Comparison of the cardioprotective effects of St. Thomas and del Nido cardioplegia

M. Cayir
{"title":"Comparison of the cardioprotective effects of St. Thomas and del Nido cardioplegia","authors":"M. Cayir","doi":"10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to histopathologically examine the cardioprotective effects of St. Thomas and del Nido (DN) cardioplegia. Materials and methods: A total of 18 rabbits aged 23 weeks and weighing 2000 g were included in the experimental animal study. The animals were randomized to three groups, with six rabbits in each group. The first group was determined as the control group and no cardioprotective agent was given after ligation of the aorta. The rabbits in the second group received DN cardioplegia solution, and those in the third group received the St. Thomas cardioplegia solution. The groups were histopathologically graded and evaluated with six different scores. Results: There were statistically significant differences between St. Thomas, DN, and control groups with hematoxylin and eosin, caspase 3 and connexin 43 staining at 30, 60, and 90 min (p<0.05). However, the St. Thomas, DN, and control groups showed equal score 2- and score 3-weighted, score 3-weighted, and score 3-weighted distributions with connexin 43 at 90 min, respectively; there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.144). Conclusion: The most adverse tissue damage observed were localized hemorrhage and localized necrosis areas at the end of 90 min of cellular damage. Both cardioplegia applications significantly reduced tissue loss compared to the control group. However, we believe that DN cardioplegia has a longer application time and has better protection.","PeriodicalId":229686,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to histopathologically examine the cardioprotective effects of St. Thomas and del Nido (DN) cardioplegia. Materials and methods: A total of 18 rabbits aged 23 weeks and weighing 2000 g were included in the experimental animal study. The animals were randomized to three groups, with six rabbits in each group. The first group was determined as the control group and no cardioprotective agent was given after ligation of the aorta. The rabbits in the second group received DN cardioplegia solution, and those in the third group received the St. Thomas cardioplegia solution. The groups were histopathologically graded and evaluated with six different scores. Results: There were statistically significant differences between St. Thomas, DN, and control groups with hematoxylin and eosin, caspase 3 and connexin 43 staining at 30, 60, and 90 min (p<0.05). However, the St. Thomas, DN, and control groups showed equal score 2- and score 3-weighted, score 3-weighted, and score 3-weighted distributions with connexin 43 at 90 min, respectively; there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.144). Conclusion: The most adverse tissue damage observed were localized hemorrhage and localized necrosis areas at the end of 90 min of cellular damage. Both cardioplegia applications significantly reduced tissue loss compared to the control group. However, we believe that DN cardioplegia has a longer application time and has better protection.
圣托马斯和德尔尼多心脏麻痹对心脏保护作用的比较
研究目的本研究旨在从组织病理学角度研究圣托马斯和德尔尼都(DN)心脏麻痹对心脏的保护作用。材料和方法:共有 18 只年龄为 23 周、体重为 2000 克的兔子参与了动物实验研究。这些动物被随机分为三组,每组六只。第一组为对照组,结扎主动脉后不使用心脏保护剂。第二组兔子接受 DN 强心剂溶液,第三组兔子接受圣托马斯强心剂溶液。对各组进行组织病理学分级,并用六种不同的评分标准进行评估。结果:在 30 分钟、60 分钟和 90 分钟时,圣托马斯、DN 和对照组的苏木精和伊红、caspase 3 和 connexin 43 染色差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,在 90 分钟时,圣托马斯组、DN 组和对照组的 2 分和 3 分加权、3 分加权和 3 分加权的附件蛋白 43 分布分别相同;组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.144)。结论在细胞损伤 90 分钟结束时,观察到的最不利的组织损伤是局部出血和局部坏死区域。与对照组相比,两种心脏麻痹都能明显减少组织损失。不过,我们认为 DN 强心剂的应用时间更长,保护效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信