Comparing the effects of vitamin A ointment and liposic gel on corneal abrasion prevention during general anesthesia in nonocular surgeries: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nazanin Amini, K. Rezaei, A. Moslemi, Mehdi Harorani, H. Modir
{"title":"Comparing the effects of vitamin A ointment and liposic gel on corneal abrasion prevention during general anesthesia in nonocular surgeries: a double-blind randomized clinical trial","authors":"Nazanin Amini, K. Rezaei, A. Moslemi, Mehdi Harorani, H. Modir","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_47_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare the effects of vitamin A ointment and Liposic gel on perioperative corneal abrasion (CA) prevention during nonocular surgeries. A double-blind randomized clinical trial. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial 50 eligible candidates for nonocular surgeries were purposively selected from XXX teaching hospital, XXX. One patient eye was randomly allocated to the vitamin A group and the other eye to the Liposic gel group. Immediately after anesthesia induction and blinking reflex suppression, eye care was provided using vitamin A ointment in the vitamin A group and Liposic gel in the Liposic gel group. CA was assessed using the fluorescein eye stain test at the end of general anesthesia, at the end of postoperative recovery, and 24 h after surgery. Eye problems were also assessed 24 h after surgery using an eye problems questionnaire. The SPSS software (v. 23.0) was employed for data analysis through the Wilcoxon’s, paired-sample t, and Friedman’s tests as well as the repeated measures analysis of variance. The prevalence of CA in the vitamin A and the Liposic gel groups was 32 and 50% at the end of general anesthesia (P=0.039), 32 and 52% at the end of postoperative recovery (P = 0.018), and 0 and 0% 24 h after surgery (P = 1.00), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences respecting postoperative eye problems (P > 0.05). Vitamin A ointment is more effective than Liposic gel in significantly preventing CA among patients undergoing non-ocular surgeries under general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_47_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of vitamin A ointment and Liposic gel on perioperative corneal abrasion (CA) prevention during nonocular surgeries. A double-blind randomized clinical trial. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial 50 eligible candidates for nonocular surgeries were purposively selected from XXX teaching hospital, XXX. One patient eye was randomly allocated to the vitamin A group and the other eye to the Liposic gel group. Immediately after anesthesia induction and blinking reflex suppression, eye care was provided using vitamin A ointment in the vitamin A group and Liposic gel in the Liposic gel group. CA was assessed using the fluorescein eye stain test at the end of general anesthesia, at the end of postoperative recovery, and 24 h after surgery. Eye problems were also assessed 24 h after surgery using an eye problems questionnaire. The SPSS software (v. 23.0) was employed for data analysis through the Wilcoxon’s, paired-sample t, and Friedman’s tests as well as the repeated measures analysis of variance. The prevalence of CA in the vitamin A and the Liposic gel groups was 32 and 50% at the end of general anesthesia (P=0.039), 32 and 52% at the end of postoperative recovery (P = 0.018), and 0 and 0% 24 h after surgery (P = 1.00), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences respecting postoperative eye problems (P > 0.05). Vitamin A ointment is more effective than Liposic gel in significantly preventing CA among patients undergoing non-ocular surgeries under general anesthesia.
比较维生素 A 软膏和脂溶性凝胶在非眼科手术全身麻醉期间预防角膜擦伤的效果:双盲随机临床试验
本研究旨在比较维生素 A 软膏和 Liposic 凝胶在非眼科手术围手术期预防角膜擦伤(CA)的效果。 双盲随机临床试验。 在这项双盲随机临床试验中,特意从 XXX 教学医院挑选了 50 名符合条件的非眼科手术候选者。患者的一只眼睛被随机分配到维生素 A 组,另一只眼睛被随机分配到脂溶性凝胶组。在麻醉诱导和眨眼反射抑制后,维生素 A 组立即使用维生素 A 软膏,脂溶性凝胶组立即使用脂溶性凝胶进行眼部护理。在全身麻醉结束时、术后恢复结束时和术后 24 小时内,使用荧光素眼部染色试验对 CA 进行评估。术后 24 小时后,还使用眼部问题问卷对眼部问题进行了评估。数据分析采用 SPSS 软件(23.0 版),通过 Wilcoxon 检验、配对样本 t 检验、Friedman 检验和重复测量方差分析进行。 维生素 A 组和脂溶性凝胶组在全身麻醉结束时的 CA 患病率分别为 32% 和 50%(P=0.039),术后恢复结束时分别为 32% 和 52%(P=0.018),术后 24 小时分别为 0% 和 0%(P=1.00)。在术后眼部问题方面,组间差异不明显(P > 0.05)。 在全身麻醉下接受非眼科手术的患者中,维生素 A 软膏在显著预防 CA 方面比 Liposic 凝胶更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信