A commentary on ‘The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer. A cross sectional study’ – a correspondence
{"title":"A commentary on ‘The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer. A cross sectional study’ – a correspondence","authors":"Xue-Lei Li, Zhi-Peng Liu, Hai-Su Dai, Xian-Yu Yin, Zhi-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000000680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With great interest, we read the article by Su et al . [1] . This article is a single-center cross-sectional study involving an analysis of the prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgical treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The authors collected clinical data of patients with stage I and stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received treatment from a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2020, and a total of 159 patients were eligible after exclusion, including 46 patients (29%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and 113 patients (71%) in the upfront resection (UR) group. They found that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival. This is a great fi nding; however, after carefully reading the article, we would like to raise the following questions regarding some details","PeriodicalId":297147,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","volume":"87 1","pages":"4347 - 4348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With great interest, we read the article by Su et al . [1] . This article is a single-center cross-sectional study involving an analysis of the prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgical treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The authors collected clinical data of patients with stage I and stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received treatment from a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2020, and a total of 159 patients were eligible after exclusion, including 46 patients (29%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and 113 patients (71%) in the upfront resection (UR) group. They found that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival. This is a great fi nding; however, after carefully reading the article, we would like to raise the following questions regarding some details
我们怀着极大的兴趣阅读了 Su 等人的文章 [1] 。这篇文章是一项单中心横断面研究,涉及可切除胰腺导管腺癌新辅助化疗与前期手术治疗的预后分析。作者收集了2013年至2020年期间在一家三甲医院接受治疗的I期和II期胰腺导管腺癌患者的临床数据,经排除后共有159名患者符合条件,其中新辅助化疗(NAC)组有46名患者(29%),前期切除(UR)组有113名患者(71%)。他们发现,在可切除的胰腺癌患者中,NAC优于UR,生存率更高。这是一个很好的发现;但是,在仔细阅读了这篇文章后,我们想就一些细节提出以下问题