Evaluation of the Therapy Protocols and Vaccines Applied in the COVID-19 Pandemic

G. Ozbey, A. Hanafiah, A. Sukri, František Zigo, J. Arvaiová
{"title":"Evaluation of the Therapy Protocols and Vaccines Applied in the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"G. Ozbey, A. Hanafiah, A. Sukri, František Zigo, J. Arvaiová","doi":"10.28991/esj-2023-07-05-022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a plethora of research on vaccine developments and the adverse effects of the vaccineworldwide, there are several research studies on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or rejection. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine on treatment and the factors that contributed to the vaccine concerns. Methods: After one month of being approved by the ethics committee, a descriptive cross-sectional research was conducted using online resources. Samples were randomly selected from the study population. The current study included adults (>18 years old) who were randomly selected from different provinces of Turkey. Results: Most participants were young adults 18–23 years old (47.9%), female (64.8%), married (36.1%), with university education (70.4%), and without medical illness (60.9%) (mean age = 28 years old). Both vaccination doses were given to 53% of the individuals. The most frequent symptom was discomfort at the injection site (0.14%), followed by asthenia muscle pain (0.01%) and edema (24.5%) at the injection site. More symptoms were reported by women than by men. Social media accounts and websites of professional organizations, namely the Dental Association, the Ministry of Health, and the World Health Organization (WHO), were the main sources of COVID-19 information. Hesitancy was induced by concerns about side effects (67.7%), safety (69.7%), lack of information (43.1%), inadequate data on the vaccine clinical trials (55.9%), lack of information on how long protective and effectiveness of vaccines (69.4%), lack of information on how effectiveness against variants (74.8%), think COVID-19 is not dangerous (69.7%), not effectiveness (22.6%) of the vaccine, not safe (32.6%), change my genetic make-up and cause it reproductive sterilite (20.2%), high number of deaths due to COVID-19 (60.8%), the presence of dangerous materials such as aluminum, mercury and others in the content of vaccines, concerns about the country producing the vaccine (38.2%), being afraid of the injection (22%), being against vaccination in general (11%), negative news in the press and social media (38.6%), being risky for only people over 60 (15.9%), having a strong immune system (38.4%), religious (4.7%) and cultural factors (7.4%), believing in natural and traditional medicine (25.4%), and being influenced by friends or family members (19.6%). Hesitancy to accept the COVID-19 vaccine was observed in subjects with hypercholosterolemia and diabetes mellitus. In conclusion, Vaccine hesitancy was primarily related to safety apprehensions. Educational and demographic traits were associated with vaccine admissibility. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-05-022 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":502658,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Science Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2023-07-05-022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a plethora of research on vaccine developments and the adverse effects of the vaccineworldwide, there are several research studies on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or rejection. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine on treatment and the factors that contributed to the vaccine concerns. Methods: After one month of being approved by the ethics committee, a descriptive cross-sectional research was conducted using online resources. Samples were randomly selected from the study population. The current study included adults (>18 years old) who were randomly selected from different provinces of Turkey. Results: Most participants were young adults 18–23 years old (47.9%), female (64.8%), married (36.1%), with university education (70.4%), and without medical illness (60.9%) (mean age = 28 years old). Both vaccination doses were given to 53% of the individuals. The most frequent symptom was discomfort at the injection site (0.14%), followed by asthenia muscle pain (0.01%) and edema (24.5%) at the injection site. More symptoms were reported by women than by men. Social media accounts and websites of professional organizations, namely the Dental Association, the Ministry of Health, and the World Health Organization (WHO), were the main sources of COVID-19 information. Hesitancy was induced by concerns about side effects (67.7%), safety (69.7%), lack of information (43.1%), inadequate data on the vaccine clinical trials (55.9%), lack of information on how long protective and effectiveness of vaccines (69.4%), lack of information on how effectiveness against variants (74.8%), think COVID-19 is not dangerous (69.7%), not effectiveness (22.6%) of the vaccine, not safe (32.6%), change my genetic make-up and cause it reproductive sterilite (20.2%), high number of deaths due to COVID-19 (60.8%), the presence of dangerous materials such as aluminum, mercury and others in the content of vaccines, concerns about the country producing the vaccine (38.2%), being afraid of the injection (22%), being against vaccination in general (11%), negative news in the press and social media (38.6%), being risky for only people over 60 (15.9%), having a strong immune system (38.4%), religious (4.7%) and cultural factors (7.4%), believing in natural and traditional medicine (25.4%), and being influenced by friends or family members (19.6%). Hesitancy to accept the COVID-19 vaccine was observed in subjects with hypercholosterolemia and diabetes mellitus. In conclusion, Vaccine hesitancy was primarily related to safety apprehensions. Educational and demographic traits were associated with vaccine admissibility. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-05-022 Full Text: PDF
评估在 COVID-19 大流行中应用的治疗方案和疫苗
尽管世界范围内对疫苗发展和疫苗不良反应的研究层出不穷,但仍有几项关于 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决或排斥反应的研究。本研究的目的是调查 COVID-19 疫苗对治疗的影响以及导致疫苗担忧的因素。研究方法在获得伦理委员会批准一个月后,利用在线资源开展了一项描述性横断面研究。样本从研究人群中随机抽取。本次研究包括从土耳其不同省份随机抽取的成年人(大于 18 岁)。研究结果大多数参与者为 18-23 岁的年轻人(47.9%),女性(64.8%),已婚(36.1%),受过大学教育(70.4%),无疾病(60.9%)(平均年龄 = 28 岁)。53%的人接种了两剂疫苗。最常见的症状是注射部位不适(0.14%),其次是肌肉酸痛(0.01%)和注射部位水肿(24.5%)。女性报告的症状多于男性。社交媒体账户和专业组织网站,即牙科协会、卫生部和世界卫生组织(WHO),是 COVID-19 的主要信息来源。犹豫不决的原因包括:担心副作用(67.7%)、安全性(69.7%)、缺乏信息(43.1%)、疫苗临床试验数据不足(55.9%)、缺乏关于疫苗保护期和有效性的信息(69.4%)、缺乏关于如何有效预防变种的信息(74.8%)、认为 COVID-19 不危险(69.7%)、疫苗不有效(22.6%)、不安全(32.6%)、改变我的基因组成并导致其生殖不育(20.2%)、COVID-19 导致的死亡人数较多(60.8%)、疫苗成分中含有铝、汞等危险物质(38.2%)、对疫苗生产国的担忧(38.2%)、害怕注射(22%)、普遍反对接种疫苗(11%)、媒体和社交媒体上的负面新闻(38.6%)、只对 60 岁以上的人有风险(15.9%)、免疫系统强(38.4%)、宗教(4.7%)和文化因素(7.4%)、相信自然和传统医学(25.4%)以及受朋友或家人的影响(19.6%)。患有高胆固醇血症和糖尿病的受试者对 COVID-19 疫苗持犹豫态度。总之,疫苗接种犹豫主要与安全性担忧有关。教育和人口统计学特征与疫苗可接受性有关。Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-05-022 全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信