Atlas fractures with and without simultaneous dens fractures differ with respect to clinical, demographic, and management characteristics

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
M. Cloney, P. Texakalidis, Anastasios G Roumeliotis, N. Tecle, N. Dahdaleh
{"title":"Atlas fractures with and without simultaneous dens fractures differ with respect to clinical, demographic, and management characteristics","authors":"M. Cloney, P. Texakalidis, Anastasios G Roumeliotis, N. Tecle, N. Dahdaleh","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_126_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with simultaneous fractures of the atlas and dens have traditionally been managed according to the dens fracture's morphology, but data supporting this practice are limited. Methods: We retrospectively examined all patients with traumatic atlas fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2016. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching to compare the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated atlas fractures to patients with simultaneous atlas-dens fractures. Results: Ninety-nine patients were identified. Patients with isolated atlas fractures were younger (61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14, P = 0.0003), had lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 5, P = 0.0005), had better presenting Nurick myelopathy scores (0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001), and had different mechanisms of injury (P = 0.0011). Multivariable regression showed that having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07], P = 0.001), worse presenting myelopathy (OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16], P < 0.001), and selection for surgery (OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97], P = 0.037). Propensity score matching yielded balanced populations (Rubin's B = 23.3, Rubin's R = 1.96) and showed that the risk of atlas fracture nonunion was no different among isolated atlas fractures compared to simultaneous atlas-dens fractures (P = 0.304). Age was the only variable independently associated with atlas fracture nonunion (OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00], P = 0.020), having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was not significant (P = 0.2829). Conclusions: Among patients with atlas fractures, simultaneous fractures of the dens occur in older patients and confer an increased risk of myelopathy and requiring surgical stabilization. Controlling for confounders, the risk of atlas fracture nonunion is equivalent for isolated atlas fractures versus simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_126_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with simultaneous fractures of the atlas and dens have traditionally been managed according to the dens fracture's morphology, but data supporting this practice are limited. Methods: We retrospectively examined all patients with traumatic atlas fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2016. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching to compare the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated atlas fractures to patients with simultaneous atlas-dens fractures. Results: Ninety-nine patients were identified. Patients with isolated atlas fractures were younger (61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14, P = 0.0003), had lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 5, P = 0.0005), had better presenting Nurick myelopathy scores (0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001), and had different mechanisms of injury (P = 0.0011). Multivariable regression showed that having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07], P = 0.001), worse presenting myelopathy (OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16], P < 0.001), and selection for surgery (OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97], P = 0.037). Propensity score matching yielded balanced populations (Rubin's B = 23.3, Rubin's R = 1.96) and showed that the risk of atlas fracture nonunion was no different among isolated atlas fractures compared to simultaneous atlas-dens fractures (P = 0.304). Age was the only variable independently associated with atlas fracture nonunion (OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00], P = 0.020), having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was not significant (P = 0.2829). Conclusions: Among patients with atlas fractures, simultaneous fractures of the dens occur in older patients and confer an increased risk of myelopathy and requiring surgical stabilization. Controlling for confounders, the risk of atlas fracture nonunion is equivalent for isolated atlas fractures versus simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.
寰椎骨折同时伴有和不伴有韧带骨折的临床、人口和管理特征不同
背景:寰椎和椎弓根同时骨折的患者传统上根据椎弓根骨折的形态进行处理,但支持这种做法的数据有限。研究方法我们回顾性研究了本院 2008 年至 2016 年间所有外伤性寰椎骨折患者。我们采用多变量回归和倾向得分匹配法,比较了孤立性寰椎骨折患者与寰椎-椎弓根同时骨折患者的表现、管理和预后。研究结果共鉴定出 99 例患者。孤立性寰椎骨折患者更年轻(61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14,P = 0.0003),Charlson合并症指数中位数更低(3 vs. 5,P = 0.0005),Nurick脊髓病评分更高(0 vs. 3,P < 0.0001),损伤机制也不同(P = 0.0011)。多变量回归显示,寰椎-椎弓根同时骨折与年龄较大(几率比 [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07],P = 0.001)、脊髓病表现较差(OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16],P < 0.001)和选择手术(OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97],P = 0.037)独立相关。倾向评分匹配得出了平衡的人群(Rubin's B = 23.3,Rubin's R = 1.96),并显示孤立的寰椎骨折与同时发生的寰椎-椎弓根骨折相比,发生寰椎骨折不愈合的风险没有差异(P = 0.304)。年龄是唯一一个与寰椎骨折不愈合独立相关的变量(OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00],P = 0.020),寰椎-椎弓根同时骨折不显著(P = 0.2829)。结论在寰椎骨折患者中,同时发生椎弓根骨折的患者年龄较大,发生脊髓病变和需要手术稳定的风险较高。控制混杂因素后,孤立寰椎骨折与寰椎与椎间盘同时骨折发生寰椎骨折不愈合的风险相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信