Ethical research principles: Documenting Latin American faculty perspectives through Q-sort

Clarena Larrotta, Elizabeth Meneses
{"title":"Ethical research principles: Documenting Latin American faculty perspectives through Q-sort","authors":"Clarena Larrotta, Elizabeth Meneses","doi":"10.52134/ueader.1313694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ethical principles in research are universal and serve as a humanizing guide throughout the research process. Their application requires keeping in mind the local health, socio-cultural, and economic conditions where research is conducted. Higher education institutions and researchers share the responsibility of ensuring application of ethical research principles in science, technology, and innovation activities. This article reports findings from a mixed methods study on the perspectives of university faculty regarding the application of research ethical principles to research endeavors. Utilizing a Q-method approach to capturing subjectivity, 52 faculty-researchers participated in an online Q-sort exercise which also included an open-ended questionnaire. The study looked at similarities and differences in viewpoints regarding the application of ethical research principles. The study research questions included: (1) what are the participants’ perspectives applying research ethical principles? (2) what are the similarities and differences in viewpoints when looking at the participants’ years of research experience, research ethics preparation, and field of expertise? This article presents the results analyzing the responses of the participating faculty researchers. Similarities and differences of their perspectives were documented by looking at years of research experience, research ethics background, and field of expertise. Study findings point to the need to offer more opportunities for training to better prepare experienced and less experienced researchers on how to anticipate and plan for ethical dilemmas that may arise while conducting research. Emerging and experienced researchers can benefit from such training and self-awareness. Keywords: Q-sort, Ethical Research, Ethical Dilemmas, Scientific Research, Faculty Perspectives.","PeriodicalId":117272,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmacıları Dergisi","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmacıları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1313694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ethical principles in research are universal and serve as a humanizing guide throughout the research process. Their application requires keeping in mind the local health, socio-cultural, and economic conditions where research is conducted. Higher education institutions and researchers share the responsibility of ensuring application of ethical research principles in science, technology, and innovation activities. This article reports findings from a mixed methods study on the perspectives of university faculty regarding the application of research ethical principles to research endeavors. Utilizing a Q-method approach to capturing subjectivity, 52 faculty-researchers participated in an online Q-sort exercise which also included an open-ended questionnaire. The study looked at similarities and differences in viewpoints regarding the application of ethical research principles. The study research questions included: (1) what are the participants’ perspectives applying research ethical principles? (2) what are the similarities and differences in viewpoints when looking at the participants’ years of research experience, research ethics preparation, and field of expertise? This article presents the results analyzing the responses of the participating faculty researchers. Similarities and differences of their perspectives were documented by looking at years of research experience, research ethics background, and field of expertise. Study findings point to the need to offer more opportunities for training to better prepare experienced and less experienced researchers on how to anticipate and plan for ethical dilemmas that may arise while conducting research. Emerging and experienced researchers can benefit from such training and self-awareness. Keywords: Q-sort, Ethical Research, Ethical Dilemmas, Scientific Research, Faculty Perspectives.
伦理研究原则:通过 Q 排序记录拉美教师的观点
研究伦理原则具有普遍性,是整个研究过程中的人性化指南。要应用这些原则,就必须牢记开展研究的当地卫生、社会文化和经济条件。高等教育机构和研究人员都有责任确保在科学、技术和创新活动中贯彻研究伦理原则。本文报告了一项混合方法研究的结果,该研究从大学教师的角度探讨了研究伦理原则在研究工作中的应用。利用 Q 方法捕捉主观性,52 位教研人员参与了在线 Q 排序练习,其中还包括一份开放式问卷。该研究探讨了在应用研究伦理原则方面观点的异同。研究的问题包括(1) 参与者如何看待研究伦理原则的应用?(2) 从参与者的研究年限、研究伦理准备和专业领域来看,他们的观点有何异同?本文介绍了对参与研究的教研人员的回答进行分析的结果。通过研究年限、研究伦理背景和专业领域,记录了他们观点的异同。研究结果表明,有必要提供更多的培训机会,让经验丰富和经验不足的研究人员更好地了解如何预测和计划研究过程中可能出现的伦理困境。新晋研究人员和经验丰富的研究人员都能从此类培训和自我意识中受益。 关键词Q-sort、伦理研究、伦理困境、科学研究、教师观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信