A commentary on ‘Effectiveness of local anesthetic application methods in postoperative pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomies; a randomised controlled trial’

Zhichao Chen, Jianfeng Wei
{"title":"A commentary on ‘Effectiveness of local anesthetic application methods in postoperative pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomies; a randomised controlled trial’","authors":"Zhichao Chen, Jianfeng Wei","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000000744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was with great interest that we read the article published in the International Journal of Surgery in 2022. The authors observed the effectiveness of local anesthetic injection (LAI), abdominal local anesthesia injection (IPLA), and transabdominal plane block (TAPB), and no local anesthetic controls on post-operative pain, and compared the analgesic ef fi cacy of these methods [1] . The results showed that intraoperative local anesthesia can effectively control postoperative pain, especially TAPB can better manage postoperative pain. Many aspects of this study are well done. The authors conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled study. They had 160 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis and used statistical analysis to rule out confounding factors that might in fl uence postoperative pain, such as age, gender, previous operations, body mass index and number of trocars. In addition, they openly discussed the limitations of their study. All of these are advantages of research design. We can learn from their examples. However, we believe that there are several important questions in this study that are not well addressed. The authors","PeriodicalId":297147,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","volume":"137 1","pages":"4385 - 4386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It was with great interest that we read the article published in the International Journal of Surgery in 2022. The authors observed the effectiveness of local anesthetic injection (LAI), abdominal local anesthesia injection (IPLA), and transabdominal plane block (TAPB), and no local anesthetic controls on post-operative pain, and compared the analgesic ef fi cacy of these methods [1] . The results showed that intraoperative local anesthesia can effectively control postoperative pain, especially TAPB can better manage postoperative pain. Many aspects of this study are well done. The authors conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled study. They had 160 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis and used statistical analysis to rule out confounding factors that might in fl uence postoperative pain, such as age, gender, previous operations, body mass index and number of trocars. In addition, they openly discussed the limitations of their study. All of these are advantages of research design. We can learn from their examples. However, we believe that there are several important questions in this study that are not well addressed. The authors
关于 "局麻药应用方法在腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛控制中的效果;随机对照试验 "的评论文章
我们怀着极大的兴趣阅读了 2022 年发表在《国际外科杂志》上的文章。作者观察了局麻注射(LAI)、腹部局麻注射(IPLA)、经腹平面阻滞(TAPB)和无局麻对照组对术后疼痛的效果,并比较了这些方法的镇痛效果[1]。结果表明,术中局部麻醉能有效控制术后疼痛,尤其是 TAPB 能更好地控制术后疼痛。这项研究的许多方面都做得很好。作者进行了一项双盲随机对照研究。他们对160名因胆囊炎接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行了统计分析,排除了可能影响术后疼痛的混杂因素,如年龄、性别、既往手术、体重指数和套管数量。此外,他们还公开讨论了研究的局限性。这些都是研究设计的优点。我们可以从他们的例子中学习。不过,我们认为这项研究中有几个重要问题没有得到很好的解决。作者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信