Comparison of facade noise reduction measurement methods: Field results

Randy Waldeck
{"title":"Comparison of facade noise reduction measurement methods: Field results","authors":"Randy Waldeck","doi":"10.1121/10.0022885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many projects require acoustical measurements of facade noise reduction be conducted to verify that Building Code, “green” rating systems (e.g., LEED), or other project interior noise criteria are met. In addition, federally funded airport sound insulation programs in the United States require facade noise reduction measurements be conducted to verify the eligibility of residences receiving sound insulation treatments. Currently, there exists a variety of standards to measure facade noise reduction (e.g., ASTM E966, ISO 16283-3, SAE ARP 6973). These standards employ various measurement methods: artificial exterior noise source, calibrated exterior noise source, line source, etc. In addition, these standards provide guidance on the location of exterior microphones (flush versus near facade) and correction factors to be applied to the data. Recently, a field comparison of three measurement methods was made at multiple residences: artificial exterior noise source, artificial interior noise source, and flush versus near microphone position. This is follow-on research from the National Academies of Science Airport Cooperative Research Project 02-51 and its purpose is to determine whether valid facade noise reduction measurements can be made with the loudspeaker located at the interior of the residence. A comparison of results across the measurement methods will be presented.","PeriodicalId":256727,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0022885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many projects require acoustical measurements of facade noise reduction be conducted to verify that Building Code, “green” rating systems (e.g., LEED), or other project interior noise criteria are met. In addition, federally funded airport sound insulation programs in the United States require facade noise reduction measurements be conducted to verify the eligibility of residences receiving sound insulation treatments. Currently, there exists a variety of standards to measure facade noise reduction (e.g., ASTM E966, ISO 16283-3, SAE ARP 6973). These standards employ various measurement methods: artificial exterior noise source, calibrated exterior noise source, line source, etc. In addition, these standards provide guidance on the location of exterior microphones (flush versus near facade) and correction factors to be applied to the data. Recently, a field comparison of three measurement methods was made at multiple residences: artificial exterior noise source, artificial interior noise source, and flush versus near microphone position. This is follow-on research from the National Academies of Science Airport Cooperative Research Project 02-51 and its purpose is to determine whether valid facade noise reduction measurements can be made with the loudspeaker located at the interior of the residence. A comparison of results across the measurement methods will be presented.
外墙降噪测量方法的比较:实地结果
许多项目要求对外墙降噪进行声学测量,以验证是否符合《建筑规范》、"绿色 "评级系统(如 LEED)或其他项目内部噪声标准。此外,美国联邦政府资助的机场隔音计划要求进行外墙降噪测量,以验证接受隔音处理的住宅是否合格。目前,有多种测量外墙降噪的标准(如 ASTM E966、ISO 16283-3、SAE ARP 6973)。这些标准采用了各种测量方法:人工外部噪声源、校准外部噪声源、线声源等。此外,这些标准还为室外传声器的位置(齐平或靠近外墙)以及应用于数据的校正因子提供了指导。最近,在多个住宅对三种测量方法进行了实地比较:人工室外噪声源、人工室内噪声源、平齐与靠近传声器位置。这是美国国家科学院机场合作研究项目 02-51 的后续研究,其目的是确定在扬声器位于住宅内部的情况下,能否进行有效的外墙降噪测量。将对各种测量方法的结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信