Pemimpin Perempuan dalam Sejarah Yogyakarta Hadiningrat dan Relevansinya terhadap UUK DIY

Abdul Rohim Al Wafi, Yayan Rahtikawati, Nina Nurmila
{"title":"Pemimpin Perempuan dalam Sejarah Yogyakarta Hadiningrat dan Relevansinya terhadap UUK DIY","authors":"Abdul Rohim Al Wafi, Yayan Rahtikawati, Nina Nurmila","doi":"10.53038/tsyr.v2i2.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia is a democratic country with a unitary state system and uses a republic form. This has been stated in Indonesia's main constitution, namely the 1945 Constitution. As a consequence of using the above system, Indonesia has several regions under it which have their own autonomy. One of the autonomy that exists in Indonesia is the special status attached to the province of Yogyakarta. The privileges of Yogyakarta have long been legitimized by related laws, namely Law Number 2 of 1948. Apart from that, the privileges of Yogyakarta have also been strengthened by institutionalizing the form of the Sultanate and standardizing the highest regulations for the area; paugeran, into national regulations, namely Law No. 13 of 2012. So this research focuses on the extent to which paugeran is accommodated by Law no. 13 of 2012, specifically on the aspect of female leaders. This research is an analytic normative research using two theoretical approaches, namely stipulative theory and genealogical theory. It was found that Law no. 13 of 2012 was unable to fully accommodate the paugeran owned by the Sultanate of Yogyakarta. This is evidenced by the existence of several nomenclatures that are not in line with paugeran. In fact, paugeran is the spirit and spirit of the formation of Law no. 13 of 2012","PeriodicalId":153657,"journal":{"name":"Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53038/tsyr.v2i2.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia is a democratic country with a unitary state system and uses a republic form. This has been stated in Indonesia's main constitution, namely the 1945 Constitution. As a consequence of using the above system, Indonesia has several regions under it which have their own autonomy. One of the autonomy that exists in Indonesia is the special status attached to the province of Yogyakarta. The privileges of Yogyakarta have long been legitimized by related laws, namely Law Number 2 of 1948. Apart from that, the privileges of Yogyakarta have also been strengthened by institutionalizing the form of the Sultanate and standardizing the highest regulations for the area; paugeran, into national regulations, namely Law No. 13 of 2012. So this research focuses on the extent to which paugeran is accommodated by Law no. 13 of 2012, specifically on the aspect of female leaders. This research is an analytic normative research using two theoretical approaches, namely stipulative theory and genealogical theory. It was found that Law no. 13 of 2012 was unable to fully accommodate the paugeran owned by the Sultanate of Yogyakarta. This is evidenced by the existence of several nomenclatures that are not in line with paugeran. In fact, paugeran is the spirit and spirit of the formation of Law no. 13 of 2012
日惹哈迪宁拉特历史上的女性领导人及其与英国大学 DIY 的相关性
印度尼西亚是一个民主国家,实行单一制国家体制,采用共和制。印尼的主要宪法,即 1945 年《宪法》对此有明确规定。由于采用上述制度,印尼下辖多个地区,这些地区拥有各自的自治权。印尼现有的自治权之一是日惹省的特殊地位。日惹省的特权早已通过相关法律(即 1948 年第 2 号法律)合法化。除此之外,日惹省的特权还通过将苏丹国的形式制度化以及将该地区的最高法规(paugeran)标准化为国家法规(即 2012 年第 13 号法律)而得到加强。因此,本研究的重点是 2012 年第 13 号法律对 paugeran 的适应程度,特别是在女性领导人方面。本研究是一项分析性规范研究,采用了两种理论方法,即规定理论和谱系理论。研究发现,2012 年第 13 号法律无法完全包容日惹苏丹国所拥有的 paugeran。这体现在存在多个与 paugeran 不相符的名称。事实上,paugeran 是 2012 年第 13 号法律的精神实质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信