Effects of ginger and ondansetron on intra and postoperative nausea and vomiting in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Behzad Imani, Sahar Alizade, S. Khazaei, Pouran Hajian
{"title":"Effects of ginger and ondansetron on intra and postoperative nausea and vomiting in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial","authors":"Behzad Imani, Sahar Alizade, S. Khazaei, Pouran Hajian","doi":"10.34172/jhp.2023.46050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The occurrence of nausea and vomiting following anesthesia and surgery is a prevalent and distressing issue, ranking second only to pain. In this study, the effects of ginger and ondansetron in mitigating these symptoms in patients who underwent cesarean section surgery were compared. Methods: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial included 150 eligible patients who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: ginger, ondansetron, and control. The ginger group was given one 1000 mg ginger capsule, the ondansetron group was given one 16 mg ondansetron capsule, and the control group was given one placebo capsule. Participants took their designated capsules with 30 mL of water one hour before their scheduled surgery. Nausea intensity and vomiting frequency were assessed throughout the surgical procedure and at post-operation intervals of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours. Results: Compared to the control group, the ginger group had significantly less severe nausea during the surgery (P=0.03) and one hour after surgery (P=0.01). The ginger group also had significantly fewer vomiting episodes during the surgery (P=0.007) and half an hour after surgery (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between the ginger and ondansetron groups regarding the severity of nausea and the number of vomiting (P>0.05). Conclusion: The administration of ginger was found to be successful in alleviating the severity of nausea and vomiting both during and after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section procedures. It could be a viable alternative to ondansetron.","PeriodicalId":15934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of HerbMed Pharmacology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of HerbMed Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jhp.2023.46050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The occurrence of nausea and vomiting following anesthesia and surgery is a prevalent and distressing issue, ranking second only to pain. In this study, the effects of ginger and ondansetron in mitigating these symptoms in patients who underwent cesarean section surgery were compared. Methods: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial included 150 eligible patients who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: ginger, ondansetron, and control. The ginger group was given one 1000 mg ginger capsule, the ondansetron group was given one 16 mg ondansetron capsule, and the control group was given one placebo capsule. Participants took their designated capsules with 30 mL of water one hour before their scheduled surgery. Nausea intensity and vomiting frequency were assessed throughout the surgical procedure and at post-operation intervals of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours. Results: Compared to the control group, the ginger group had significantly less severe nausea during the surgery (P=0.03) and one hour after surgery (P=0.01). The ginger group also had significantly fewer vomiting episodes during the surgery (P=0.007) and half an hour after surgery (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between the ginger and ondansetron groups regarding the severity of nausea and the number of vomiting (P>0.05). Conclusion: The administration of ginger was found to be successful in alleviating the severity of nausea and vomiting both during and after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section procedures. It could be a viable alternative to ondansetron.
生姜和昂丹司琼对脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术中和术后恶心呕吐的影响:双盲随机临床试验
导言:麻醉和手术后出现恶心和呕吐是一个普遍且令人痛苦的问题,其严重程度仅次于疼痛。本研究比较了生姜和昂丹司琼在减轻剖腹产手术患者恶心和呕吐症状方面的效果。研究方法这项双盲随机临床试验包括 150 名符合条件的患者,他们被随机分配到三组中的一组:生姜组、昂丹司琼组和对照组。生姜组服用一粒 1000 毫克的生姜胶囊,昂丹司琼组服用一粒 16 毫克的昂丹司琼胶囊,对照组服用一粒安慰剂胶囊。参试者在预定手术前一小时用 30 毫升水服用指定胶囊。在整个手术过程中以及手术后 0.5、1、2 和 4 小时的间隔时间内对恶心强度和呕吐频率进行评估。结果显示与对照组相比,生姜组在手术中(P=0.03)和手术后一小时(P=0.01)的恶心程度明显减轻。生姜组在手术中(P=0.007)和手术后半小时(P=0.001)的呕吐次数也明显减少。生姜组和昂丹司琼组在恶心严重程度和呕吐次数方面没有明显差异(P>0.05)。结论在剖腹产手术脊髓麻醉期间和之后服用生姜可成功缓解恶心和呕吐的严重程度。生姜可以替代昂丹司琼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of HerbMed Pharmacology
Journal of HerbMed Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Drug Discovery
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Herbmed Pharmacology (J Herbmed Pharmacol) is the intersection between medicinal plants and pharmacology. This international journal publishes manuscripts in the fields of medicinal plants, pharmacology and therapeutic. This journal aims to reach all relevant national and international medical institutions and persons in electronic version free of charge. J Herbmed Pharmacol has pursued this aim through publishing editorials, original research articles, reviews, mini-reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, hypothesis, case reports, epidemiology and prevention, news and views. In this journal, particular emphasis is given to research, both experimental and clinical, aimed at protection/prevention of diseases. A further aim of this journal is to emphasize and strengthen the link between herbalists and pharmacologists. In addition, J Herbmed Pharmacol welcomes basic biomedical as well as pharmaceutical scientific research applied to clinical pharmacology. Contributions in any of these formats are invited for editorial consideration following peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信