Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Anlatı Türü ve Kadın Gotiği: Angela Carter’ın “Kanlı Oda” ve Charlotte Perkins Gilman’ın “Sarı Duvar Kağıdı” Öykülerinde Ataerkil Normlara Direniş

Barış Ağir
{"title":"Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Anlatı Türü ve Kadın Gotiği: Angela Carter’ın “Kanlı Oda” ve Charlotte Perkins Gilman’ın “Sarı Duvar Kağıdı” Öykülerinde Ataerkil Normlara Direniş","authors":"Barış Ağir","doi":"10.23834/isrjournal.1292294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The female gothic reinterprets works by female authors by fusing feminism and the study of gothic literature. In actuality, it represents a significant advancement in the study of gender in Gothic literature. In works written in the gothic style by women, the oppression of women in patriarchal society is reflected, and the destruction of women at the hands of patriarchy is emphasized throughout gothic art; in this sense, the resilience of the female gothic protagonists in the face of adversity symbolizes their maturation as women. Based on this context, this research attempts to compare \"The Bloody Chamber\" by Angela Carter with \"The Yellow Wallpaper\" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman from the standpoint of the feminine Gothic fiction. The dark tragedies that await women in patriarchal culture are explored by Carter and Gilman in ways that transcend beyond the normal boundaries of the gothic genre. By contrasting the narratives, this study aims to show how women begin to question and even demolish patriarchal chauvinism and move away from their subservient position in patriarchal society.","PeriodicalId":274866,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of International Scientific Researches","volume":"373 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of International Scientific Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.1292294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The female gothic reinterprets works by female authors by fusing feminism and the study of gothic literature. In actuality, it represents a significant advancement in the study of gender in Gothic literature. In works written in the gothic style by women, the oppression of women in patriarchal society is reflected, and the destruction of women at the hands of patriarchy is emphasized throughout gothic art; in this sense, the resilience of the female gothic protagonists in the face of adversity symbolizes their maturation as women. Based on this context, this research attempts to compare "The Bloody Chamber" by Angela Carter with "The Yellow Wallpaper" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman from the standpoint of the feminine Gothic fiction. The dark tragedies that await women in patriarchal culture are explored by Carter and Gilman in ways that transcend beyond the normal boundaries of the gothic genre. By contrasting the narratives, this study aims to show how women begin to question and even demolish patriarchal chauvinism and move away from their subservient position in patriarchal society.
性别、叙事流派与女性哥特式:安吉拉-卡特(Angela Carter)的《血腥房间》和夏洛特-帕金斯-吉尔曼(Charlotte Perkins Gilman)的《黄色壁纸》中对父权规范的反抗
女性哥特重新诠释了女性作家的作品,将女性主义与哥特文学研究融为一体。实际上,它代表了哥特文学中性别研究的一大进步。在女性创作的哥特式作品中,反映了父权制社会对女性的压迫,强调了女性在父权制下的毁灭贯穿于哥特式艺术的始终;从这个意义上说,哥特式女主人公在逆境中的坚韧象征着她们作为女性的成熟。基于这一背景,本研究试图从女性哥特小说的角度,对安吉拉-卡特的《血色密室》和夏洛特-帕金斯-吉尔曼的《黄壁纸》进行比较。卡特和吉尔曼以超越哥特体裁正常界限的方式,探讨了父权文化中等待女性的黑暗悲剧。通过对比这两部作品的叙事,本研究旨在展示女性如何开始质疑甚至摧毁父权沙文主义,并摆脱她们在父权社会中的从属地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信