Global Termination and Recurrence Macro Trends: A Follow-Up to Licklider and Dixon

IF 1.2 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Jason Quinn, Matthew Hauenstein
{"title":"Global Termination and Recurrence Macro Trends: A Follow-Up to Licklider and Dixon","authors":"Jason Quinn, Matthew Hauenstein","doi":"10.1080/13698249.2023.2249322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this Special 25th Anniversary Issue, we (re)examine several macro historical trends concerning civil war termination and recurrence that were raised in the journal’s first issue by Roy Licklider and then followed-up on 10 years later by Jeffrey Dixon. These trends have to do with: (1) the global prevalence of recurrence; (2) the global prevalence of termination types; (3) patterns of recurrence by termination type, and (4) post-conflict patterns of civilian victimisation by termination type. With the advantage of more comprehensive and more systematised data, the analysis identifies several structural breaks in termination and recurrence trends, as well as differences in how outcomes regulate the inflow and outflow of fighting groups in countries. Over decades, conflict recurrence has been becoming more and more concentrated in a smaller subset of countries, and the majority of conflict recurrences are caused by new groups and not by previously terminated groups. Around 59 per cent of recurrences following peace accords are caused by new groups with no prior appearance in the conflict record, while 71 per cent of recurrences following government victory are caused by new groups. Since 2010, termination rates have declined by 25 per cent and recurrence rates have risen 44 per cent compared to the period 1990–2009. In addition, new conflicts entering the system after 2010 are up 150 per cent. As a result of these macro trends, the number of ongoing civil wars in the world is currently at an all time high.","PeriodicalId":51785,"journal":{"name":"Civil Wars","volume":"26 1","pages":"268 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2023.2249322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this Special 25th Anniversary Issue, we (re)examine several macro historical trends concerning civil war termination and recurrence that were raised in the journal’s first issue by Roy Licklider and then followed-up on 10 years later by Jeffrey Dixon. These trends have to do with: (1) the global prevalence of recurrence; (2) the global prevalence of termination types; (3) patterns of recurrence by termination type, and (4) post-conflict patterns of civilian victimisation by termination type. With the advantage of more comprehensive and more systematised data, the analysis identifies several structural breaks in termination and recurrence trends, as well as differences in how outcomes regulate the inflow and outflow of fighting groups in countries. Over decades, conflict recurrence has been becoming more and more concentrated in a smaller subset of countries, and the majority of conflict recurrences are caused by new groups and not by previously terminated groups. Around 59 per cent of recurrences following peace accords are caused by new groups with no prior appearance in the conflict record, while 71 per cent of recurrences following government victory are caused by new groups. Since 2010, termination rates have declined by 25 per cent and recurrence rates have risen 44 per cent compared to the period 1990–2009. In addition, new conflicts entering the system after 2010 are up 150 per cent. As a result of these macro trends, the number of ongoing civil wars in the world is currently at an all time high.
全球终止和复发宏观趋势:Licklider 和 Dixon 的后续文章
ABSTRACT 在这期 25 周年特刊中,我们(重新)研究了罗伊-利克莱德(Roy Licklider)在本刊创刊号上提出、杰弗里-迪克森(Jeffrey Dixon)在 10 年后跟进的有关内战终止和复发的几个宏观历史趋势。这些趋势涉及(1) 全球复发的普遍程度;(2) 全球终止类型的普遍程度;(3) 按终止类型划分的复发模式;(4) 按终止类型划分的冲突后平民受害模式。凭借更全面、更系统化的数据优势,分析确定了终止和复发趋势中的若干结构性断裂,以及结果如何调节各国战斗团体流入和流出的差异。几十年来,冲突复发越来越集中在一小部分国家,而且大多数冲突复发是由新的团体而不是以前终止的团体造成的。在和平协议签署后再次爆发的冲突中,约有 59%是由以前没有冲突记录的新团体引起的,而在政府获胜后再次爆发的冲突中,71%是由新团体引起的。自 2010 年以来,与 1990-2009 年期间相比,终止率下降了 25%,复发率上升了 44%。此外,2010 年后进入系统的新冲突增加了 150%。由于这些宏观趋势,目前世界上正在进行的内战数量达到了历史最高水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Civil Wars
Civil Wars POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信