Tensile Characteristics of Rubber Material of Firefighting Supplies According to Test Piece Shape

Jong-Sang Kim, Yong-Taek Han
{"title":"Tensile Characteristics of Rubber Material of Firefighting Supplies According to Test Piece Shape","authors":"Jong-Sang Kim, Yong-Taek Han","doi":"10.7731/kifse.05f2a959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, rubber materials are widely utilized in firefighting supplies. They are utilized as rubber packing, such as air respirators, rubber bands, such as pipe windows, and rubber packing, such as fire extinguishers. EPDM initially utilized the rubber packing material, but because of aging and curing, it is difficult to maintain air tightness in the cracked gap; therefore, it has been replaced with NBR and utilized until now. In addition, among the material's physical properties, tensile properties are required, and the form usually adopted as a tensile test specimen is generally an aging form. However, rubber utilized in firefighting supplies employs rubber packing or rubber ring products. Currently, tensile tests are conducted by manufacturing a sample as a dumbbell from a separately manufactured sample without conducting a tensile test with a rubber ring-type specimen. Furthermore, questions often arise about the tensile properties of rubber rings. Therefore, this study tested the tensile properties with a ring-shaped specimen. In KS M ISO 37, it is generally known that an annular-type test piece is desirable for tensile strength measurement. An annular-type test piece has a lower value than an annular-type test piece, and an annular test piece with an elongation rate is almost the same value as an annular-type test piece. Therefore, the test was conducted to find the difference between the test piece as a dumbbell and the actual ring-shaped specimen. As a result of the tensile test, the tensile strength was found to be lower in the range of 11.8-15.5% in the ring-shaped test piece than in the age-shaped test piece, and the elongation rate was lower in the range of 4.1-40.1% than in the age-shaped test piece. This is thought to be because the stress of the stretched high-ring-shaped specimen is not equal to the cross-sectional area of the specimen. However, the tensile property value of the rubber material was satisfied with both types of test pieces with the reference value required for approval.","PeriodicalId":225639,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fire Science and Engineering","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fire Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.05f2a959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, rubber materials are widely utilized in firefighting supplies. They are utilized as rubber packing, such as air respirators, rubber bands, such as pipe windows, and rubber packing, such as fire extinguishers. EPDM initially utilized the rubber packing material, but because of aging and curing, it is difficult to maintain air tightness in the cracked gap; therefore, it has been replaced with NBR and utilized until now. In addition, among the material's physical properties, tensile properties are required, and the form usually adopted as a tensile test specimen is generally an aging form. However, rubber utilized in firefighting supplies employs rubber packing or rubber ring products. Currently, tensile tests are conducted by manufacturing a sample as a dumbbell from a separately manufactured sample without conducting a tensile test with a rubber ring-type specimen. Furthermore, questions often arise about the tensile properties of rubber rings. Therefore, this study tested the tensile properties with a ring-shaped specimen. In KS M ISO 37, it is generally known that an annular-type test piece is desirable for tensile strength measurement. An annular-type test piece has a lower value than an annular-type test piece, and an annular test piece with an elongation rate is almost the same value as an annular-type test piece. Therefore, the test was conducted to find the difference between the test piece as a dumbbell and the actual ring-shaped specimen. As a result of the tensile test, the tensile strength was found to be lower in the range of 11.8-15.5% in the ring-shaped test piece than in the age-shaped test piece, and the elongation rate was lower in the range of 4.1-40.1% than in the age-shaped test piece. This is thought to be because the stress of the stretched high-ring-shaped specimen is not equal to the cross-sectional area of the specimen. However, the tensile property value of the rubber material was satisfied with both types of test pieces with the reference value required for approval.
根据试件形状确定消防用品橡胶材料的拉伸特性
目前,橡胶材料被广泛应用于消防用品中。它们被用作空气呼吸器等橡胶填料、管道窗等橡胶带和灭火器等橡胶填料。三元乙丙橡胶(EPDM)最初用作橡胶盘根材料,但由于老化和固化,很难保持裂缝间隙的气密性,因此被丁腈橡胶(NBR)取代,并一直沿用至今。此外,在材料的物理性能中,拉伸性能是必需的,而通常采用的拉伸试样形式一般是老化形式。然而,消防用品中使用的橡胶是橡胶盘根或橡胶圈产品。目前,拉伸试验是通过将单独制造的样品制成哑铃状来进行的,而没有使用橡胶圈型试样进行拉伸试验。此外,橡胶圈的拉伸性能也经常出现问题。因此,本研究测试了环形试样的拉伸性能。在 KS M ISO 37 中,众所周知,拉伸强度测量最好使用环形试样。环形试样的数值比环形试样低,而环形试样的伸长率与环形试样的数值几乎相同。因此,试验的目的是找出哑铃状试件与实际环形试件之间的差异。拉伸试验结果表明,环形试件的拉伸强度在 11.8-15.5% 的范围内低于年龄形试件,伸长率在 4.1-40.1% 的范围内低于年龄形试件。这可能是因为拉伸的高环形试样的应力不等于试样的横截面积。不过,两种类型试件的橡胶材料拉伸性能值都符合审批所需的参考值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信