Insufficient mandibular Alveolar ridge expansion for Dental Implant Placement: Ossiodensification vs. Ridge Splitting techniques

Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.21608/aadj.2023.326291

Omar Elfarouk Sadek Ahmed, Ashraf Mahmoud, Hossam El-Dein Ali, M. El-Ashmawy, Abdelaziz Abdullah, Aly Tawfik Abdo, Mohamed Abdelfattah

{"title":"Insufficient mandibular Alveolar ridge expansion for Dental Implant Placement: Ossiodensification vs. Ridge Splitting techniques","authors":"Omar Elfarouk Sadek Ahmed, Ashraf Mahmoud, Hossam El-Dein Ali, M. El-Ashmawy, Abdelaziz Abdullah, Aly Tawfik Abdo, Mohamed Abdelfattah","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2023.326291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim : To assess Narrow Alveolar Ridge Expansion by Ossiodensification vs. Ridge Splitting Techniques for Dental Implant Placement. Subjects and methods : Twenty patients were included in our study with narrow ridge width of 3-6 mm at crestal bone level. They were divided into two groups: Group I Osseodensification technique, Group II Ridge splitting technique with bone expanders and sticky bone augmentation with immediate implant placement in both groups. With assessment of implant stability (ISQ) , and bone density in CBCT. Results Group I had showed statistically significant increase in mean bone density postoperative, after 3, 6 and 9 months (p<0.001*). Group II had showed statistically significant increase in mean bone density postoperative, after 3, 6 and 9 months (p<0.001). Group II was 72.70 ± 4.55 that showed statistically significant increase in mean ISQ reading after 6 and 9 months (p<0.001). Conclusion : Osseodensification was demonstrated higher implant primary stability and bone density around dental implants without bone sacrificially.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2023.326291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim : To assess Narrow Alveolar Ridge Expansion by Ossiodensification vs. Ridge Splitting Techniques for Dental Implant Placement. Subjects and methods : Twenty patients were included in our study with narrow ridge width of 3-6 mm at crestal bone level. They were divided into two groups: Group I Osseodensification technique, Group II Ridge splitting technique with bone expanders and sticky bone augmentation with immediate implant placement in both groups. With assessment of implant stability (ISQ) , and bone density in CBCT. Results Group I had showed statistically significant increase in mean bone density postoperative, after 3, 6 and 9 months (p<0.001*). Group II had showed statistically significant increase in mean bone density postoperative, after 3, 6 and 9 months (p<0.001). Group II was 72.70 ± 4.55 that showed statistically significant increase in mean ISQ reading after 6 and 9 months (p<0.001). Conclusion : Osseodensification was demonstrated higher implant primary stability and bone density around dental implants without bone sacrificially.

查看原文本刊更多论文

下颌牙槽嵴扩展不足，无法植入种植牙：骨质增生与牙脊分割技术

目的：评估骨碘化法与牙槽嵴裂法在牙种植体植入中的窄牙槽嵴扩张效果。研究对象和方法：研究对象包括 20 名牙槽骨嵴水平窄嵴宽度为 3-6 毫米的患者。他们被分为两组：第一组：骨增量技术；第二组：使用骨扩张器的牙脊裂开技术和粘骨增量技术，两组均立即植入种植体。通过 CBCT 评估种植体稳定性（ISQ）和骨密度。结果第一组的平均骨密度在术后 3、6 和 9 个月后均有明显增加（P<0.001*）。第二组术后 3 个月、6 个月和 9 个月的平均骨密度均有明显增加（P<0.001）。第二组的平均 ISQ 值为 72.70 ± 4.55，6 个月和 9 个月后的平均 ISQ 值有明显增加（P<0.001）。结论：在不牺牲骨质的情况下，骨质增生可提高种植体的初期稳定性和种植体周围的骨密度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量