Corporate Human Rights Responsibilities: Rethinking the Public-Private Divide

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Janne Mende
{"title":"Corporate Human Rights Responsibilities: Rethinking the Public-Private Divide","authors":"Janne Mende","doi":"10.1080/18918131.2023.2254969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This framing paper to the special issue deals with one of the key human rights challenges today: the effective regulation of business in a globalized economy and the expansion of the roles corporate actors play beyond the private realm. It discusses three ideal-typical approaches to the public-private divide that characterizes the human rights responsibilities of corporations. First, the dichotomy approach is based on a classic dichotomous view, emphasizing the essential differences between public human rights duties and private actors’ responsibilities. Second, the blurring approach challenges this dichotomy by blurring or erasing the boundaries between public and private. The third approach, which is called the mediation approach and is elaborated in this framing paper, responds to the strengths and weaknesses of the dichotomy and the blurring approaches. It, too, challenges the public-private dichotomy, but does so by taking into consideration the mutual constitution of the two categories. At the same time it keeps them distinct rather than blending them together. This approach acknowledges the added value of conceptually, empirically, and normatively distinguishing between public and private, while taking the limitations of a dichotomous view into account. It thus provides new avenues for rethinking corporate responsibilities for human rights within and beyond the public-private divide.","PeriodicalId":42311,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","volume":"34 1","pages":"255 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2023.2254969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This framing paper to the special issue deals with one of the key human rights challenges today: the effective regulation of business in a globalized economy and the expansion of the roles corporate actors play beyond the private realm. It discusses three ideal-typical approaches to the public-private divide that characterizes the human rights responsibilities of corporations. First, the dichotomy approach is based on a classic dichotomous view, emphasizing the essential differences between public human rights duties and private actors’ responsibilities. Second, the blurring approach challenges this dichotomy by blurring or erasing the boundaries between public and private. The third approach, which is called the mediation approach and is elaborated in this framing paper, responds to the strengths and weaknesses of the dichotomy and the blurring approaches. It, too, challenges the public-private dichotomy, but does so by taking into consideration the mutual constitution of the two categories. At the same time it keeps them distinct rather than blending them together. This approach acknowledges the added value of conceptually, empirically, and normatively distinguishing between public and private, while taking the limitations of a dichotomous view into account. It thus provides new avenues for rethinking corporate responsibilities for human rights within and beyond the public-private divide.
企业的人权责任:反思公私分歧
ABSTRACT 本特刊的框架论文探讨了当今人权方面的主要挑战之一:如何在全球化经济中有效监管企业,以及企业行为者在私人领域之外所扮演角色的扩展。论文讨论了三种理想的典型方法,以解决企业人权责任中的公私分歧问题。首先,二分法基于典型的二分法观点,强调公共人权义务与私人行为者责任之间的本质区别。其次,模糊法通过模糊或消除公共与私人之间的界限,对这种二分法提出挑战。第三种方法被称为 "调解方法",本框架文件对其进行了阐述,它对二分法和模糊法的优缺点做出了回应。它也对公私二分法提出了挑战,但考虑到了这两个类别的相互构成。与此同时,它将两者区分开来,而不是混为一谈。这种方法承认从概念上、经验上和规范上区分公私的附加价值,同时考虑到二分法的局限性。因此,它为重新思考公私界限内外的企业人权责任提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Human Rights
Nordic Journal of Human Rights POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Nordic Journal of Human Rights is the Nordic countries’ leading forum for analyses, debate and information about human rights. The Journal’s aim is to provide a cutting-edge forum for international academic critique and analysis in the field of human rights. The Journal takes a broad view of human rights, and wishes to publish high quality and cross-disciplinary analyses and comments on the past, current and future status of human rights for profound collective reflection. It was first issued in 1982 and is published by the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights at the University of Oslo in collaboration with Nordic research centres for human rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信