Comparison of Ca-Based Commercial and Natural Catalysts Performance on Olive Pomace Pyrolysis Process

Gamze Göktepeli̇, E. Yel
{"title":"Comparison of Ca-Based Commercial and Natural Catalysts Performance on Olive Pomace Pyrolysis Process","authors":"Gamze Göktepeli̇, E. Yel","doi":"10.21597/jist.1266636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physicochemical treatment was applied with 20 mg/L alum to the marble processing effluents as 5 minutes 200 rpm mixing, 25 minutes 15 rpm mixing and 60 minutes settling and marble sludge (MS) was produced. Catalytic performance of MS in olive pomace (OP) pyrolysis process was evaluated and compared to commercial Ca(OH)2 since it mainly comprises of different AAEMs (especially Ca and its forms such as CaCO3, CaO) functioned as catalyst. Catalytic pyrolysis was conducted at 600°C and 5°C/min heating rate with 5% and 10% catalyst (MS or Ca(OH)2) dosages. Although both catalysts had important effect on pyrolysis product yields, Ca(OH)2 was found as good alternative for higher gas production and MS was introduced as better option for the higher char production comparing to the conventional OP pyrolysis. Pyrolysis biochars produced with MS were in higher thermal strength than the biochars generated with Ca(OH)2. Moreover, biooils of OP+MS include different organic compounds, such as 9 heptadecanol, 1-eicosanol, ethyl linoleate, ethyl oleate, addition to the compounds observed in pyrolysis liquids of OP and OP+ Ca(OH)2. All detected organic components have diverse usage areas. Ca(OH)2 provided more decrement in the percentages of oxygenated compounds as compared to the MS. Consequently, it can be stated that MS can be used successfully as an alternative to Ca-based commercial catalyst in OP pyrolysis.","PeriodicalId":17353,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1266636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physicochemical treatment was applied with 20 mg/L alum to the marble processing effluents as 5 minutes 200 rpm mixing, 25 minutes 15 rpm mixing and 60 minutes settling and marble sludge (MS) was produced. Catalytic performance of MS in olive pomace (OP) pyrolysis process was evaluated and compared to commercial Ca(OH)2 since it mainly comprises of different AAEMs (especially Ca and its forms such as CaCO3, CaO) functioned as catalyst. Catalytic pyrolysis was conducted at 600°C and 5°C/min heating rate with 5% and 10% catalyst (MS or Ca(OH)2) dosages. Although both catalysts had important effect on pyrolysis product yields, Ca(OH)2 was found as good alternative for higher gas production and MS was introduced as better option for the higher char production comparing to the conventional OP pyrolysis. Pyrolysis biochars produced with MS were in higher thermal strength than the biochars generated with Ca(OH)2. Moreover, biooils of OP+MS include different organic compounds, such as 9 heptadecanol, 1-eicosanol, ethyl linoleate, ethyl oleate, addition to the compounds observed in pyrolysis liquids of OP and OP+ Ca(OH)2. All detected organic components have diverse usage areas. Ca(OH)2 provided more decrement in the percentages of oxygenated compounds as compared to the MS. Consequently, it can be stated that MS can be used successfully as an alternative to Ca-based commercial catalyst in OP pyrolysis.
钙基商用催化剂与天然催化剂在橄榄渣热解过程中的性能比较
对大理石加工废水采用 20 毫克/升明矾进行理化处理,搅拌 5 分钟,200 转/分;搅拌 25 分钟,15 转/分;沉淀 60 分钟,产生大理石污泥(MS)。由于大理石污泥主要由不同的 AAEMs(尤其是 Ca 及其形式,如 CaCO3、CaO)作为催化剂,因此对大理石污泥在橄榄渣(OP)热解过程中的催化性能进行了评估,并与商用 Ca(OH)2 进行了比较。催化热解在 600°C 和 5°C/min 升温速率下进行,催化剂(MS 或 Ca(OH)2)用量分别为 5%和 10%。虽然两种催化剂对热解产物产量都有重要影响,但与传统的 OP 热解相比,Ca(OH)2 是提高气体产量的良好选择,而 MS 则是提高焦炭产量的更好选择。与使用 Ca(OH)2 生成的生物炭相比,使用 MS 生成的热解生物炭的热强度更高。此外,除了在 OP 和 OP+ Ca(OH)2 的热解液中观察到的化合物外,OP+MS 的生物油还包括不同的有机化合物,如 9-十七醇、1-二十醇、亚油酸乙酯、油酸乙酯。所有检测到的有机成分都有不同的使用领域。与 MS 相比,Ca(OH)2 能更有效地降低含氧化合物的百分比。因此,在 OP 热解过程中,MS 可以成功地替代 Ca 基商业催化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信