Workshop (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1972517

IF 2.4 Q1 REHABILITATION
John Chernesky, Anita Kaiser, Barry Munro, K. Walden, Heather Gainforth, Kristin E. Musselman
{"title":"Workshop (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1972517","authors":"John Chernesky, Anita Kaiser, Barry Munro, K. Walden, Heather Gainforth, Kristin E. Musselman","doi":"10.46292/sci23-1972517s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teams with diverse perspectives and experiences have been increasingly recognized for their ability to identify key issues and utilize creativity and problem solving to plan and implement research and clinical initiatives that lead to greater impact. Yet, often we are unsure how to best engage individuals with differing expertise, such as those with lived experience, clinicians, healthcare administrators, engineers, researchers, funders and policy experts. After completing this workshop, participants will be able to: 1) Understand the principles and value of meaningfully engaging with a diverse team when conducting research or clinical projects, 2) Identify strategies that can facilitate the meaningful engagement of individuals with differing expertise, and 3) Create a plan of engagement for a research study or clinical initiative. A combination of lecture-based and case-based learning will be used to explain the guiding principles and best-practices for meaningful engagement and to discuss relevant resources, such as the North American Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Consortium’s SCI Resource Advocacy Course and the Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles. Participants will be asked to apply these principles and practices to one of their own research or clinical initiatives through small group discussion. The Canadian Activity-Based Therapy (ABT) Community of Practice, which brings together diverse groups to address priorities for ABT research and clinical care, will be used as a case example during large group discussion. Not applicable. Through this workshop, participants will gain knowledge and strategies that can be applied to facilitate meaningful engagement in research and clinical initiatives.","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-1972517s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teams with diverse perspectives and experiences have been increasingly recognized for their ability to identify key issues and utilize creativity and problem solving to plan and implement research and clinical initiatives that lead to greater impact. Yet, often we are unsure how to best engage individuals with differing expertise, such as those with lived experience, clinicians, healthcare administrators, engineers, researchers, funders and policy experts. After completing this workshop, participants will be able to: 1) Understand the principles and value of meaningfully engaging with a diverse team when conducting research or clinical projects, 2) Identify strategies that can facilitate the meaningful engagement of individuals with differing expertise, and 3) Create a plan of engagement for a research study or clinical initiative. A combination of lecture-based and case-based learning will be used to explain the guiding principles and best-practices for meaningful engagement and to discuss relevant resources, such as the North American Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Consortium’s SCI Resource Advocacy Course and the Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles. Participants will be asked to apply these principles and practices to one of their own research or clinical initiatives through small group discussion. The Canadian Activity-Based Therapy (ABT) Community of Practice, which brings together diverse groups to address priorities for ABT research and clinical care, will be used as a case example during large group discussion. Not applicable. Through this workshop, participants will gain knowledge and strategies that can be applied to facilitate meaningful engagement in research and clinical initiatives.
讲习班(临床/最佳实践实施) ID 1972517
具有不同观点和经验的团队能够发现关键问题,并利用创造力和解决问题的能力来规划和实施研究与临床计划,从而产生更大的影响,这一点已日益得到认可。然而,我们往往不知道如何才能最好地让具有不同专业知识的个人参与进来,例如有生活经验的人、临床医生、医疗保健管理人员、工程师、研究人员、资助者和政策专家。完成本讲座后,学员将能够1) 了解在开展研究或临床项目时与多元化团队进行有意义合作的原则和价值;2) 确定可促进具有不同专长的个人进行有意义合作的策略;以及 3) 为研究或临床项目制定合作计划。 我们将采用讲授式学习和案例式学习相结合的方式,解释有意义参与的指导原则和最佳实践,并讨论相关资源,如北美脊髓损伤(SCI)联盟的 SCI 资源宣传课程和综合知识转化指导原则。与会者将被要求通过小组讨论将这些原则和实践应用到自己的一项研究或临床计划中。加拿大活动疗法(ABT)实践社区将在大组讨论中作为一个案例,该社区汇集了不同的团体,以解决活动疗法研究和临床护理的优先事项。 不适用。 通过本研讨会,与会者将获得可用于促进有意义地参与研究和临床活动的知识和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信