Comparison of Michaelis Rhombus, Height and Foot Length of Patient in Prediction of Mode of Delivery

Deepika Jain, Priyanka Bramhwanshi, Pulak K. Roy, Kalpana Mahadik
{"title":"Comparison of Michaelis Rhombus, Height and Foot Length of Patient in Prediction of Mode of Delivery","authors":"Deepika Jain, Priyanka Bramhwanshi, Pulak K. Roy, Kalpana Mahadik","doi":"10.58999/cijmr.v2i02.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Michaelis rhombus, a diamond-shaped area in the lower back is easy to measure. During labor it is thought to move posteriorly, pushing out the wings of the ileum and increasing the diameter of the pelvis. Comparison of Michaelis Rhombus, height and foot length of patient in has been used as a simple means to identify women at risk of cephalo-pelvic disproportion and help in prediction of a safe mode of delivery. Aim and Objective: The present study was conducted to evaluate the Michaelis rhombus as predictor of contracted pelvis and to compare its efficacy to other measures like maternal height and foot length of labouring and or antenatal mothers.  Method: This is a Prospective Observational comparative study conducted on 220 antenatal pregnant women who were admitted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R. D. Gardi Medical college and C.R.G. Hospital, Surasa, Ujjain (M.P.), India. This study was carried out on pregnant women in the age group of 19-35 years, which were coming for delivery in our hospital with gestational age >36 weeks. Result: Out of 220 subjects 190 delivered by normal delivery and 30 subjects by LSCS. Transverse diagonal was significantly lower in LSCS mean 9.53±0.69 cm as compared to normal delivery where transverse diagonal [mean 10.59±0.55 cm] (p = 0.000). Vertical diagonal was lower in LSCS cases (mean 10.73±0.87 cm) as compare to normal delivery where vertical diagonal (mean 11.94±0.73 cm). Foot length was significantly lower in LSCS cases with mean 23.12±1.28 cm as compared to normal delivery with mean 24.48±1.05 cm. Height was significantly lower in LSCS cases with mean 148.23±5.56 cm as compared to normal delivery with mean 153.94±3.31 cm. Conclusion: Anthropometric parameters like Michaelis rhombus, height, foot length can be used as predictor of contracted pelvis. These measurements help to increase ease of patient for clinical assessment of pelvis by decreasing multiple per vaginal examination, thereby decreasing chances of infection.","PeriodicalId":127536,"journal":{"name":"Central India Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central India Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58999/cijmr.v2i02.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Michaelis rhombus, a diamond-shaped area in the lower back is easy to measure. During labor it is thought to move posteriorly, pushing out the wings of the ileum and increasing the diameter of the pelvis. Comparison of Michaelis Rhombus, height and foot length of patient in has been used as a simple means to identify women at risk of cephalo-pelvic disproportion and help in prediction of a safe mode of delivery. Aim and Objective: The present study was conducted to evaluate the Michaelis rhombus as predictor of contracted pelvis and to compare its efficacy to other measures like maternal height and foot length of labouring and or antenatal mothers.  Method: This is a Prospective Observational comparative study conducted on 220 antenatal pregnant women who were admitted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R. D. Gardi Medical college and C.R.G. Hospital, Surasa, Ujjain (M.P.), India. This study was carried out on pregnant women in the age group of 19-35 years, which were coming for delivery in our hospital with gestational age >36 weeks. Result: Out of 220 subjects 190 delivered by normal delivery and 30 subjects by LSCS. Transverse diagonal was significantly lower in LSCS mean 9.53±0.69 cm as compared to normal delivery where transverse diagonal [mean 10.59±0.55 cm] (p = 0.000). Vertical diagonal was lower in LSCS cases (mean 10.73±0.87 cm) as compare to normal delivery where vertical diagonal (mean 11.94±0.73 cm). Foot length was significantly lower in LSCS cases with mean 23.12±1.28 cm as compared to normal delivery with mean 24.48±1.05 cm. Height was significantly lower in LSCS cases with mean 148.23±5.56 cm as compared to normal delivery with mean 153.94±3.31 cm. Conclusion: Anthropometric parameters like Michaelis rhombus, height, foot length can be used as predictor of contracted pelvis. These measurements help to increase ease of patient for clinical assessment of pelvis by decreasing multiple per vaginal examination, thereby decreasing chances of infection.
米凯利斯菱形、身高和脚长在预测分娩方式中的比较
背景:米凯利斯菱形是腰部的一个菱形区域,很容易测量。在分娩过程中,它被认为会向后方移动,将回肠的两翼挤出并增加骨盆的直径。比较患者的米凯利斯菱形、身高和脚长已被用作一种简单的方法来识别有头盆不称风险的产妇,并帮助预测安全的分娩方式。目的和目标:本研究旨在评估米凯利斯菱形作为骨盆收缩预测指标的效果,并将其与产妇身高和足长等其他测量指标进行比较。 研究方法这是一项前瞻性观察比较研究,对象是印度乌贾因(M.P.)苏拉萨 R. D. Gardi 医学院和 C.R.G. 医院妇产科收治的 220 名产前孕妇。这项研究的对象是 19-35 岁年龄组的孕妇,她们都是来本医院分娩的,孕周大于 36 周。结果在 220 名受试者中,190 人顺产,30 人 LSCS。与顺产的横对角线[平均为 10.59±0.55 厘米]相比,LSCS 的横对角线明显较低,平均为 9.53±0.69 厘米(P = 0.000)。与顺产的垂直对角线(平均为 11.94±0.73 厘米)相比,LSCS 病例的垂直对角线较低(平均为 10.73±0.87 厘米)。LSCS 病例的足长(平均值为 23.12±1.28 厘米)明显低于正常分娩的足长(平均值为 24.48±1.05 厘米)。LSCS 患儿的身高(平均值为 148.23±5.56 厘米)明显低于顺产(平均值为 153.94±3.31 厘米)。结论Michaelis菱形、身高、足长等人体测量参数可用于预测骨盆收缩。这些测量有助于减少每次阴道检查的次数,从而降低感染的几率,使患者更容易对骨盆进行临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信