Comparison of ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing Models in Prediction of Stock Prices

Yogesh Funde, Akshay Damani
{"title":"Comparison of ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing Models in Prediction of Stock Prices","authors":"Yogesh Funde, Akshay Damani","doi":"10.5750/jpm.v17i1.2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stock prices tend to show trends or seasonality or have random walk movements. Time series statistical models developed over time aid prediction of stock prices to assist informed decision-making for investors. These models provide quantitative information to financial specialists at the time of placing their buy–sell orders. The paper compares the movement of two univariate time series using two forecasting models—exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) (p; d; q). We predict stock prices of selected 15 companies across three sectors (banking, pharmaceuticals, and Information technology) from NIFTY 50 data for the period April 01, 2016 to March 31, 2021. All these 15 companies are representative constituents of the three sectors within the Nifty 50 index. Performances of models were assessed through forecasting error measures such as root mean square error and mean absolute percentage error. Performances of both models were identical for nine stocks. Prediction based on ARIMA was more accurate for six stocks, whereas exponential smoothing model was a better indicator of stock prices in the case of one stock. However, the differences in error measures of the both the models are marginal, and parsimony principle may drive the choice of model.","PeriodicalId":352536,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prediction Markets","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prediction Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v17i1.2017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stock prices tend to show trends or seasonality or have random walk movements. Time series statistical models developed over time aid prediction of stock prices to assist informed decision-making for investors. These models provide quantitative information to financial specialists at the time of placing their buy–sell orders. The paper compares the movement of two univariate time series using two forecasting models—exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) (p; d; q). We predict stock prices of selected 15 companies across three sectors (banking, pharmaceuticals, and Information technology) from NIFTY 50 data for the period April 01, 2016 to March 31, 2021. All these 15 companies are representative constituents of the three sectors within the Nifty 50 index. Performances of models were assessed through forecasting error measures such as root mean square error and mean absolute percentage error. Performances of both models were identical for nine stocks. Prediction based on ARIMA was more accurate for six stocks, whereas exponential smoothing model was a better indicator of stock prices in the case of one stock. However, the differences in error measures of the both the models are marginal, and parsimony principle may drive the choice of model.
ARIMA 与指数平滑模型在股票价格预测中的比较
股票价格往往呈现趋势性、季节性或随机走势。长期以来开发的时间序列统计模型有助于预测股票价格,从而帮助投资者做出明智的决策。这些模型为金融专家在下达买卖指令时提供量化信息。本文使用两种预测模型--指数平滑法和自回归综合移动平均法(ARIMA)(p; d; q),对两个单变量时间序列的走势进行了比较。我们从 NIFTY 50 数据中选取了三个行业(银行、制药和信息技术)中 15 家公司的股票价格进行预测,时间跨度为 2016 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日。这 15 家公司都是 Nifty 50 指数中三个行业的代表性成分股。通过均方根误差和平均绝对百分比误差等预测误差指标来评估模型的性能。两种模型对 9 只股票的预测结果相同。对六只股票而言,基于 ARIMA 的预测更为准确,而指数平滑模型则能更好地反映一只股票的价格。然而,这两种模型的误差测量值差异很小,因此可能会根据简化原则来选择模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信