Comparative Study of Numerical Simulation and Experiment on Temperature Distribution and Central Vent Flow Velocity in Ceiling-vented Compartment Fire

M. Park, Yun Young Kim, Chi Young Lee
{"title":"Comparative Study of Numerical Simulation and Experiment on Temperature Distribution and Central Vent Flow Velocity in Ceiling-vented Compartment Fire","authors":"M. Park, Yun Young Kim, Chi Young Lee","doi":"10.7731/kifse.9a45db07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we conducted numerical simulations to analyze fire phenomena in a compartment with a ceiling vent and compared these numerical simulation results with previous experimental data. Based on the previous experimental conditions, under the heat release rate of 1.5 kW, the vent areas of 1% and 10% of the floor area and the fire sources both at the center and side of the floor were tested. Overall trends of temperature distribution and central vent flow velocity in the present numerical simulations were consistent with those in the previous experiments. The temperature within the compartment was observed to be higher when the vent area was smaller. For compartment with a smaller vent area, the temperature distribution showed minor variations with the fire source location. However, with a larger vent area, temperatures were notably higher when the fire source was at the side than at the center. The present numerical simulations slightly overestimated the temperatures from the previous experimental results, resulting in a bias factor of 1.07 and a model's relative standard deviation of 0.07 for temperature. Regarding the flow velocity at the center of ceiling vent, the fluctuations over time were more pronounced when the fire source was centrally located. When the fire source was at the center, the average central vent outflow velocity was higher for compartment with a larger vent area. When the fire source was positioned to the side, the vent area appeared to have minimal impact on the average central vent outflow velocity. It was also observed that the average central vent outflow velocity was higher when the fire source was centrally placed when compared to a side location. The present numerical simulations underestimated the previous experimental results for the average central vent outflow velocity, and the bias factor and the model’s relative standard deviation for the average central vent outflow velocity were 0.63 and 0.39, respectively.","PeriodicalId":225639,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fire Science and Engineering","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fire Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.9a45db07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we conducted numerical simulations to analyze fire phenomena in a compartment with a ceiling vent and compared these numerical simulation results with previous experimental data. Based on the previous experimental conditions, under the heat release rate of 1.5 kW, the vent areas of 1% and 10% of the floor area and the fire sources both at the center and side of the floor were tested. Overall trends of temperature distribution and central vent flow velocity in the present numerical simulations were consistent with those in the previous experiments. The temperature within the compartment was observed to be higher when the vent area was smaller. For compartment with a smaller vent area, the temperature distribution showed minor variations with the fire source location. However, with a larger vent area, temperatures were notably higher when the fire source was at the side than at the center. The present numerical simulations slightly overestimated the temperatures from the previous experimental results, resulting in a bias factor of 1.07 and a model's relative standard deviation of 0.07 for temperature. Regarding the flow velocity at the center of ceiling vent, the fluctuations over time were more pronounced when the fire source was centrally located. When the fire source was at the center, the average central vent outflow velocity was higher for compartment with a larger vent area. When the fire source was positioned to the side, the vent area appeared to have minimal impact on the average central vent outflow velocity. It was also observed that the average central vent outflow velocity was higher when the fire source was centrally placed when compared to a side location. The present numerical simulations underestimated the previous experimental results for the average central vent outflow velocity, and the bias factor and the model’s relative standard deviation for the average central vent outflow velocity were 0.63 and 0.39, respectively.
顶棚通风隔间火灾中温度分布和中央通风口流速的数值模拟与实验对比研究
在本研究中,我们对带有天花板通风口的隔间内的火灾现象进行了数值模拟分析,并将这些数值模拟结果与之前的实验数据进行了比较。根据以往的实验条件,在热释放率为 1.5 kW 的条件下,分别测试了占地板面积 1%和 10%的通风口面积以及地板中央和侧面的火源。本次数值模拟的温度分布和中央通风口流速的总体趋势与之前的实验结果一致。据观察,当通风口面积较小时,隔间内的温度较高。对于通风口面积较小的隔间,温度分布随火源位置的变化较小。然而,当通风口面积较大时,火源位于侧面时的温度明显高于位于中央时的温度。本次数值模拟略微高估了之前实验结果的温度,导致偏差系数为 1.07,模型温度的相对标准偏差为 0.07。关于天花板通风口中心的流速,当火源位于中心位置时,随时间的波动更为明显。当火源位于中央时,通风口面积较大的隔间的中央通风口平均流出速度较高。当火源位于侧面时,通风口面积对平均中央通风口流出速度的影响似乎很小。另外还观察到,与侧面位置相比,火源位于中央位置时,中央通风口的平均流出速度更高。本次数值模拟低估了之前实验结果中的平均中心喷口流出速度,平均中心喷口流出速度的偏差系数和模型的相对标准偏差分别为 0.63 和 0.39。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信