COMPARISON OF THE LEVEL OF BURNOUT AMONG THE ACADEMIC AND CLINICAL PHYSICAL THERAPISTS

Mamoona Tasleem Afzal, Zainab Tariq, S. Batool, Muhammad Shakir Khan, Saad Tariq, Mubara Rehman
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE LEVEL OF BURNOUT AMONG THE ACADEMIC AND CLINICAL PHYSICAL THERAPISTS","authors":"Mamoona Tasleem Afzal, Zainab Tariq, S. Batool, Muhammad Shakir Khan, Saad Tariq, Mubara Rehman","doi":"10.36283/pjr.zu.12.2/011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims of Study: To compare the level of burnout among the academic and clinical physical therapists. Methodology: A cross sectional study was conducted from August 2019 to January 2020. Data was collected from physical therapists working in the universities and hospitals of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Data was collected from 278 participants. Maslach burnout inventory scale was used to measure the level of burnout which was analyzed using SPSS statistics 21. Results: The mean value of emotional exhaustion for clinical physical therapists was 20.02 ± 8.08 and for academic physical therapist was 18.6 ± 6.57 with significant p value (p˂0.05). The mean value for depersonalization for clinical physical therapists was 9.22 ± 5.17 and for academic 9.29 ± 5.07 with significant p value (p˂0.05). The mean value of personal accomplishment for clinical physical therapists and academic physical therapists was 35.43 ± 7.715 and 35.74 ± 6.49 respectively with non-significant p value (p˃0.05). Limitations and Future Implications: It was conducted for specific time period which not record the overall or yearly impact of burnout on participants. So time lapse and longitudinal study should be done. Originality: The clinical physical therapists have increased level of burnout than academic physical therapists. Conclusion: The clinical physical therapists have increased level of burnout than academic physical therapists.","PeriodicalId":191321,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjr.zu.12.2/011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims of Study: To compare the level of burnout among the academic and clinical physical therapists. Methodology: A cross sectional study was conducted from August 2019 to January 2020. Data was collected from physical therapists working in the universities and hospitals of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Data was collected from 278 participants. Maslach burnout inventory scale was used to measure the level of burnout which was analyzed using SPSS statistics 21. Results: The mean value of emotional exhaustion for clinical physical therapists was 20.02 ± 8.08 and for academic physical therapist was 18.6 ± 6.57 with significant p value (p˂0.05). The mean value for depersonalization for clinical physical therapists was 9.22 ± 5.17 and for academic 9.29 ± 5.07 with significant p value (p˂0.05). The mean value of personal accomplishment for clinical physical therapists and academic physical therapists was 35.43 ± 7.715 and 35.74 ± 6.49 respectively with non-significant p value (p˃0.05). Limitations and Future Implications: It was conducted for specific time period which not record the overall or yearly impact of burnout on participants. So time lapse and longitudinal study should be done. Originality: The clinical physical therapists have increased level of burnout than academic physical therapists. Conclusion: The clinical physical therapists have increased level of burnout than academic physical therapists.
比较学术物理治疗师和临床物理治疗师的职业倦怠程度
研究目的比较学术物理治疗师和临床物理治疗师的职业倦怠程度。 研究方法:于 2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 1 月进行了一项横断面研究。数据收集对象是在拉瓦尔品第和伊斯兰堡的大学和医院工作的物理治疗师。共收集了 278 名参与者的数据。使用马斯拉赫职业倦怠量表测量职业倦怠水平,并使用 SPSS 统计 21 进行分析。 结果临床物理治疗师的情绪衰竭平均值为 20.02 ± 8.08,学术物理治疗师的情绪衰竭平均值为 18.6 ± 6.57,P 值显著(p˂0.05)。临床物理治疗师的人格解体平均值为 9.22 ± 5.17,学术物理治疗师的人格解体平均值为 9.29 ± 5.07,p 值显著(p˂0.05)。临床物理治疗师和学术物理治疗师的个人成就感平均值分别为 35.43 ± 7.715 和 35.74 ± 6.49,P 值不显著(p˂0.05)。 局限性和未来影响:该研究针对特定时间段进行,没有记录职业倦怠对参与者的整体或年度影响。因此,应进行时间推移和纵向研究。 原创性:临床物理治疗师的职业倦怠程度高于学术物理治疗师。 结论:临床物理治疗师的职业倦怠程度高于学术物理治疗师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信