Comparative analysis of KnockOut serum replacement and fetal bovine serum for in vitro culture of human dermal fibroblasts

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nur Ilham Risma Hidayati, Indra Kusuma, Eko Poerwanto
{"title":"Comparative analysis of KnockOut serum replacement and fetal bovine serum for in vitro culture of human dermal fibroblasts","authors":"Nur Ilham Risma Hidayati, Indra Kusuma, Eko Poerwanto","doi":"10.18051/univmed.2023.v42.283-293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDHuman dermal fibroblast (HDF) cultures can be used as a regenerative agent for wound healing. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) as a culture supplement is derived from animals, therefore not being constant in composition, causes variations in research results, thus requiring a substitute such as KnockOut serum replacement (KOSR). This study evaluated the defined KOSR as FBS substitute for HDF culture by measuring the relative expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) messenger RNA (mRNA), HDF cell proliferation, and HDF migration. METHODSHuman dermal fibroblast culture was divided into 2 intervention groups receiving KOSR 5% and KOSR 10%, respectively, and a control group receiving FBS 10%. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used for bFGF and KGF mRNA relative expression at the fifth passage (P5). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) reagent was used for the HDF cell proliferation assay at P5 and the scratch assay was used for HDF cell migration at P6. Data were analyzed using dependent t-test, One-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTSThere were no significant differences in bFGF and KGF mRNA relative expression and HDF migration velocity between the intervention and control groups (p>0.05 and p>0.05, respectively). The doubling time of the KOSR 5% group showed no significant difference (p>0.05), but KOSR 10% and FBS 10% showed significant differences between treatment days 2-6 and treatment days 6-10 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONSThe KOSR 10% was comparable to FBS 10% in supporting bFGF and KGF mRNA relative expression, HDF cell proliferation, and HDF cell migration in HDF culture.","PeriodicalId":42578,"journal":{"name":"Universa Medicina","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universa Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2023.v42.283-293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUNDHuman dermal fibroblast (HDF) cultures can be used as a regenerative agent for wound healing. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) as a culture supplement is derived from animals, therefore not being constant in composition, causes variations in research results, thus requiring a substitute such as KnockOut serum replacement (KOSR). This study evaluated the defined KOSR as FBS substitute for HDF culture by measuring the relative expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) messenger RNA (mRNA), HDF cell proliferation, and HDF migration. METHODSHuman dermal fibroblast culture was divided into 2 intervention groups receiving KOSR 5% and KOSR 10%, respectively, and a control group receiving FBS 10%. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used for bFGF and KGF mRNA relative expression at the fifth passage (P5). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) reagent was used for the HDF cell proliferation assay at P5 and the scratch assay was used for HDF cell migration at P6. Data were analyzed using dependent t-test, One-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTSThere were no significant differences in bFGF and KGF mRNA relative expression and HDF migration velocity between the intervention and control groups (p>0.05 and p>0.05, respectively). The doubling time of the KOSR 5% group showed no significant difference (p>0.05), but KOSR 10% and FBS 10% showed significant differences between treatment days 2-6 and treatment days 6-10 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONSThe KOSR 10% was comparable to FBS 10% in supporting bFGF and KGF mRNA relative expression, HDF cell proliferation, and HDF cell migration in HDF culture.
用于人真皮成纤维细胞体外培养的 KnockOut 血清替代物与胎牛血清的比较分析
背景人类真皮成纤维细胞(HDF)培养物可用作伤口愈合的再生剂。胎牛血清(FBS)作为一种培养辅料来自动物,因此其成分并不恒定,会导致研究结果的差异,因此需要一种替代品,如基因敲除血清替代物(KOSR)。本研究通过测定碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)和角质形成细胞生长因子(KGF)信使 RNA(mRNA)的相对表达量、HDF 细胞增殖和 HDF 迁移,对 KOSR 作为 FBS 替代品用于 HDF 培养进行了评估。方法将人真皮成纤维细胞分为两个干预组,分别接受 5% KOSR 和 10% KOSR,以及接受 10% FBS 的对照组。采用反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测第五周期(P5)时 bFGF 和 KGF mRNA 的相对表达。细胞计数试剂盒-8(CCK-8)试剂用于 P5 期的 HDF 细胞增殖试验,划痕试验用于 P6 期的 HDF 细胞迁移试验。数据分析采用依赖性 t 检验、单因素方差分析或 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。结果干预组和对照组的 bFGF 和 KGF mRNA 相对表达量和 HDF 迁移速度无显著差异(分别为 p>0.05 和 p>0.05)。KOSR 5% 组的倍增时间无显著差异(p>0.05),但 KOSR 10% 和 FBS 10% 组的倍增时间在治疗第 2-6 天和第 6-10 天之间有显著差异(p<0.05)。结论KOSR 10%在支持 HDF 培养中 bFGF 和 KGF mRNA 的相对表达、HDF 细胞增殖和 HDF 细胞迁移方面与 FBS 10%相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Universa Medicina
Universa Medicina MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信