Detecting Careless Cases in Practice Tests

Steven Nydick
{"title":"Detecting Careless Cases in Practice Tests","authors":"Steven Nydick","doi":"10.59863/lavm1367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a novel method for detecting careless responses in a low-stakes practice exam using machine learning models. Rather than classifying test-taker responses as careless based on model fit statistics or knowledge of truth, we built a model to predict significant changes in test scores between a practice test and an official test based on attributes of practice test items. We extracted features from practice test items using hypotheses about how careless test takers respond to items and cross-validated model performance to optimize out-of-sample predictions and reduce heteroscedasticity when predicting the closest official test. All analyses use data from the practice and official versions of the Duolingo English Test. We discuss the implications of using a machine learning model for predicting careless cases as compared with alternative, popular methods.","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59863/lavm1367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel method for detecting careless responses in a low-stakes practice exam using machine learning models. Rather than classifying test-taker responses as careless based on model fit statistics or knowledge of truth, we built a model to predict significant changes in test scores between a practice test and an official test based on attributes of practice test items. We extracted features from practice test items using hypotheses about how careless test takers respond to items and cross-validated model performance to optimize out-of-sample predictions and reduce heteroscedasticity when predicting the closest official test. All analyses use data from the practice and official versions of the Duolingo English Test. We discuss the implications of using a machine learning model for predicting careless cases as compared with alternative, popular methods.
检测练习测试中的粗心案例
在本文中,我们提出了一种利用机器学习模型检测低风险练习考试中粗心作答的新方法。我们不是根据模型拟合统计或真理知识将应试者的回答归类为粗心,而是建立了一个模型,根据练习考试项目的属性预测练习考试和正式考试之间考试成绩的显著变化。我们利用有关粗心考生如何应对题目的假设,从练习测试题目中提取特征,并交叉验证模型性能,以优化样本外预测,并在预测最接近的正式测试时减少异方差。所有分析都使用了来自练习版和官方版 Duolingo 英语测试的数据。与其他流行方法相比,我们讨论了使用机器学习模型预测粗心情况的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信