AI WRITING CORRECTION TOOLS: TEACHERS AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Mulyono Putra
{"title":"AI WRITING CORRECTION TOOLS: TEACHERS AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION","authors":"Mulyono Putra","doi":"10.20414/jtq.v21i1.7963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the similarities and differences of perceptions of teachers and students, examines the issue of academic integrity, and explores the potential for incorporating AI writing correction tools into language teaching and learning. Eighteen lecturers and thirty-nine graduate students were asked to respond to a closed- and open-ended questionnaire to answer the research questions. The sample was collected from the TESOL program at St. Andrews University's International Education Institute. The questionnaire was analysed using Qualtrix to see the patterns from the Likert scale, and thematic analysis was utilized to anticipate the identified themes from the open-ended questionnaire. The findings show that teachers and students have various opinions about using AI writing correction tools in a classroom setting, with some similarities and differences. Interestingly, the majority of teachers and students did not regard the use of AI writing correction tools as a violation of academic integrity. Furthermore, there was a conflicting view among teachers about integrating AI writing correction tools in the classroom. Meanwhile, most students agreed that AI writing could be integrated into teaching and learning.","PeriodicalId":32844,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tatsqif","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tatsqif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v21i1.7963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the similarities and differences of perceptions of teachers and students, examines the issue of academic integrity, and explores the potential for incorporating AI writing correction tools into language teaching and learning. Eighteen lecturers and thirty-nine graduate students were asked to respond to a closed- and open-ended questionnaire to answer the research questions. The sample was collected from the TESOL program at St. Andrews University's International Education Institute. The questionnaire was analysed using Qualtrix to see the patterns from the Likert scale, and thematic analysis was utilized to anticipate the identified themes from the open-ended questionnaire. The findings show that teachers and students have various opinions about using AI writing correction tools in a classroom setting, with some similarities and differences. Interestingly, the majority of teachers and students did not regard the use of AI writing correction tools as a violation of academic integrity. Furthermore, there was a conflicting view among teachers about integrating AI writing correction tools in the classroom. Meanwhile, most students agreed that AI writing could be integrated into teaching and learning.
AI写作批改工具:教师和学生的看法
本研究调查了教师和学生看法的异同,探讨了学术诚信问题,并探索了将人工智能写作批改工具纳入语言教学的潜力。为回答研究问题,18 名讲师和 39 名研究生被要求回答封闭式和开放式问卷。样本来自圣安德鲁斯大学国际教育学院的 TESOL 课程。我们使用 Qualtrix 对问卷进行了分析,以了解李克特量表的模式,并利用主题分析来预测开放式问卷中确定的主题。研究结果表明,教师和学生对在课堂环境中使用人工智能写作批改工具有不同的看法,其中既有相似之处,也有不同之处。有趣的是,大多数教师和学生并不认为使用人工智能写作批改工具违反了学术诚信。此外,教师对将人工智能写作批改工具融入课堂的看法存在冲突。与此同时,大多数学生同意将人工智能写作融入教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信