Victorian science and morality in Robert Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886)

Flavia Renata Machado Paiani
{"title":"Victorian science and morality in Robert Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886)","authors":"Flavia Renata Machado Paiani","doi":"10.1590/2596-304x20232550frmp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyzes how Scottish writer Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894) depicts the relationship between science and morality (secular or religious) in his 1886 novella The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. For this purpose, I analyze the setting choice (London) and some characteristics of late Victorian Gothic fiction that constitute the negative aesthetics of which Stevenson’s characters are formed. Then, I analyze how the negative aesthetic juxtaposes with an order that is both scientific and moralist in a cultural context in which the reading public is obsessed with crime. Eventually, I discuss the theories of 19th-century philosophers and scientists, such as Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909), and Francis Galton (1822-1911), in an attempt to understand Stevenson’s novella from an allegedly scientific point of view. I conclude that Hyde/Jekyll was “destined” to fail since both late Victorian science and morality were prone to condemn the “unfit”.","PeriodicalId":33855,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Literatura Comparada","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Literatura Comparada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2596-304x20232550frmp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyzes how Scottish writer Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894) depicts the relationship between science and morality (secular or religious) in his 1886 novella The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. For this purpose, I analyze the setting choice (London) and some characteristics of late Victorian Gothic fiction that constitute the negative aesthetics of which Stevenson’s characters are formed. Then, I analyze how the negative aesthetic juxtaposes with an order that is both scientific and moralist in a cultural context in which the reading public is obsessed with crime. Eventually, I discuss the theories of 19th-century philosophers and scientists, such as Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909), and Francis Galton (1822-1911), in an attempt to understand Stevenson’s novella from an allegedly scientific point of view. I conclude that Hyde/Jekyll was “destined” to fail since both late Victorian science and morality were prone to condemn the “unfit”.
罗伯特-路易斯-史蒂文森的《杰基尔博士和海德先生的奇遇》(1886 年)中的维多利亚时代科学与道德
ABSTRACT 本文分析了苏格兰作家罗伯特-路易斯-史蒂文森(1850-1894 年)在其 1886 年长篇小说《杰基尔博士和海德先生的奇事》中如何描绘科学与道德(世俗或宗教)之间的关系。为此,我分析了背景选择(伦敦)和维多利亚晚期哥特小说的一些特点,这些特点构成了史蒂文森笔下人物的消极美学。然后,我分析了在读者沉迷于犯罪的文化背景下,消极美学是如何与一种既科学又道德的秩序并存的。最后,我讨论了 19 世纪哲学家和科学家的理论,如赫伯特-斯宾塞(Herbert Spencer,1820-1903 年)、切萨雷-龙勃罗梭(Cesare Lombroso,1835-1909 年)和弗朗西斯-高尔顿(Francis Galton,1822-1911 年),试图从所谓的科学角度来理解史蒂文森的长篇小说。我的结论是,《海德/杰基尔》"注定 "要失败,因为维多利亚时代晚期的科学和道德都倾向于谴责 "不合适的人"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信