Assessment of environmental safety and energy security for the development options of heat supply to a settlement in the Arctic

N.V. Pavlov, V.E. Zakharov, D.V. Prokhorov, A. Ivanova, T. Petrova, S.S. Vasiliev, I. Y. Ivanova, E. Maysyuk
{"title":"Assessment of environmental safety and energy security for the development options of heat supply to a settlement in the Arctic","authors":"N.V. Pavlov, V.E. Zakharov, D.V. Prokhorov, A. Ivanova, T. Petrova, S.S. Vasiliev, I. Y. Ivanova, E. Maysyuk","doi":"10.25283/2223-4594-2023-3-417-427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of comparing the environmental performance of district and individual heating options on the example of a settlement located in the Arctic territory of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). The thermal energy source for the district option is a coal-fired boiler house; the one for the individual option is automated pellet boilers. The boiler house receives coal according to a complex multi-link scheme, whereas pellets are produced on site. The district heating option involves laying heat networks throughout the village because currently it has none. The individual heating option suggests the construction of a pellet production plant. Environmental indicators are calculated emissions of pollutants and carbon dioxide emissions from fuel combustion. Pollutants include solids, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide. Along with environmental indicators, the authors consider the conditions for ensuring energy security in various heating options. The research findings show the advantage of the individual heating option based on automated pellet boilers for environmental indicators. The risks for this option are assessed from the standpoint of threats to the energy security of the settlement in comparison with the district heating option. The factors considered as threats include those affecting the reliability and survivability of process technologies, an increase in the thermal energy cost, and the availability of fuel and energy resources. The main limitation for the option of individual heating in the Arctic territories, which is based on locally produced wood pellets, is the lack of reasonable reserves of available wood in wood-cutting areas near the settlement.","PeriodicalId":502389,"journal":{"name":"Arctic: Ecology and Economy","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic: Ecology and Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-2023-3-417-427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of comparing the environmental performance of district and individual heating options on the example of a settlement located in the Arctic territory of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). The thermal energy source for the district option is a coal-fired boiler house; the one for the individual option is automated pellet boilers. The boiler house receives coal according to a complex multi-link scheme, whereas pellets are produced on site. The district heating option involves laying heat networks throughout the village because currently it has none. The individual heating option suggests the construction of a pellet production plant. Environmental indicators are calculated emissions of pollutants and carbon dioxide emissions from fuel combustion. Pollutants include solids, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide. Along with environmental indicators, the authors consider the conditions for ensuring energy security in various heating options. The research findings show the advantage of the individual heating option based on automated pellet boilers for environmental indicators. The risks for this option are assessed from the standpoint of threats to the energy security of the settlement in comparison with the district heating option. The factors considered as threats include those affecting the reliability and survivability of process technologies, an increase in the thermal energy cost, and the availability of fuel and energy resources. The main limitation for the option of individual heating in the Arctic territories, which is based on locally produced wood pellets, is the lack of reasonable reserves of available wood in wood-cutting areas near the settlement.
北极地区居民点供热开发方案的环境安全和能源安全评估
文章以位于萨哈共和国(雅库特)北极地区的一个定居点为例,介绍了区域供暖方案和单独供暖方案的环境性能比较结果。区域供热方案的热能来源是燃煤锅炉房,个人供热方案的热能来源是自动颗粒锅炉。锅炉房根据复杂的多链路方案接收煤炭,而颗粒燃料则在现场生产。区域供热方案涉及在全村铺设供热网络,因为目前全村还没有供热网络。单独供暖方案建议建造一个颗粒燃料生产厂。环境指标是计算燃料燃烧产生的污染物排放量和二氧化碳排放量。污染物包括固体、二氧化硫、氮氧化物和一氧化碳。除环境指标外,作者还考虑了在各种供热方案中确保能源安全的条件。研究结果表明,基于自动颗粒锅炉的单独供暖方案在环境指标方面具有优势。与区域供热方案相比,从对住区能源安全的威胁角度对该方案的风险进行了评估。被视为威胁的因素包括影响工艺技术的可靠性和生存能力的因素、热能成本的增加以及燃料和能源资源的可用性。北极地区的单独供暖方案以当地生产的木质颗粒为基础,其主要限制因素是定居点附近的伐木区缺乏合理的可用木材储备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信