understanding organic carbon and predominant humic fractions in the soil allows contributes to soil quality management. Conventional fractionation techniques require time, excessive sampling, and high maintenance costs. In this study, predictive models for organic carbon in humic substances (HS) were evaluated using hyperspectral data as an alternative to chemical fractionation and quantification by wet digestion. Twenty-nine samples of Neossolos Flúvicos (Fluvents) - A1, and 36 samples of Cambissolos (Inceptisols) - A2 were used. The samples were also analyzed jointly, creating a third sample group - A1&A2. Untransformed spectral reflectance factors were obtained using the FieldSpec Pro FR 3 hyperspectral sensor (350–2500 nm). Pre-processing techniques were employed, including Savitzky–Golay smoothing and first-and second-order derivative analysis. After selecting variables using the Backward method, which removes spectral variables that are not statistically significant for the regression. Estimation models were built by Principal Components Regression (PCR) and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR). The spectral data were evaluated individually for soil classes A1 and A2, and jointly for A1&A2. The PLSR was more efficient than PCR, especially for the estimation models that used the first derivative of reflectance employing the three sample groups. For samples of A1, the best estimate was seen for humic acid (RPD = 6.09) and humin (RPD = 2.38); for A2, the best models estimated the OC in fulvic acid (RPD = 2.35) and humin (RPD = 2.51); and for the joint spectral data (A1&A2), the prediction was robust for humin only (RPD = 2.01). The most representative wavelengths were observed using the first derivative with PLSR and PCR, centred on the region between 1600 and 1800 nm. The first-derivative of reflectance calculated more-robust predictive models using PLSR than PCR. The best predictions occurred for organic carbon associated with humic acid in
反射光谱法在预测与腐殖质有关的土壤有机碳方面的应用
:了解土壤中的有机碳和主要腐殖质组分有助于土壤质量管理。传统的分馏技术需要时间、过多的采样和高昂的维护成本。在这项研究中,利用高光谱数据对腐殖质(HS)中的有机碳预测模型进行了评估,以替代化学分馏和湿法消化定量。研究中使用了 29 个 Neossolos Flúvicos(Fluvents)- A1 样本和 36 个 Cambissolos(Inceptisols)- A2 样本。这些样本还进行了联合分析,形成了第三组样本--A1&A2。使用 FieldSpec Pro FR 3 高光谱传感器(350-2500 nm)获得了未转换的光谱反射系数。采用了预处理技术,包括萨维茨基-戈莱平滑和一阶二阶导数分析。在使用回溯法选择变量后,剔除了回归统计意义不大的光谱变量。通过主成分回归(PCR)和部分最小二乘法回归(PLSR)建立了估计模型。分别对土壤类别 A1 和 A2 的光谱数据进行了评估,并对 A1&A2 的光谱数据进行了联合评估。PLSR 比 PCR 更有效,尤其是在使用三个样本组的反射率一阶导数的估算模型中。对于 A1 样本,腐植酸(RPD = 6.09)和腐植质(RPD = 2.38)的估算结果最佳;对于 A2 样本,富营养化酸(RPD = 2.35)和腐植质(RPD = 2.51)的 OC 估算结果最佳;对于联合光谱数据(A1&A2),仅腐植质的预测结果较好(RPD = 2.01)。使用 PLSR 和 PCR 的一阶导数观测到的最具代表性的波长集中在 1600 和 1800 nm 之间。与 PCR 相比,反射率的一阶导数使用 PLSR 计算出的预测模型更为可靠。对腐殖酸相关的有机碳的预测效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信