Path to Understand Research Methods and Scientific Language

Innovations Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.54882/7420237411053
Pelekeh H. Tapang
{"title":"Path to Understand Research Methods and Scientific Language","authors":"Pelekeh H. Tapang","doi":"10.54882/7420237411053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper embarks on a classical scientific journey to explore and elucidate the intricate world of research cognition and methods. Delving into quantitative and qualitative methodologies, highlighting their features, and dispels misconceptions and erroneous assumptions surrounding them. The discourse extends to examining the pros and cons of these approaches, clarifying terminology related to case studies and population size. The work advocates for revisions in referencing styles and argues against the use of a, b, c format in in-text citations. The paper also clarifies why experimental research cannot be conducted by social sciences due to its inherently limited control power features, compared to the natural sciences. Through the navigation of this path, the ultimate goal is to demystify research methodologies and cultivate a deeper comprehension of scientific language","PeriodicalId":80004,"journal":{"name":"Innovations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54882/7420237411053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper embarks on a classical scientific journey to explore and elucidate the intricate world of research cognition and methods. Delving into quantitative and qualitative methodologies, highlighting their features, and dispels misconceptions and erroneous assumptions surrounding them. The discourse extends to examining the pros and cons of these approaches, clarifying terminology related to case studies and population size. The work advocates for revisions in referencing styles and argues against the use of a, b, c format in in-text citations. The paper also clarifies why experimental research cannot be conducted by social sciences due to its inherently limited control power features, compared to the natural sciences. Through the navigation of this path, the ultimate goal is to demystify research methodologies and cultivate a deeper comprehension of scientific language
了解研究方法和科学语言的途径
本文开启了一次经典的科学之旅,探索并阐明了错综复杂的研究认知和方法世界。本文深入探讨了定量和定性方法,强调了它们的特点,并消除了围绕它们的误解和错误假设。文章还探讨了这些方法的利弊,澄清了与案例研究和人口规模相关的术语。论文提倡修改参考文献样式,反对在文中引用时使用 a、b、c 格式。论文还阐明了为什么社会科学不能开展实验研究,因为与自然科学相比,实验研究本身的控制力有限。通过这条路径的导航,最终目标是揭开研究方法的神秘面纱,培养对科学语言的深入理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信