Legality of Marine Cargo Insurance Claim With Different Sailing Date on Policy (Analysis of Decisions Number 589/PDT.G/2012/PN.JKT.SEL)

Yuridika Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.20473/ydk.v38i3.47966
Krisna Angela, Dian Purnama Anugerah, Universitas Airlangga, Dian Purnama
{"title":"Legality of Marine Cargo Insurance Claim With Different Sailing Date on Policy (Analysis of Decisions Number 589/PDT.G/2012/PN.JKT.SEL)","authors":"Krisna Angela, Dian Purnama Anugerah, Universitas Airlangga, Dian Purnama","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i3.47966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sailing dates in marine cargo insurance often change for various reasons. It is unavoidable that from the time the ship sail on a date that is not under the policy, uncertain events occur, which cause losses. On the other hand, insurance recognizes the principle of utmost good faith, which obliges the insured to disclose material facts about the insured object correctly, completely, and honestly as regulated in Article 251 WvK. It creates a blurring of norms because that rule make the parties debating whether the ship's sailing date is a material fact or not. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. This research purposed to analyze changes in sailing date as material facts and the consequences of not disclosing these changes by the insured to the insurer and the insurer to the reinsurer by analyzing Decision Number 589/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. The results of this study indicate that the change in sailing date is a material fact that must be disclosed by the insured to the insurer. When the insured does not disclose material facts, it can make a contract voidable and the insurer can be free from the obligation to pay claims. In addition, the Judge's decision in Decision Number 589/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel was wrong because the Judge did not analyze the meaning and concept of material facts in marine cargo insurance as regulated in Article 251 WvK and did not consider the provisions in the policy referring to the Marine Insurance Act 1906.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i3.47966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sailing dates in marine cargo insurance often change for various reasons. It is unavoidable that from the time the ship sail on a date that is not under the policy, uncertain events occur, which cause losses. On the other hand, insurance recognizes the principle of utmost good faith, which obliges the insured to disclose material facts about the insured object correctly, completely, and honestly as regulated in Article 251 WvK. It creates a blurring of norms because that rule make the parties debating whether the ship's sailing date is a material fact or not. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. This research purposed to analyze changes in sailing date as material facts and the consequences of not disclosing these changes by the insured to the insurer and the insurer to the reinsurer by analyzing Decision Number 589/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. The results of this study indicate that the change in sailing date is a material fact that must be disclosed by the insured to the insurer. When the insured does not disclose material facts, it can make a contract voidable and the insurer can be free from the obligation to pay claims. In addition, the Judge's decision in Decision Number 589/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel was wrong because the Judge did not analyze the meaning and concept of material facts in marine cargo insurance as regulated in Article 251 WvK and did not consider the provisions in the policy referring to the Marine Insurance Act 1906.
保单上航行日期不同的海运货物保险索赔的合法性(第 589/PDT.G/2012/PN.JKT.SEL 号裁决分析)
海运货物保险的开航日期经常会因为各种原因而改变。从船舶在非保单规定的日期起航时,不可避免地会发生不确定事件,从而造成损失。另一方面,保险承认最大诚信原则,即被保险人有义务按照 WvK 第 251 条的规定,正确、完整、诚实地披露有关被保险标的的重要事实。这就造成了规范的模糊,因为该规则使得双方当事人对船舶的航行日期是否属于重要事实争论不休。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,包括法规方法、概念方法和案例方法。本研究旨在通过分析第 589/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel 号判决,分析作为重要事实的航行日期的变化以及被保险人向保险人和保险人向再保险人不披露这些变化的后果。研究结果表明,开航日期的变更是被保险人必须向保险人披露的重要事实。如果被保险人不披露重要事实,就会导致合同无效,保险人也就可以免除赔付义务。此外,法官在第 589/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel 号判决中的裁决是错误的,因为法官没有分析 WvK 第 251 条规定的海上货物保险中重要事实的含义和概念,也没有考虑保单中提及《1906 年海上保险法》的条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信