The Bayesian Approach is Intuitive Conditionally to Prior Exposition to These Examples

IF 1.3
Philippe Pétrin-Pomerleau, Coralie Vincent, Paola Michelle Garcia Mairena, Ece Yilmaz, Annie Théberge Charbonneau, Tracy Husereau, Ghislaine Niyonkuru, Grace Jacob
{"title":"The Bayesian Approach is Intuitive Conditionally to Prior Exposition to These Examples","authors":"Philippe Pétrin-Pomerleau, Coralie Vincent, Paola Michelle Garcia Mairena, Ece Yilmaz, Annie Théberge Charbonneau, Tracy Husereau, Ghislaine Niyonkuru, Grace Jacob","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.19.3.p244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a range of statistical approaches available to researchers. Nevertheless, in the probabilistic context, the frequentist approach is dominant, from the scientific literature to the teaching of statistical methods in higher education institutions. However, research questions are diverse, and other probabilistic statistical approaches may be advantageous in specific contexts. The methods used by researchers are derived mainly from their training. Unfortunately, alternative approaches, such as the Bayesian approach, are rarely taught, which may, in part, be due to the complexity of teaching them. This article aims to address this problem by presenting a series of fictitious examples illustrating the concepts behind Bayesian reasoning. It is intended as a tool for novice researchers looking to gain a basic understanding of the Bayesian approach. The prior, likelihood and posterior concepts will be illustrated by scenarios that learners can identify with. It is expected that novice researchers who have internalized the concepts of the Bayesian method, partly through these intuitive examples, would be more inclined to learn about this alternative statistical approach and consider using it in their research field. This could, in turn, help diversify the statistical methods used throughout the scientific literature.","PeriodicalId":93055,"journal":{"name":"The quantitative methods for psychology","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quantitative methods for psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.19.3.p244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a range of statistical approaches available to researchers. Nevertheless, in the probabilistic context, the frequentist approach is dominant, from the scientific literature to the teaching of statistical methods in higher education institutions. However, research questions are diverse, and other probabilistic statistical approaches may be advantageous in specific contexts. The methods used by researchers are derived mainly from their training. Unfortunately, alternative approaches, such as the Bayesian approach, are rarely taught, which may, in part, be due to the complexity of teaching them. This article aims to address this problem by presenting a series of fictitious examples illustrating the concepts behind Bayesian reasoning. It is intended as a tool for novice researchers looking to gain a basic understanding of the Bayesian approach. The prior, likelihood and posterior concepts will be illustrated by scenarios that learners can identify with. It is expected that novice researchers who have internalized the concepts of the Bayesian method, partly through these intuitive examples, would be more inclined to learn about this alternative statistical approach and consider using it in their research field. This could, in turn, help diversify the statistical methods used throughout the scientific literature.
贝叶斯方法的直观性取决于对这些例子的预先阐述
研究人员可以使用多种统计方法。不过,从科学文献到高等教育机构的统计方法教学,在概率论方面,频数主义方法都占主导地位。不过,研究问题多种多样,其他概率统计方法在特定情况下可能更有优势。研究人员使用的方法主要来自于他们所接受的培训。遗憾的是,贝叶斯方法等替代方法很少被教授,部分原因可能是教学的复杂性。本文旨在解决这一问题,通过一系列虚构的例子来说明贝叶斯推理背后的概念。本文旨在为希望对贝叶斯方法有基本了解的新手研究人员提供一个工具。先验、可能性和后验概念将通过学习者能够认同的情景加以说明。通过这些直观的例子,新手研究人员在部分程度上理解了贝叶斯方法的概念后,预计会更愿意了解这种替代统计方法,并考虑在自己的研究领域使用这种方法。这反过来又有助于使科学文献中使用的统计方法多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信