Diagnostic Accuracy Of Acromioaxillosuprasternal Notch Index For Prediction Of Difficult Airway Taking Cormack And Lehane Grading System As Gold Standard

Muhammad Mohsin Sajjad, Amina Tariq, Muhammad Shabbir, Sidra Yousaf
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy Of Acromioaxillosuprasternal Notch Index For Prediction Of Difficult Airway Taking Cormack And Lehane Grading System As Gold Standard","authors":"Muhammad Mohsin Sajjad, Amina Tariq, Muhammad Shabbir, Sidra Yousaf","doi":"10.37939/jrmc.v27i3.2269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: General anesthesia is still needed for several surgical interventions and requires endotracheal intubation. The difficult airway is a well-known entity, and a long list of predicting scores is present, yet a high degree of diagnostic accuracy still needs to be improved. Acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (AASI) has shown some excellent results in recent times. Objective: Its objective is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index for predicting difficult airways and to take the Cormack and Lehane grading system as the gold standard. Methodology:   In this study, adults of both genders aged 20 to 70 years undergoing any surgery under general anesthesia having ASA class I to IV were included. AASI score of equal or less than 0.49 was taken as difficult airway while on Cormack and Lehane grade; it was labeled as yes where grade III or IV was seen. Results: The total number of cases were 350 cases, out of which 218 (62.29%) were males, and 132 (37.71%) were females. The mean age was 40.20±12.86 years, and the mean BMI was 24.71±3.13 (table 17). There were 294 (84%) cases in ASA Class I and II and 56 (14%) in class III and IV. Difficult intubation on AASI was seen in 54 (15.43%) and 57 (16.29%) cases on Cormack and Lehane grading.  The diagnostic accuracy of AASI for prediction of difficult intubating a difficult was 96.29% with sensitivity of 90.74%, specificity of 97.30%, PPV of 85.96%, NPV of 98.29% with p= 0.001. This difference was also statistically significant with all the confounding variables like age, gender, ASA class, and BMI.  Conclusion: The acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index is a significant predictor for tubing a difficult airway and taking Cormack and Lehane's grading as the gold standard. This difference is considerably better regarding age, gender, BMI, and ASA class.","PeriodicalId":34174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v27i3.2269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General anesthesia is still needed for several surgical interventions and requires endotracheal intubation. The difficult airway is a well-known entity, and a long list of predicting scores is present, yet a high degree of diagnostic accuracy still needs to be improved. Acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (AASI) has shown some excellent results in recent times. Objective: Its objective is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index for predicting difficult airways and to take the Cormack and Lehane grading system as the gold standard. Methodology:   In this study, adults of both genders aged 20 to 70 years undergoing any surgery under general anesthesia having ASA class I to IV were included. AASI score of equal or less than 0.49 was taken as difficult airway while on Cormack and Lehane grade; it was labeled as yes where grade III or IV was seen. Results: The total number of cases were 350 cases, out of which 218 (62.29%) were males, and 132 (37.71%) were females. The mean age was 40.20±12.86 years, and the mean BMI was 24.71±3.13 (table 17). There were 294 (84%) cases in ASA Class I and II and 56 (14%) in class III and IV. Difficult intubation on AASI was seen in 54 (15.43%) and 57 (16.29%) cases on Cormack and Lehane grading.  The diagnostic accuracy of AASI for prediction of difficult intubating a difficult was 96.29% with sensitivity of 90.74%, specificity of 97.30%, PPV of 85.96%, NPV of 98.29% with p= 0.001. This difference was also statistically significant with all the confounding variables like age, gender, ASA class, and BMI.  Conclusion: The acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index is a significant predictor for tubing a difficult airway and taking Cormack and Lehane's grading as the gold standard. This difference is considerably better regarding age, gender, BMI, and ASA class.
以 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级系统为金标准,胸骨上切迹指数在预测困难气道方面的诊断准确性
背景: 一些外科手术仍然需要全身麻醉,并且需要气管插管。困难气道是一个众所周知的问题,目前已有一长串预测评分,但诊断准确性仍有待提高。近来,腋上胸骨切迹指数(AASI)取得了一些卓越的成果。 目标: 其目的是确定肩峰胸骨切迹指数预测困难气道的诊断准确性,并将 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级系统作为金标准。 研究方法: 研究对象包括 20 至 70 岁、在全身麻醉下接受任何手术且 ASA 分级为 I 至 IV 级的男女成人。AASI 评分等于或小于 0.49 为困难气道,而在 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级中,如果出现 III 级或 IV 级,则标记为 "是"。 结果: 病例总数为 350 例,其中男性 218 例(62.29%),女性 132 例(37.71%)。平均年龄为(40.20±12.86)岁,平均体重指数为(24.71±3.13)(表 17)。ASA I 级和 II 级病例 294 例(84%),III 级和 IV 级病例 56 例(14%)。54 例(15.43%)和 57 例(16.29%)根据 AASI 和 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级出现插管困难。 AASI 预测困难插管的诊断准确率为 96.29%,敏感性为 90.74%,特异性为 97.30%,PPV 为 85.96%,NPV 为 98.29%,P= 0.001。与年龄、性别、ASA 分级和体重指数等所有混杂变量相比,这一差异也具有统计学意义。 结论 以 Cormack 和 Lehane 的分级作为金标准,尖峰胸骨上切迹指数是预测困难气道的重要指标。这种差异在年龄、性别、体重指数和 ASA 分级方面要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信